Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2005
Rheumatology 2006 45(5):577-583; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kei215
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative hand therapy treatments in rheumatoid arthritisa randomized controlled trial
1 School of Health and Rehabilitation, Keele University, 2 Rheumatology Department, Mid-Staffordshire General Hospitals NHS Trust, 3 School of Computing and Mathematics and 4 Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, UK.
Correspondence to: A. V. O'Brien, School of Health and Rehabilitation, MacKay Building, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK. E-mail: a.v.o'brien{at}shar.keele.ac.uk
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of three different physiotherapeutic approaches in the management of the rheumatoid hand.
Methods. In a randomized controlled trial, participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recruited from a rheumatology department in Mid-Staffordshire, UK (February 1999 to January 2001) were randomized to three groups. All received joint protection (JP) information delivered by a therapist at baseline. Group 1 participants received a set of additional hand-strengthening and mobilizing home exercises, group 2 a different set of additional hand-stretching exercises and group 3 the JP information alone. The primary outcome was the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales II (AIMS II) (upper limb; hand and finger function subscales). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Results. Sixty-seven participants (mean age 59.6 yr) were recruited: group 1 n = 21, group 2 n = 24 and group 3 n = 22. A 78% follow-up was achieved at 6 months. There was a mean fall (SD) in AIMS II upper limb function 06 month change scores in group 1 of 1.00 (1.07). In groups 2 and 3 there was a mean increase in AIMS II scores of 0.18 (1.54) and 0.30 (1.22), respectively. The differences in AIMS change scores between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 were statistically significant (P = 0.007) and remained so after adjustment for multiple testing (P = 0.012).
Conclusion. Statistically significant improvements in arm function have been demonstrated following a programme of home-strengthening hand exercises in RA patients compared with simple stretches or advice alone.
KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Hand therapy, Exercise, Randomized controlled trial, Physiotherapy