Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on February 16, 2007
Rheumatology 2007 46(4):565-571; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel437
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/4/565    most recent
kel437v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coppieters, K.
Right arrow Articles by Elewaut, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coppieters, K.
Right arrow Articles by Elewaut, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Experimental Arthritis
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


REVIEWS

NKT cells: manipulable managers of joint inflammation

K. Coppieters, P. Dewint, K. Van Beneden, P. Jacques, S. Seeuws, G. Verbruggen, D. Deforce1 and D. Elewaut

Laboratory for Molecular Immunology & Inflammation, Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital and 1Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence to: Dirk Elewaut, Ghent University Hospital Laboratory for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Rheumatology, 185 De Pintelaan, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: Dirk.Elewaut{at}UGent.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The importance of T cell participation in the aetiology and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is now widely appreciated. The disease is mediated by activated pro-inflammatory, self-reactive T helper cells, instigating the chronic autoimmune response characteristic of rheumatoid inflammation. Natural killer T (NKT) cells are a distinctive population of T cells thought to protect self-tissues from damaging inflammatory immune responses, and are often recognized as a regulatory T cell subtype, regulating the magnitude or class of the immune response. Recently, a number of studies have provided insight concerning the role of NKT cells in different models of autoimmune joint inflammation, suggesting the involvement of this specialized T cell subset in controlling initiation and perpetuation of arthritic disease. The aim of this review is to provide rheumatologists with an introduction of the principal features of NKT cells, to give an overview of the data obtained in animal models of arthritis and to discuss the hypothesized mechanisms. Finally, we will speculate on future prospects with regard to NKT cell-targeted treatment of arthritic disease by use of glycolipids.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, NKT cells, Cytokines, Inflammation, Mouse, Autoimmunity


    Introduction: NKT cells and autoimmunity
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
A link between iNKT cells and autoimmunity was initially suggested by the finding that several mouse strains that are genetically susceptible to autoimmunity [i.e. type-1 diabetes, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)] as well as patients with type-1 diabetes, systemic sclerosis (SSc), multiple sclerosis, SLE and RA have reduced iNKT cell numbers and show functional iNKT cell deficiencies [1].

In contrast to conventional CD4+ T cells, which are activated by peptide antigens in the context of a specific MHC class II molecule expressed on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell (APC) [2]; NKT cells typically recognize glycolipid antigens bound by the MHC class I-like protein CD1d [3]. They represent a subset of innate-like lymphocytes that share receptor structures and functions with both conventional T cells and NKT cells [4]. Classical, so called ‘type-1’, NKT cells express an invariant TCRalpha chain encoded by a Valpha14-Jalpha18 rearrangement in mice [5] and Valpha24-Jalpha18 in humans [6, 7]. These cells recognize the glycosphingolipid alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer) which is able to potently activate these type-1 NKT cells. However, non-classical, ‘type-2’, NKT cells lack this TCR repertoire bias, are not reactive to alpha-GalCer and, as a consequence, have been less well characterized [8, 9]. We will focus on the more widely studied type-1 NKT cells, generally termed ‘iNKT cells’ hereafter [10]. Some of the principal features of iNKT cells are depicted in Fig. 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. Principal features and functionality of NKT cells. NKT cells express a semi-invariant TCR that interacts with glycolipid antigens presented by CD1d molecules on APCs. NKT cells also express NK cell markers such as NK1.1 and Ly49 in mice, and NKR-P1 in humans. Upon appropriate TCR ligation, NKT cells rapidly produce a variety of immunomodulatory cytokines and acquire a cytotoxic phenotype (FasL expression). The initial NKT cell response is followed by the secondary activation of other cell types, including NK cells, DC's, conventional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and B cells. APCs become an important source of IL-12, which crucially influences the latter downstream events. In this way, activated NKT cells are capable of directing the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th1 and Th2 cells, and consequently alter ongoing adaptive immune responses.

 
Alpha-GalCer was originally isolated from a marine sponge by the Kirin Brewery Company (Japan) as an agent that inhibits metastatic tumor growth in mice [11, 12]. Alpha-GalCer was later found to be a potent stimulator of both mouse and human iNKT cells, indicating the striking conservation of this immune recognition system [13–18]. Although the discovery of a specific iNKT cell ligand substantially propagated their characterization, their precise physiological relevance remained elusive until, very recently, a number of mammalian and bacterial antigens, structurally related to alpha-GalCer, were reported to stimulate iNKT cells [19–25]. A key property of iNKT cells is their capacity to rapidly produce a variety of cytokines, including Th1 cytokines such as IL-2 and IFN-gamma, and Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10, upon TCR engagement [13, 26–28]. This ability to potently modulate adaptive immunity upon stimulation of a restricted set of antigen-specific receptors, together with their lack of immunological memory, closely resembles the properties of cell types belonging to the innate immune system [29]. As such, our current understanding suggests a straddling function between innate and adaptive immunity both in terms of initiation and modulation of adaptive responses [30]. Therefore, some authors have termed this as bridging immunity.

