Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2006
Rheumatology 2007 46(2):364-365; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel404
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/2/364    most recent
kel404v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spies, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spies, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Membrane glucocorticoid receptors (mGCR) on monocytes are up-regulated after vaccination

C. M. Spies, B. Bartholome, T. Berki1, G-.R. Burmester, A. Radbruch2, A. Scheffold2 and F. Buttgereit

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany, 1Department of Immunology and Biotechnology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary and 2German Arthritis Research Centre (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany

Correspondence to: C. M. Spies. E-mail: cornelia.spies{at}charite.de

SIR, Glucocorticoids are essential in limiting and resolving the inflammatory process in health and disease [1, 2]. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids rely on several molecular mechanisms, which include (i) direct effects on gene expression by the binding of activated glucocorticoid receptors (GCRs) to glucocorticoid responsive elements, (ii) indirect effects on gene expression through the interactions of activated GCR with transcription factors such as nuclear factor-{kappa}B or activator protein 1, (iii) glucocorticoid signalling through membrane-associated receptors and second messengers (so-called specific non-genomic pathways) and (iv) non-specific non-genomic actions via interactions of the glucocorticoid molecules with biological membranes at very high concentrations [2, 3].

Membrane glucocorticid receptors (mGCRs) have been reported for amphibian neuronal membranes and human lymphoma cells [4, 5]. We recently detected mGCR on the surface of human monocytes and B-lymphocytes by means of high-sensitivy immunofluorescence, and presented evidence for a higher expression of mGCR on monocytes following immunostimulation with lipopolysaccharide in vitro as well as in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [6, 7]. In RA, mGCR are up-regulated and positively correlated to disease activity [6]. In SLE, we did not find a correlation to disease activity but a down-regulation of mGCR induced by high-dosage glucocorticoid-therapy [7]. This study aimed at further investigating if also a defined immunostimulation, such as vaccination, is capable of up-regulating these receptors.

We examined peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from 21 healthy vaccinees (11 women and 10 men, aged 18–53 yrs, mean age 32.6 ± 8.6 yrs) before vaccination, after 3 weeks of vaccination, and after 6 weeks of vaccination. Ethics Committee (Charité) approval was secured and written informed consent was obtained. Vaccination was performed as a matter of routine. Probands showing signs of infection 8 weeks before or following vaccination were excluded. Different types of vaccines were used. We included vaccinations against tetanus (n = 10), hepatitis B (n = 7) and influenza (n = 4), respectively. PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation as described previously [6, 7]. For immunofluorescence analysis, a monoclonal IgG1-antibody anti-GCR 5E4 directed against the conserved regulatory sequence of human GCR (aa150–176) conjugated to digoxigenin (Dig) (Roche) was used [8]. The mGCRs were detected by high-sensitivity flow cytometry using anti-GCR-Dig followed by anti-Dig-magnetofluorescent liposomes [9] as described previously [6, 7]. We also used anti-CD14-phycoerythrin, anti-CD19-allophycocyanin and anti-CD3-peridin-chlorophyll (Becton Dickinson) to identify the different cell types. Further details have been previously reported [6, 7]. We considered the frequency of mGCR-positive cells to be increased above the normal range, if it was higher than the highest value found in a previously examined large control group of healthy probands, i.e. >9.2% in monocytes (CD14+) and >12.3% in B-lymphocytes (CD19+); in T-lymphocytes (CD3+) a significant mGCR expression had not been detectable (n = 58) [7].

