Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klemp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klemp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 491-492
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology


Letters to the Editor

Reply

P. Klemp and S. Williams1

Departments of Rheumatology and
1 Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand

We thank Grahame and Bird for the interest shown in our paper on articular mobility in New Zealanders [1] and for their comments.

Generalized hypermobility is genetically determined [2] and our aim was to document prevalence estimates for generalized hypermobility (Beighton's mobility score >=4/9) in Maori and European New Zealanders. We excluded pauciarticular hypermobility from the analysis because it can be acquired as well as being genetic in origin [35]. We do not believe that our prevalence figures are biased or skewed because they were for generalized hypermobility only. In our opinion, for pauciarticular hypermobility to be included in population studies, sites of acquired hypermobility should be excluded from the mobility scores—a daunting undertaking—to avoid potentially serious bias in prevalence estimates.

Our data were collected before the new diagnostic criteria [6, 7] for hypermobility syndrome were proposed—a point we made clear in our paper. We therefore agree that our definition of hypermobility syndrome is outdated, but we do not agree that our methodology is outdated. Beighton's score remains the most commonly used mobility scoring system in clinical and epidemiological studies.

Table 1Go shows prevalence estimates for mobility scores 1 to 3 in our sample. These scores may include sites of acquired hypermobility. As for the prevalence estimates of mobility scores >=4/9, there were differences for gender after adjusting for ethnicity and age, but no differences for ethnicity after adjusting for age and gender. When mobility scores 1 to 3 were combined with scores >=4/9 there were also differences for gender after adjusting for age and ethnicity, but no differences for ethnicity after adjusting for age and gender.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Prevalence of mobility scores 1 to 3 in Maori and European males and females

 

Notes

Correspondence to: P. Klemp. E-mail: klemps{at}xtra.co.nz Back

References

  1. Klemp P, Williams SM, Stansfield SA. Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders. Rheumatology 2002;4:554–7.
  2. Child AH. Joint hypermobility syndrome: inherited disorder of collagen synthesis. J Rheumatol 1986;13:239–43.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Beighton P, Grahame R, Bird HA. Hypermobility of joints, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
  4. Klemp P, Chalton D. Articular mobility in ballet dancers. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:72–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Klemp P. Hypermobility. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:573–5.[Free Full Text]
  6. Mishra MB, Ryan P, Atkinson P et al. Extra-articular features of benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:861–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Grahame R, Bird HA, Child A et al. The British Society for Rheumatology Special Interest Group on Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue Criteria for Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome. The Revised (Brighton 1998) Criteria for the Diagnosis of BJHS. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1777–9.[ISI][Medline]
Accepted 27 August 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klemp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klemp, P.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?