Skip Navigation



Rheumatology Advance Access published online on September 29, 2009

Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep314
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/12/1557    most recent
kep314v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quartuccio, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Vita, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quartuccio, L.
Right arrow Articles by De Vita, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rheumatoid factor positivity rather than anti-CCP positivity, a lower disability and a lower number of anti-TNF agents failed are associated with response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis

Luca Quartuccio1, Martina Fabris1, Sara Salvin1, Fabiola Atzeni2, Marta Saracco3, Maurizio Benucci4, Marco Cimmino5, Pia Morassi6, Paola Masolini1, Raffaele Pellerito3, Maurizio Cutolo5, Piercarlo Sarzi Puttini2 and Salvatore De Vita1

1Clinica di Reumatologia, DPMSC, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "S. Maria della Misericordia", University of Udine, Udine, 2U.O. di Reumatologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario L. Sacco, Milano, 3U.O.A. di Reumatologia, Ospedale Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, 4U.O.S di Reumatologia, Nuovo Ospedale S. Giovanni di Dio, Firenze, 5Clinica di Reumatologia, University of Genova, Genova and 6S.S. di Reumatologia, S.C. III Medica, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedali Riuniti", Trieste, Italy.

Correspondence to: Salvatore De Vita, Rheumatology Clinic, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "S. Maria della Misericordia", University of Udine, P.z.le S. Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100 Udine, Italy. E-mail: devita.salvatore{at}aoud.sanita.fvg.it


   Abstract

Objectives. We explored clinical factors associated with a major response to rituximab (RTX) (e.g. ACR >=50, and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) moderate to good response) in patients with active long-standing RA and inadequate response to anti-TNF agents or traditional DMARDs.

Methods. RTX was used in 110 RA patients in six different Italian centres. The mean disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28) was 6.4 ± 0.99 and the mean HAQ was 1.63 ± 0.68 at baseline. Thirty-two patients (29.1%) underwent RTX after the failure of DMARD therapy, 37 (33.6%) had failed or were intolerant to at least two anti-TNF agents, and 41 (37.3%) had failed or were intolerant to one anti-TNF agent. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results. The number of previous anti-TNF agents (P = 0.043), HAQ (P = 0.023), RF positivity (P < 0.0001) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positivity (P = 0.003) were associated with ACR response >=50 between month +4 and month +6 after starting RTX by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a lower HAQ, a lower number of anti-TNF agents failed before RTX and RF positivity, but not anti-CCP positivity, were the selected variables associated with an ACR response >=50, with an accuracy of 84% of the model. Only RF positivity correlated with EULAR moderate to good response both in the univariate and in the multivariate analysis, with an accuracy of 79% of the model.

Conclusion. RF-positive rather than anti-CCP-positive RA patients with lower baseline disability and a lower number of previously failed TNF blockers may be the best candidates to RTX.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Rituximab, Rheumatoid factor, Anti-CCP, Anti-TNF, DMARDs

Submitted 6 April 2009; revised version accepted 27 August 2009.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.