The relevance of the iNKT cell subset as a therapeutic target in autoimmunity was further demonstrated by several groups studying the response of animal models of autoimmune disease upon therapeutic treatment with alpha-GalCer and its analogues [31, 32]. In general, iNKT cell activation by repeated glycolipid administration conferred protection in a wide range of spontaneous and induced models of autoimmune inflammation, mostly mediated by so called ‘Th2 deviation’ of the immune response. Differences in site, dosage, frequency and timing of glycolipid administration most likely are responsible factors for differential outcomes upon treatment. Here, we will provide an overview of recent results obtained in animal models of arthritic disease and discuss the underlying mechanisms. Based on a better knowledge of iNKT cell biology, specific therapeutic intervention with glycolipids can be designed to suppress synovial inflammation and joint destruction in rheumatic diseases.


    iNKT cells in collagen-induced arthritis: pointing Th cells the direction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is an animal model for RA that is broadly used to address questions of disease pathogenesis and is considered the model of choice in terms of validating therapeutic targets [33]. Arthritis is induced in susceptible mice by immunization with heterologous type-II collagen in adjuvant, leading to a robust T and B cell response to this articular antigen [34, 35]. Susceptibility is strongly associated with MHC types I-Aq and I-Ar, analogous to DR4 and DR1 association with RA. Additionally, the main histopathological features of the resulting joint inflammation closely resemble the pattern observed in RA, including a proliferative synovitis, pannus formation, erosion of cartilage and bone and fibrosis. As outlined subsequently, two different strategies have been employed to study the role of iNKT cells in this model. While one approach entails specific iNKT cell activation by glycolipid administration, other groups use CD1d or iNKT cell knock-out animals to delineate the intrinsic roles of the iNKT cell subset.

CIA is characterized by the dominant activation of a particular T helper (Th) cell subtype expressing pro-inflammatory cytokines (Th1 cells), concordant with clinical and experimental findings in RA patients [35]. A considerable volume of work has been devoted to the modulation of the Th1/Th2 balance towards the Th2 direction, and convincing arguments exist to accept that treatment modalities currently employed in RA exert their immunomodulatory effect at least in part by inhibiting Th1 and/or favouring Th2 differentiation [36] (Fig. 2). In this regard, the outcome of NKT cell stimulation could be considered as rather unproductive, since iNKT cells produce both Th1 and Th2 cytokines upon administration of alpha-GalCer. Therefore, an analogue of alpha-GalCer was designed with a truncated sphingosine tail, OCH, which was reported to preferentially promote Th2-type cytokine secretion (mainly IL-4). OCH showed more potency than alpha-GalCer in preventing autoimmune encephalomyelitis by efficiently shifting the Th1/Th2 balance towards the latter [37]. The same group confirmed therapeutic potential of this compound in CIA, in WT but not in NKT cell deficient animals. In contrast, repeated administration of alpha-GalCer was unable to significantly ameliorate neither clinical course nor histopathology [38]. This finding is somehow surprising, as repeated administration of alpha-GalCer was shown to induce Th2 bias [39–42]. Furthermore, simultaneous in vivo neutralization of IL-4 and, even more pronounced, IL-10 abrogated the ability of OCH to suppress CIA. Based on these findings it is reasonable to assume that OCH exerts its therapeutic activity by an iNKT cell induced shift from a Th1 response in CIA towards protective Th2 immunity. Interestingly, lower levels of TNF and RANKL mRNA were found in iNKT cells upon in vivo treatment with OCH, as compared to alpha-GalCer, suggesting that iNKT cells may have, depending upon their mode of activation, the capacity to modulate major contributors to joint inflammation and destruction.


