Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 5, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(8):953-957; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/8/953    most recent
kep142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddouk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Masmoudi, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haddouk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Masmoudi, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clinical and diagnostic value of ribosomal P autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Samy Haddouk1, Sameh Marzouk2, Moez Jallouli2, Hajer Fourati1, Makram Frigui2, Youssef B. H. Hmida1, Faten Koubaa1, Wassim Sellami3, Sofiene Baklouti4, Jamil Hachicha5, Zouheir Bahloul2 and Hatem Masmoudi1

1Immunology Laboratory, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital of Sfax, 2Department of Medicine, 3Department of Psychiatry, 4Department of Rheumatology and 5Department of Nephrology, Hédi Chaker University Hospital of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.

Correspondence to: Samy Haddouk, Laboratoire d’Immunologie, Chu Habib Bourguiba, 3029 Sfax, Tunisia. E-mail: hadsamy{at}yahoo.fr


   Abstract

Objective. To analyse prospectively the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as the clinical relevance of ribosomal P (anti-P) autoantibodies in a large cohort of SLE patients.

Methods. The anti-P autoantibodies were evaluated in the serum of 200 Tunisian SLE patients at disease onset and 130 various control subjects by a sensitive immunodot assay. A complete laboratory evaluation and clinical examination were performed in each SLE patient. During the follow-up, the patients were regularly monitored for clinical parameters. Global SLE activity was measured by the ECLAM.

Results. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-P testing for SLE were 23.5 and 98.4%, respectively. The anti-P-positive samples 14/47 (29.8%), 27/47 (57.4%) and 5/47 (10.6%) were negative for anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm or both antibodies, respectively. The anti-P-positive patients showed more active disease activity and a much higher prevalence of arthritis. An association between IgG aCLs and anti-P antibodies was also found. However, anti-P antibodies were not associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations or lupus nephritis.

Conclusion. This study does not seem to confirm the described association of anti-P antibodies with neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. However, it supports the anti-P antibody association with arthritis and disease activity as well as the presence of aCL. Based on our study and other related studies, we propose that, akin to anti-Sm and anti-dsDNA, anti-P antibodies detected by one agreed method may be considered for inclusion as a criterion for the classification of SLE.

KEY WORDS: Anti-ribosomal P antibodies, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sensitivity, Specificity, Clinical associations

Submitted 26 December 2008; revised version accepted 24 April 2009.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.