Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peto, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peto, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983 All rights reserved

Statistics: What treatments for rheumatoid arthritis can best be assessed by large, simple, long-term trials?

R. Peto


  Abstract

If the really important questions in the long-term management of rheumatoid arthritis are to be answered reliably, then clinical trials may have to be undertaken that are very much larger and simpler than has previously been the case. For sufficient numbers of busy clinicians to collaborate wholeheartedly with such trials, the extra work per patient should be very slight. In addition, the collaborators should be more than recompensed for even that slight extra trouble by pro-rata secretarial and/or locum assistance, so that it will actually be less work for them to collaborate wholeheartedly in such a trial than not to do so. Two particular trials are discussed to illustrate these general principles.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.