Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2008 47(Supplement 5):v46-v47; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken310
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matucci-Cerinic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seibold, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matucci-Cerinic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Seibold, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Rheumatology issue: Update in systemic sclerosis [View the issue table of contents]

Digital ulcers and outcomes assessment in scleroderma

M. Matucci-Cerinic1 and J. R. Seibold2

1Division of Rheumatology, AOUC, Department of Biomedicine, Denothe Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy and 2University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan, MI, USA.

Correspondence to: J. R. Seibold, University of Michigan Scleroderma Program, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, PO Box 481, Lobby M, Suite 2500, Ann Arbor, Michigan, MI 48106, USA. E-mail: jseibold{at}umich.edu


   Abstract

Ischaemic ulcerations of the fingertips are common in SSc and a source of pain and disability. Healing has been demonstrated with intravenous iloprost and two studies with bosentan have demonstrated reduction in the occurrence of new digital ulcers (DUs) over 4–6 months of treatment. Both bosentan studies showed no benefit in healing DU and because of this, net DU burden is no different between drug and placebo and accordingly secondary measures of outcome including pain and hand functionality are inconsistently affected. While it is likely an artefact, it remains unclear that current outcome measures including the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), the UK Functional Score and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire are sensitive to change in the domain of digital ischaemia. Major events including amputation and hospitalization occur too infrequently to serve as practical measures of outcome in trials. Future studies of DU therapies will benefit from development of an ulcer-specific measure of outcome.

KEY WORDS: Digital ulcers, Scleroderma, Systemic sclerosis, Outcome measures

Submitted 1 May 2008; Accepted 3 July 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.