Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2009 48(2):170-175; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken448
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tugwell, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tugwell, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Validation of a simple activity participation measure for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials

T. Li1, G. Wells2, R. Westhovens3 and P. Tugwell4

1Global Health Outcomes, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 3Department of Rheumatology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and 4Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Correspondence to: T. Li, Global Health Outcomes, P.O. Box 4000, Mail stop J23-02, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA. E-mail: tracy.li{at}bms.com


   Abstract

Objective. To examine the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the Activity Participation Questionnaire (APaQ), a simple measure of activity participation for patients with RA.

Methods. The questionnaire contained two items: (i) number of days in the past month of being unable to perform one's usual activities because of RA; and (ii) a score measuring how often one's usual activities could be completed. The APaQ was administered to 1043 RA patients in two clinical trials of abatacept. Construct validity was evaluated by examining changes from baseline in activity scores by clinical response measured by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and ACR criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA) state and by correlations with patient-reported outcome measures of physical function, disease activity, pain and fatigue at study end-point. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability and sensitivity to change were assessed.

Results. Both activity participation items were significantly associated with levels of EULAR and ACR response and the achievement of MDA state (P < 0.0005 for all comparisons). Moderate correlations with patient-reported outcomes were consistently found (correlations 0.5–0.6). Cronbach's {alpha} was 0.7 indicating good internal consistency, the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.6 suggesting acceptable test–retest reliability. Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by the treatment differences and the standardized response mean (0.39 and 0.30) for the two activity items.

Conclusion. The APaQ is a simple, reliable and valid measure of patient activity, which is sensitive to change, suggesting its suitability for use in clinical trials.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Activity participation, Quality of life, Abatacept

Submitted 31 July 2008; revised version accepted 11 November 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of Rheumatology SupplementHome page
G. A. WELLS
Patient-Driven Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis
J Rheumatol Suppl, June 1, 2009; 82(0): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.