Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 31, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(10):1557-1559; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem188
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/10/1557    most recent
kem188v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, N.
Right arrow Articles by Deighton, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, N.
Right arrow Articles by Deighton, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Is pre-assessment for anti-TNF therapy in RA necessary in the UK? Analysis of DAS28 in six centres

N. Smith, K. Gadsby, S. Butt, D. Carruthers1, A. Deeming1, J. Ledingham2, M. Fletcher2, D. Mulherin3, S. Roskell3, L. Kay4, K. Nicholl4, R. Cooper5, A. Worsley5 and C. Deighton

Department of Rheumatology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, 1Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals, 2Department of Rheumatology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, 3Department of Rheumatology, Cannock Chase Hospital, Cannock, 4Department of Rheumatology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne and 5Department of Rheumatology, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK.

Correspondence to: Dr Chris Deighton, Department of Rheumatology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, London Road, Derby, England, UK DE1 2QY. E-mail: chris.deighton{at}derbyhospitals.nhs.uk


   Abstract

Objectives. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) state that two pre-assessments of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) should be performed a month apart. We performed a retrospective audit of data from six centres to determine the stability of DAS28 between assessments, and the proportion of patients still satisfying eligibility criteria at baseline.

Methods. All RA patients assessed for anti-TNF from six centres had their pre-assessment DAS28 (DAS-1) compared with their baseline DAS28 (DAS0) using paired t-tests, and a similar analysis for the components of the DAS28. Patients who were no longer eligible for anti-TNF at DAS0 were noted.

Results. Six hundred and seventy-nine RA patients showed no significant change in the DAS28, with a mean DAS-1 of 6.74 and DAS0 of 6.73. (P = 0.86). Of the patients, 97.2% fulfilled the UK eligibility criteria at DAS0. Comparison of the individual components of the DAS28 between the two pre-assessment dates showed that there was no significant difference between either the numbers of swollen joints or the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), but there was a significant increase in the numbers of tender joints of 1.41 (P < 0.001) and in the visual analogue scale (VAS) of 4.22 (P < 0.001).

Discussion. The overwhelming majority of patients who fulfil eligibility criteria for anti-TNF drugs 1 month prior to baseline also fulfil the criteria at baseline. There is no significant change in the DAS28 over the month waiting to go onto anti-TNF therapy. A single assessment of the DAS28 would suffice to enable patients to go on to anti-TNF treatment.

Submitted 23 March 2007; revised version accepted 5 June 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Geens, P. Geusens, J. Vanhoof, H. Berghs, J. Praet, G. Esselens, S. Lens, J.-P. Dufour, M. Vandenberghe, X. Van Mullem, et al.
Belgian rheumatologists' perception on eligibility of RA patients for anti-TNF treatment matches more closely Dutch rather than Belgian reimbursement criteria
Rheumatology, May 1, 2009; 48(5): 546 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
B. Fautrel, R. M. Flipo, and A. Saraux
Eligibility of rheumatoid arthritis patients for anti-TNF-{alpha} therapy according to the 2005 recommendations of the French and British Societies for Rheumatology
Rheumatology, November 1, 2008; 47(11): 1698 - 1703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
N. Smith, T. Ding, S. Butt, K. Gadsby, and C. Deighton
The importance of the baseline Disease Activity Score 28 in determining responders and non-responders to anti-TNF in UK clinical practice
Rheumatology, September 1, 2008; 47(9): 1389 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.