Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Emery, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2000; 39: 689-692
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology


Editorials

Leflunomide, a new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug and the never ending rheumatoid arthritis story

J. S. Smolen1,2,, W. B. Graninger1 and P. Emery3

1 Department of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine III, Vienna General Hospital, University of Vienna,
2 Second Department of Medicine—Centre for the Rheumatic Diseases, Lainz Hospital, Vienna, Austria and
3 Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The standard approach to the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been revised during the last decade. Traditionally a treatment pyramid [1, 2] was used but this has been challenged [3–9]. In particular, the original philosophy which fostered a ‘wait and see [with or without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)]’ attitude has been taken apart and replaced by the demand ‘Treat now, not later!’ [10]. As a result, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are now initiated more as early in the disease course as possible, i.e. as soon as an accurate diagnosis is made [10–12]. Many issues are unresolved, including: (a) the definition of ‘early RA’, since most studies of so-called early RA have dealt with patients who had the disease for 1, 2 or even more years [13]; (b) how to reduce the period between onset . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?