Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(11):1664-1670; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken320
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
47/11/1664    most recent
ken320v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivieri, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivieri, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Right arrow Pharmacology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The psoriatic arthritis cost evaluation study: a cost-of-illness study on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis patients with inadequate response to conventional therapy

I. Olivieri1, S. de Portu2, C. Salvarani3, A. Cauli4, E. Lubrano5, A. Spadaro6, F. Cantini7, M. S. Cutro1, A. Mathieu4, M. Matucci-Cerinic8, N. Pappone5, L. Punzi9, R. Scarpa10, L. G. Mantovani2,11 and for the PACE working group

1Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera, 2CIRFF/Center of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, 3Rheumatic Disease Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, 4Rheumatology Unit II, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, 5Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, Fondazione Maugeri IRCCS, Telese Terme, 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical and Therapeutical Clinic, University "La Sapienza", Rome, 7Rheumatic Disease Unit, 2nd Division of Medicine, Prato Hospital, Prato, 8Rheumatology Department, University of Florence, Florence, 9Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, 10Rheumatology Research Unit, University Federico II of Naples, Naples and 11Fondazione Charta, Milan, Italy.

Correspondence to: I. Olivieri, Rheumatology Department, Ospedale San Carlo, Contrada Macchia Romana, 85100 Potenza, Italy. E-mail: ignazioolivieri{at}tiscalinet.it; i.olivieri{at}ospedalesancarlo.it


   Abstract

Objective. To evaluate costs, benefits and cost–effectiveness of anti-TNF agents in PsA patients with inadequate response to conventional treatment.

Methods. A total of 107 patients, from nine Italian rheumatology centres, with different forms of PsA were given anti-TNF treatment, mainly etanercept (87%). Information on resource use, health-related quality of life, disease activity, function and laboratory values were collected at baseline and through out the 12 months of therapy. Cost (expressed in euro 2007) and utility (measured by EuroQol) before and after anti-TNF therapy initiation were compared in order to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and cost–effectiveness acceptability curve was calculated.

Results. At the end of 12 months, there was a significant increase in direct cost due to an increase of drug cost caused by TNF inhibitors that was only partially offset by the decrease in indirect cost. In the last 6 months of therapy, the direct cost increased by {euro}5052, the cost for the National Health System (NHS) by {euro}5044 and the social cost by {euro}4638. However, a gain of 0.12 QALY resulted in a cost per QALY gained of {euro}40 876 for the NHS and of {euro}37 591 for the society. The acceptability curve showed that there would be a 97% likelihood that anti-TNF therapy would be considered cost-effective at willingness-to-pay threshold of {euro}60 000 per QALY gained.

Conclusion. Cost–effectiveness ratios are within the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold. These results need to be confirmed in larger samples of patients.

KEY WORDS: Psoriatic arthritis, Anti-tumour necrosis factor, Cost–effectiveness, Quality-adjusted life year

Submitted 11 December 2007; revised version accepted 8 July 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
E. MUSACCHIO, C. VALVASON, C. BOTSIOS, F. OSTUNI, A. FURLAN, R. RAMONDA, V. MODESTI, L. SARTORI, and L. PUNZI
The Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-blocking Agent Infliximab Inhibits Interleukin 1ss (IL-1ss) and IL-6 Gene Expression in Human Osteoblastic Cells
J Rheumatol, August 1, 2009; 36(8): 1575 - 1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.