Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on November 28, 2006
Rheumatology 2007 46(4):561-562; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel398
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
EDITORIALS |
Celecoxib and CVS risklessons from the APC and PreSAP studies
Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Durham, North Road, Durham
Correspondence to: D. J. Armstrong. E-mail: oswald17727@hotmail.com
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Since the return of Robin Goodfellow to the land of the faeries, we mortal rheumatologists have had to scan the general medical press ourselves for items of arthritic interest. One wonders what Robin might have made of the two large trials of celecoxib for the prevention of colonic adenomatous polyps recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine [1, 2], and of the generally negative view of the accompanying editorial [3] with respect to balancing risks and benefits. If coxibs are too dangerous to use to prevent pre-malignant polyps (he might have asked), can one safely assume they are too dangerous to prescribe for sore knees?
A total of over 3000