Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 18, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(10):1283-1289; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep239
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/10/1283    most recent
kep239v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sato, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The effect of etanercept on work productivity in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COMET study

Aslam Anis1,2, Wei Zhang2, Paul Emery3, Huiying Sun2, Amitabh Singh4, Bruce Freundlich5 and Reiko Sato4

1School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada, 3Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds University, Leeds, UK, 4Global Health Outcomes Assessment and 5Global Medical Affairs, Wyeth, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Correspondence to: Aslam Anis, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, 620-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada. E-mail: aslam.anis{at}ubc.ca


   Abstract

Objectives. To compare the impact of the combination of etanercept (ETN) and MTX with MTX alone on work productivity among MTX-naïve patients with active early RA over a 12-month period.

Methods. The COMET (COmbination of Methotrexate and ETanercept) trial was a 2-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. Absenteeism during the first year was measured and it included: (i) number of missed workdays; (ii) reduced working time; and (iii) number of stopped workdays. Each absenteeism measure was estimated using a mixed model, and their variations were estimated by bootstrapping. As a sensitivity analysis, the lost workdays due to presenteeism (reduced performance at work) was also estimated.

Results. Two hundred and five patients [MTX (n = 100) vs ETN + MTX (n = 105)], who were working full time or part time at baseline and had at least one follow-up observation, were included in the analysis. Compared with the MTX group, the ETN + MTX group had a maximum of 37 fewer missed workdays or at minimum 22 fewer missed workdays. The associated productivity gain equalled £2586 and £1555, respectively. When additionally accounting for presenteeism, the total improvement could be as high as 42 (95% CI 16, 69) fewer lost workdays representing a productivity gain of £2968.

Conclusions. Our results demonstrated that early treatment with ETN + MTX led to a significant attenuation of absenteeism among patients with early active RA. These productivity gains represent benefit beyond the traditional measures of clinical and radiographic improvements. Further research to simultaneously measure both absenteeism and presenteeism is warranted.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Etanercept, Work productivity

Submitted 22 January 2009; revised version accepted 9 July 2009.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.