Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2008 47(1):92-95; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem315
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Healy, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Helliwell, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Healy, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Helliwell, P. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

MRI changes in psoriatic dactylitis—extent of pathology, relationship to tenderness and correlation with clinical indices

P. J. Healy1,2, C. Groves2, M. Chandramohan2 and P. S. Helliwell1,2

1Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds and 2Bradford Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, West Yorkshire, UK.

Correspondence to: P. Helliwell, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK. E-mail: p.helliwell{at}leeds.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objectives. To quantify the extent of inflammation in psoriatic dactylitis and to examine the relationship between clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in both tender and non-tender dactylitis.

Methods. Seventeen patients with psoriatic dactylitis underwent clinical assessment for 6 months after change of treatment, usually to methotrexate. Measures of dactylitis included the Leeds Dactylitis Index, the assessment tool used in the Infliximab in Psoriatic Arthritis Clinical Trial (IMPACT), a simple count of tender dactlylitic digits and a count of all dactylitic digits, both tender and non-tender. MRI scans of the affected hand or foot were performed before and after treatment using a 1.5T Siemen's scanner pre- and post-contrast.

Results. All patients improved clinically, as did their respective dactylitis scores and MRI images. The findings on MRI in both dactylitic and non-dactylitic digits were profound and widespread. The difference between tender and non-tender dactylitis was quantitative rather than qualitative. Synovitis and soft-tissue oedema were the most frequent abnormalities being present in 69% of tender dactylitic digits but bone oedema and flexor tenosynovitis were also frequently seen. Soft-tissue oedema was circumferential and enhancing and not limited to association with the flexor or extensor tendons. None of the clinical indices of dactylitis showed a close relationship to the extent of MRI abnormalities.

Conclusions. MRI images demonstrate widespread abnormalities in digits of people with psoriatic arthritis. Tender dactylitic digits have more abnormalities than other digits but the relationship between clinical and MRI scores is not strong.

KEY WORDS: Psoriatic arthritis, Dactylitis, Magnetic resonance imaging, Measurement, Outcome assessment, Clinical trials

Submitted 7 August 2007; revised version accepted 29 October 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
I. Olivieri, S. D'Angelo, E. Scarano, and A. Padula
What is the primary lesion in SpA dactylitis?
Rheumatology, May 1, 2008; 47(5): 561 - 562.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.