Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 13, 2009
Rheumatology 2009 48(9):1019-1020; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep196
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/9/1019    most recent
kep196v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Estrach, C.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Estrach, C.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Editorial

Why aren't we all doing ultrasound?

Cristina Estrach1 and Robert N. Thompson1

1Rheumatology Department, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to: Cristina Estrach, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. E-mail: cristina.estrach@aintree.nhs.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MUS) is potentially the most exciting development in clinical rheumatology practice in recent years. It is readily accessible, patient friendly and relatively inexpensive. It can be used to detect small joint effusions and thus increase the accuracy of diagnostic aspiration and therapeutic injection [1]. It is more sensitive than clinical examination in detecting enthesitis [2] and seven times more sensitive than X-ray in detecting small erosions [3]. It is in the area of detection of early synovitis, however, where the greatest potential lies. MUS can detect subclinical inflammation and is comparable with MRI in this respect [4, 5], a phenomenon that may explain the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
T. Garrood and P. Platt
Access to training in musculoskeletal ultrasound: a survey of UK rheumatology trainees
Rheumatology, October 7, 2009; (2009) kep319v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]