As shown in Fig. 1, 3 weeks after vaccination the frequency of mGCR-positive monocytes (CD14+) was increased above the normal range in four of the 21 vaccinees (19.0%), with values up to 19.9% mGCR-positive cells. Six weeks after vaccination two of the probands (9.5%) showed elevated frequencies. These two probands had been positive at 3 weeks, too. Interestingly, these two ‘long-reacting’ individuals were male, whereas the other two positive probands were female. Three of the four positive vaccinees had been vaccinated against tetanus and one against influenza. None of the hepatitis-B vaccinees reacted (although a follow-up measurement of the anti-HBs-titre did show a sufficient vaccination). Whilst mGCR-expression increased in a minority of individuals, there was a decrease in many others so that the median stayed the same at 3 weeks, and was numerically even somewhat lower 6 weeks after vaccination (2.5 vs 2.8 vs 2.0%). Vaccination did not have any measurable effect on the frequency of mGCR-positive B-lymphocytes (CD19+). T-lymphocytes (CD3+) were found to be mGCR-negative either before as well as after vaccination. Our previously published data on mGCR expression in rheumatic diseases showed the frequency of mGCR-positive monocytes (CD14+) to be increased in nine of the 19 examined RA-patients (47.4%) with values up to 19.6% mGCR-positive cells and in 10 of 33 SLE-patients (30.3%) with a maximum value of 35.4%, respectively [6, 7].


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. Frequency of mGCR+ cells before vaccination, after 3 weeks of vaccination, and after mGCR+ 6 weeks of vaccination among (A) monocytes (CD14+), (B) B-lymphocytes (CD19+) and (C) T-lymphocytes (CD3+). Line represents the absolute maximum value of a previously examined large control group of healthy probands [7].

 
We conclude mGCR to be up-regulated in patients with rheumatic diseases as well as following vaccination. This supports the hypothesis that mGCR are up-regulated by immunostimulation and not to be specifically involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. We suggest a role of mGCR within a negative feedback loop to control glucocorticoid action [6]. However, only a small number of vaccinees had elevated levels of mGCR-positive monocytes as compared with RA- and SLE-patients. The highest frequency of mGCR-positive monocytes was found in SLE-patients whereas lower but similar frequencies occurred in RA-patients and vaccinees. This leads to the conclusion that vaccination is obviously a less strong immunostimulus as compared with rheumatic diseases, at least if induction of mGCR-expression is used as an outcome parameter.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank B. Hörner from the Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin for the support.

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Webster JI, Tonelli L, Sternberg EM. (2002) Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 20:125–63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Rhen T and Cidlowski JA. (2005) Antiinflammatory Action of Glucocorticoids – New Mechanisms for Old Drugs. N Engl J Med 353:1711–23.[Free Full Text]
  3. Buttgereit F, Straub RH, Wehling M, Burmester GR. (2004) Glucocorticoids in the treatment of rheumatic diseases: an update on the mechanisms of action. Arthritis Rheum 50:3408–17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Orchinik M, Murray TF, Moore FL. (1991) A corticosteroid receptor in neuronal membranes. Science 252:1848–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gametchu B, Watson CS, Wu S. (1993) Use of receptor antibodies to demonstrate membrane glucocorticoid receptor in cells from human leukemic patients. FASEB J 7:1283–92.[Abstract]
  6. Bartholome B, Spies CM, Gaber T, et al. (2004) Membrane glucocorticoid receptors (mGCR) are expressed in normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and up-regulated after in vitro stimulation and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. FASEB J 18:70–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Spies CM, Schaumann DHS, Berki T, et al. (2006) Membrane glucocorticoid receptors (mGCR) are down-regulated by glucocorticoids in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and use a caveolin-1 independent expression pathway. Ann Rheum Dis 65:1139–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Berki T, Kumanovics G, Kumanovics A, Falus A, Ujhelyi E, Nemeth P. (1998) Production and flow cytometric application of a monoclonal anti-glucocorticoid receptor antibody. J Immunol Methods 214:19–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Scheffold A, Assenmacher M, Reiners-Schramm L, Lauster R, Radbruch A. (2000) High-sensitivity immunofluorescence for detection of the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines gamma interferon and interleukin-10 on the surface of cytokine-secreting cells. Nat Med 6:107–10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted 31 October 2006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/2/364    most recent
kel404v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spies, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spies, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buttgereit, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Autoimmunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?