Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 11, 2006
Rheumatology 2007 46(2):257-264; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel213
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
46/2/257    most recent
kel213v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckland-Wright, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tonkin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckland-Wright, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tonkin, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A 2 yr longitudinal radiographic study examining the effect of a bisphosphonate (risedronate) upon subchondral bone loss in osteoarthritic knee patients

J. C. Buckland-Wright, E. A. Messent, C. O. Bingham, III1, R. J. Ward and C. Tonkin

Department of Applied Clinical Anatomy, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, UK and 1Divisions of Rheumatology and Allergy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Correspondence to: Professor C. Buckland-Wright, Department of Applied Clinical Anatomy, King's College London School of Medicine, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Campus, London Bridge, London SE1 1UL, UK. E-mail: chris.buckland-wright{at}kcl.ac.uk


  Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether risedronate (RIS) slows down trabecular bone loss in the medial compartment of the proximal tibia, a characteristic of patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods. Initially, 100 patients were randomly selected from each treatment group (each N~300) comprising placebo and RIS 5 mg/day, 15 mg/day and 50 mg/week from a double blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, 2 yr investigation of OA knee patients in North America. Using fluoroscopic semi-flexed standard radiography, baseline and exit knee radiographs were digitized by laser scanner. Following computerized measurement of minimum medial compartment joint space width, each group was subdivided into joint space narrowing (JSN) non-progressor or JSN-progressor (JSN ≥0.6 mm measured at any point post-baseline). Computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) quantified longitudinal changes separately in horizontal and vertical trabeculae in region of interest (three-fourth width of tibial compartment x 6 mm height) in the medial compartment. Following the initial study, all JSN-progressor knees within the entire patient cohort (N = 1232) were similarly analysed.

Results. OA knees in JSN non-progressor group had a slight decrease in FSA for vertical and horizontal trabeculae and showed no drug effect. In JSN-progressor knees, bone loss was greater in both placebo and RIS 5 mg/day groups compared with those in RIS 15 mg/day group in which trabeculae were retained, and in the RIS 50 mg/week group in which the vertical trabecular number increased significantly (P < 0.05).

Conclusion. This preliminary study showed that patients with marked cartilage loss (JSN≥0.6 mm) receiving RIS 15 mg/day retained vertical trabecular structure, and those receiving RIS 50 mg/week increased vertical trabecular number, thereby preserving the structural integrity of subchondral bone in knee OA.

KEY WORDS: Osteoarthritis, Knee, Radiography, Bisphosphonates, Bone structure, Trabeculae, Risedronate

Submitted 29 March 2006; revised version accepted 12 May 2006.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. E. Wluka, Y. Wang, M. Davies-Tuck, D. R. English, G. G. Giles, and F. M. Cicuttini
Bone marrow lesions predict progression of cartilage defects and loss of cartilage volume in healthy middle-aged adults without knee pain over 2 yrs
Rheumatology, September 1, 2008; 47(9): 1392 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.