Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(11):1442-1446; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep278
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/11/1442    most recent
kep278v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ricca, L. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ricca, L. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crystal Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

An analysis of MRI and ultrasound imaging in patients with gout who have normal plain radiographs

John D. Carter1, Rajendra P. Kedar2, Scott R. Anderson2, Angie H. Osorio1, Nancy L. Albritton1, Shanmugapriya Gnanashanmugam1, Joanne Valeriano1, Frank B. Vasey1 and Louis R. Ricca1

1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of South Florida and 2Radiology Associates of Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA.

Correspondence to: John D. Carter, Division of Rheumatology, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, USA. E-mail: jocarter{at}health.usf.edu


   Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to analyse the prevalence of occult destructive arthropathy in subjects with gout and normal plain radiographs by utilizing MRI and ultrasound (US).

Methods. The study consisted of two visits. At Visit 1, a plain radiograph of the ‘index joint’ was obtained. The ‘index joint’ was defined as a joint that has had the most acute attacks of gout historically. The index joint plain radiograph had to be free of erosive damage in order for the subject to qualify for Visit 2. At Visit 2, the subject had an MRI with contrast and an US of the index joint. Each subject also had an MRI and US of an ‘asymptomatic joint’. The ‘asymptomatic joint’ was defined as a joint that had never experienced an acute attack of gout (determined by standard protocol). The primary endpoint was erosive changes on the MRI and/or US of the index joint. Secondary endpoints included erosive changes on the asymptomatic joint as well as bone marrow oedema (BME) (on MRI), synovial pannus (SP), soft tissue tophi (STT) or oedema (STE) on either the index or asymptomatic joint.

Results. Twenty-seven subjects (26 males; 1 female) completed both visits. Their average age and disease duration were 55.1 years (range 21–75 years) and 6.8 years (range 0.25–25 years), respectively. The subjects’ average serum uric acid level over the past 5 years was 8.09 mg/dl (range 4.1–12.8 mg/dl); their average on the day of Visit 1 was 7.96 mg/dl (range 4.6–13.9 mg/dl). The first MTP was the most common index joint (17) followed by the ankle (5), mid-tarsal (2), knee (2) and wrist (1). The knee was the most common asymptomatic joint (21) followed by the wrist (3), MTP (2) and ankle (1). All subjects had both MRIs; one subject refused the US. Out of 27 subjects, 15 (56%) had erosions on MRI of their index joint (P < 0.0001); only 1 subject (4%) had erosions identified in the index joint by US (P = NS). Regarding the secondary endpoints on the index joint, the MRI detected SP (13), BME (4), STE (3) and STT (0); the US detected SP (1), STT (1) and STE (0). Regarding the MRI of the asymptomatic joint, positive findings included SP (3), BME (3), STE (2) and erosions (1). There were no positive findings by US in the asymptomatic joint.

Conclusions. A large percentage of patients with gout and normal plain radiographs have occult destructive arthropathy that is only detected by advanced imaging such as MRI and/or US. However, MRI appears to be much more sensitive than US at detecting these findings.

KEY WORDS: Gout, MRI, Ultrasonography, Synovial pannus, Joint destruction, Plain radiograph, X-ray

Submitted 3 April 2009; revised version accepted 31 July 2009.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.