Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2006
Rheumatology 2007 46(5):796-800; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel407
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/5/796    most recent
kel407v2
kel407v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bird, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bird, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Patient knowledge and misconceptions of osteoarthritis assessed by a validated self-completed knowledge questionnaire (PKQ-OA)

J. Hill and H. Bird1

ACUMeN and 1University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS7 4SA, UK.

Correspondence to: J. Hill, ACUMeN, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS7 4SA, UK. E-mail: j.hill{at}leeds.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objectives. To design and validate an osteoarthritis (OA) patient knowledge questionnaire (PKQ-OA) and to use it to assess the patients’ level of knowledge of their disease, treatments and appropriate management techniques.

Methods. The PKQ-OA comprises 16 multiple choice questions with 30 correct answers. It was developed in two phases and tested for face validity, readability (Flesch Reading Index) and understanding, reliability (Kuder–Richardson Formula 20) and reproducibility (test/retest). The questionnaire was then used to assess knowledge of disease and management of OA in a cohort of 83 patients with established disease.

Results. The PKQ was found to be fairly easy to read, reliable (r = 0.75) and reproducible (r = 0.81; P < 0.01). The overall median score for the PKQ-OA was 19 ranging from 8 to 26. There was a highly significant association between the scores obtained and the number of years patients had spent in formal education, higher scores equating with greater length of education (P < 0.005). The majority of patients was knowledgeable about the symptoms of OA and exercise, but confused joint protection and energy conservation. The most worrying finding was the lack of knowledge regarding analgesics and some aspects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. Less than a third of patients knew that analgesics could be taken prophylactically and 70% did not know that they should be taken when pain starts to build. Among the patients 34% did not know that NSAIDs should be taken with or following food.

Conclusions. The PKQ-OA is a readable, reliable and reproducible questionnaire. It is quick to complete and score and could be used in out patient clinics or GP surgeries to assess knowledge of patients with OA.

KEY WORDS: Patient knowledge, Questionnaire, Osteoarthritis

Submitted 8 September 2006; Accepted 31 October 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. Hill, M. Lewis, and H. Bird
Do OA patients gain additional benefit from care from a clinical nurse specialist?--a randomized clinical trial
Rheumatology, June 1, 2009; 48(6): 658 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.