Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on August 9, 2006
Rheumatology 2006 45(10):1185-1186; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel247
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
EDITORIALS |
Quality of pain in systemic sclerosis
Rheumatology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Correspondence to: Patricia E. Carreira, Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Avda. de Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: carreira@h12o.es
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the last three decades, measurement of quality of life has become a standard tool to evaluate the impact of disease and therapies in the field of rheumatology. For many years, patient's questionnaires were considered weak subjective measures compared with stronger objective measures assessed by health professionals. Nevertheless, this point of view changed for many rheumatologists after the demonstration that patient's questionnaire scores are able to predict mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) more effectively than any traditional measure [1]. Patient-reported outcomes give fundamental information about patient's health, functional status, disease symptoms, treatment preferences, satisfaction and quality of life from their own perspective. The two more extended tools to evaluate quality of life in rheumatic patients are the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Short-Form 36 (SF-36). The HAQ was developed for patients with rheumatic diseases, namely RA, in 1980 [2].