Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(8):1219-1220; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem083
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
EDITORIALS |
30 million, around 10 000 ... and 18 ... Figuring out the optimal treatment for musculoskeletal conditions in the National Health Service
Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London,
Division of Medicine, Room 331, 3rd Floor, 46 Cleveland Street,
London W1T 4JF, UK.
Correspondence to: D. A. Isenberg. E-mail: d.isenberg@ucl.ac.uk
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The Independent newspaper published in the UK is fond of printing front pages consisting mostly of numbers that highlight particular aspects of the story they are covering. It certainly catches the readers attention. I would urge that any rheumatologist in the UK to bear in mind the figures 30 million, around 10 000 and 18 when they practice their subspecialty.
The figure of 30 million—pounds—was the number given to members of the Executive Committee of the British Society for Rheumatology involved in discussions with officials from the Department of Health in drawing up the Musculoskeletal Services Framework—A Joint Responsibility: Doing It Differently [1]—and refers to the weekly cost to the UK of disability benefit due to musculoskeletal diseases. This huge figure, apart from being second only to psychiatric conditions amongst the subspecialties, also fails to take into account the cost of lack of productivity amongst