Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on February 20, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(5):462-463; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/5/462    most recent
kep025v2
kep025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

EDITORIALS

Statistical guidelines for submission of papers—revised 2008

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Most studies, whether laboratory or clinical, generate numerical data and interpretation of the findings depends as much on the statistical handling of the results as it does on the quality of the methods used for data collection. The major weakness in most publications is the absence of relevant pieces of information that allow the reader to interpret the study and compare it with the findings of others.

Reporting guidelines for specific types of research studies are readily available from the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network website [1]. This . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Objective(s) of the study
Description of the methods used
Subjects/Patients
Statistical methods
Presentation of results
Data presentation in the text
Data presentation in tables and figures
Interpretation of results

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Thomas and C. J. Dore
Statistical guidelines for contributors to Rheumatology
Rheumatology, May 1, 2009; 48(5): 461 - 461.
[Full Text] [PDF]