Rheumatology 2000; 39: 2-5
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology
Editorials |
Resistant rheumatoid arthritis clinics a necessary development?
Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ, UK
Rheumatologists have always been aware of the limitations of the therapy available to them. For many years the drugs used on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) produced such a high withdrawal rate due to both toxicity and the lack of efficacy that there was some doubt whether they had any impact on the underlying disease at all. With better study design and more efficient use of drugs it is now clear that disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) do alter the disease course as evidenced by retardation of bony erosions and improvement in function [1]. However, conventional therapy has many well-recognized toxicities and is still incompletely effective, with few patients entering remission. A major change in prescribing in rheumatology is about to occur with the licensing of several new drugs including the pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor leflunomide (Arava) and two tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents etanacept (Enbrel) and infliximab (Remicade).
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Gause Progress in the treatment of rheumatic disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 13 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Quinn, P. G. Conaghan, and P. Emery The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence? Rheumatology, November 1, 2001; 40(11): 1211 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Porter, S. Bingham, and P. Emery Re: Bingham and Emery. Resistant rheumatoid arthritis clinics--a necessary development? Rheumatology, October 1, 2000; 39(10): 1154 - 1155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

