Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 2, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(10):1521-1526; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken318
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/10/1521    most recent
ken318v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, K.
Right arrow Articles by Strunk, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albrecht, K.
Right arrow Articles by Strunk, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diagnostics and Imaging Procedures
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reliability of different Doppler ultrasound quantification methods and devices in the assessment of therapeutic response in arthritis

K. Albrecht1, K. Grob1, U. Lange1, U. Müller-Ladner1 and J. Strunk1

1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Giessen, Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.

Correspondence to: K. Albrecht, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Giessen, Kerckhoff Klinik, Benekestr.2-8, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany. E-mail: k.albrecht{at}kerckhoff-klinik.de


   Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the metric qualities of power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) for different quantification methods and devices in the assessment of arthritis during anti-inflammatory treatment

Methods. Twenty-four patients with active arthritis and first-time treatment with the TNF-{alpha} inhibitor adalimumab underwent sequential clinical, laboratory and US examination at baseline, weeks 2, 6 and 12. 2D and 3D PDUS was performed by two independent investigators. The images and movies were scored from 0 to 3 and the amount of colour pixels and voxels was calculated. In addition, the resistance index of a synovial artery was measured. Thirteen patients were examined with a second US machine.

Results. Treatment response was already observed at week 2 with a significant reduction of 2D (P < 0.01) and 3D scores (P < 0.001). A moderate correlation to 28-joint disease activity score was found for 3D voxel count (rs = 0.35, P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was {kappa} or ICC ≥ 0.8 for all methods except the resistance index (ICC = 0.60). Intermachine agreement was {kappa} = 0.57 for 2D PDUS score.

Conclusions. The study demonstrates good to excellent interobserver and moderate intermachine reliability of different PDUS assessment methods in a longitudinal open-label study.

KEY WORDS: Power Doppler, Ultrasonography, 3D, Arthritis, Wrist

Submitted 11 April 2008; revised version accepted 7 July 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H.-R. Ziswiler, D. Aeberli, P. M. Villiger, and B. Moller
High-resolution ultrasound confirms reduced synovial hyperplasia following rituximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, August 1, 2009; 48(8): 939 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.