Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2006
Rheumatology 2006 45(8):1029-1038; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel147
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/8/1029    most recent
kel147v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bansback, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bansback, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology 2006.

Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis

N. J. Bansback1, R. Ara1, N. Barkham2, A. Brennan1, A. D. Fraser2, P. Conway3, A. Reynolds3 and P. Emery2

1 Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield S1 4DA, 2 Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, LS3 9NZ and 3 Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Taplow, Maidenhead, Berks, SL6 0PH, UK

Correspondence to: Nick Bansback, Health Economics and Decision Science, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 40 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. E-mail: n.j.bansback{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Objectives. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has been shown to improve the outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We estimate the long-term impact on health status of prescribing the TNF antagonist etanercept, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness in a health economic model.

Methods. The relationship between disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and health state utility was explored to estimate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the TNF antagonist etanercept. A model was then used to compare sequences of treatments for PsA after failure of two conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). One arm commences on etanercept therapy and this is compared with a strategy commencing with combination therapy of methotrexate and ciclosporin and another commencing with leflunomide. Individual patient data from Phase III etanercept trials is used to populate the model supported by published evidence from extensive literature searches. By incorporating a life table specific for a PsA population, and using a number of evidence- and expert opinion-based assumptions for disease progression, the model was extended beyond the trial duration to a 10-yr time horizon. Cost offsets were produced by avoiding surgery through delayed progression; drug and monitoring costs were also modelled.

Results. Over the 10 yrs, modelled etanercept treatment gave 0.82 more QALYs when compared with combination therapy with methotrexate and ciclosporin, and 0.65 more QALYs in comparison with leflunomide. This equates to a central estimate for the cost per QALY of £28 189 and £28 189 for ciclosporin and leflunomide, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated this could vary by as much as ±28%.

Conclusions. With limited data currently available, the potential cost-effectiveness of etanercept in DMARD failures for adults with PsA appears encouraging. The result for other TNF antagonists will depend on how their relative efficacy and drug price compares with etanercept. A number of limitations are described and priorities for further research suggested.

KEY WORDS: Tumour necrosis factor, Health status, Cost-effectiveness, Cost utility, Economic evaluation, Psoriatic arthritis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
L. BARRA, J. E. POPE, and M. PAYNE
Real-World Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis: Cost-Effectiveness Based on Number Needed to Treat to Improve Health Assessment Questionnaire
J Rheumatol, July 1, 2009; 36(7): 1421 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Olivieri, S. de Portu, C. Salvarani, A. Cauli, E. Lubrano, A. Spadaro, F. Cantini, M. S. Cutro, A. Mathieu, M. Matucci-Cerinic, et al.
The psoriatic arthritis cost evaluation study: a cost-of-illness study on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy
Rheumatology, November 1, 2008; 47(11): 1664 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
Y. Bravo Vergel, N. S. Hawkins, K. Claxton, C. Asseburg, S. Palmer, N. Woolacott, I. N. Bruce, and M. J. Sculpher
The cost-effectiveness of etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis
Rheumatology, November 1, 2007; 46(11): 1729 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D L Scott, B Khoshaba, E H Choy, and G H Kingsley
Limited correlation between the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and EuroQol in rheumatoid arthritis: questionable validity of deriving quality adjusted life years from HAQ
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(11): 1534 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. M. Ara, A. V. Reynolds, and P. Conway
The cost-effectiveness of etanercept in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis in the UK
Rheumatology, August 1, 2007; 46(8): 1338 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.