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2. Proposed mechanism for the deviation of an ongoing Th1 autoimmune response towards protective Th2 immunity by NKT cells in the draining lymph nodes and joints. Repeated administration of alpha-GalCer results in a predominant production of Th2 type cytokines by NKT cells and other cell types. These cytokines directly promote the differentiation of autoantigen-specific CD4+ cells into Th2 cells, and are capable of suppressing pathogenic Th1 cells within the draining lymph nodes or at the site of inflammation. These regulatory Th2 cells in turn might block Th1 function in the lymph nodes or proceed to enter the inflamed synovial tissue and inhibit the activities of Th1 cells in situ. In addition, Th2 cells induce immunoglobulin class switching to subtypes of IgG that do not fix complement, for example IgG1 in mice. Th2 cells are also associated with downregulation of macrophage activation, which are major contributors to the sustainment of the inflammatory process, largely mediated by the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-4.

 
The physiological role of iNKT cells in the development of CIA was further examined in two similar studies by use of iNKT cell-deficient mutant mouse strains. In the first, the interaction of CD1d and iNKT cells was blocked in a semi-therapeutic fashion by use of anti-CD1d mAbs, resulting in suppression of clinical arthritis scores [43]. The partially redundant involvement of a functional iNKT cell subset in CIA development was confirmed by the finding that Jalpha18–/– iNKT cell deficient knock-out mice developed less severe arthritis compared with wild type animals. The Jalpha18–/– mice also showed elevated collagen type-II (CII)-specific IgG1/IgG2a antibody ratios in the serum, which is generally considered representative of the current Th2/Th1 balance [36]. Indeed, IgG1 production is indicative for an ongoing Th2 bias, as Th2 cells orchestrate the immunoglobulin class switching to IgG isotypes that do not fix complement. Moreover, ex vivo restimulation of T cells with collagen type II led to higher production of IL-10, again indicating that skewing of the immune system towards the Th2 direction is associated with protection against CIA. In a second paper, analogous conclusions were drawn from Jalpha18–/– and CD1d–/– mice, as they were both shown to develop milder CIA upon induction as compared to wild type [44]. Remarkably, although CII-specific antibody levels as well as numbers of CD69+-activated T and B cells in the spleen were lowered in the mutant strains, no difference was found upon ex vivo splenic T cell restimulation with CII, neither with regard to proliferative response nor IFN-gamma and IL-4 production. Finally, the likely contribution of a Th2 shift to protection was reproduced, as assessed by altered splenic mRNA ratios of IFN-gamma and IL-4 in Jalpha18–/– mice.

Adding complexity to the situation, Miellot et al. [45] subsequently demonstrated attenuated clinical signs of arthritis upon repeated prophylactic and semi-therapeutic treatment with alpha-GalCer, in contradiction with previous reports, which failed to obtain significant results with alpha-GalCer in CIA. In addition, CII-specific T cell restimulation led to up-regulation of IL-10, but not IL-4 and IFN-gamma. This observation was virtually confirmed by the finding that IL-10R-blockade by use of neutralizing mAb treatment reversed clinical efficacy of alpha-GalCer, but the absence of a control group administered only anti-IL10R makes this finding somewhat difficult to interpret. However, the capability of alpha-GalCer to efficiently attenuate the progression of CIA, at least in part by functional Th2 polarization, was reproduced in our laboratory, as we demonstrated that a single dose administered during the early induction phase was sufficient to modulate clinical course and histopathology (unpublished results).

Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that the intrinsic capacity of iNKT cells to modulate CIA is clearly distinct from their suppressive role upon activation with glycolipid antigen.


    iNKT cells in antibody-induced arthritis: harmful by suppression
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Transfer of serum or immunoglobulins from K/BxN mice, which spontaneously develop progressive, joint-specific autoimmune inflammation, to healthy mice causes an inflammatory arthritis by deposition of auto-antibody in the joint space, inducing an inflammatory cascade by activation of complement and Fcgamma receptor pathways [46–48]. Since inflammation in antibody-induced arthritis (ABIA) occurs in the absence of a primary cellular immune response, this model is considered useful in exploring the terminal effector mechanisms of RA.

Recently, the functionality of iNKT cells in the K/BxN model was elegantly unravelled by Kim et al. [49]. In a first effort, they explored whether susceptibility to ABIA was altered in Jalpha18–/– and CD1d–/– mice upon serum transfer of K/BxN mice, and found that the iNKT cell deficient mice were less prone to joint inflammation. The aforementioned publication by Chiba et al. [43] later also demonstrated disease promoting activity of iNKT cells in K/BxN mice, and in a similar model, which is established by the injection of a mixture of anti-CII mAbs, followed 72 h later by a single administration of LPS. Convincing evidence was provided by Kim et al. for the deteriorating role of iNKT cells during ABIA development, as upon adoptive transfer of sorted iNKT cells in CD1d–/– mice the arthritic disease progression became identical to susceptible wild type mice. Conversely, in vivo stimulation of iNKT cells by administration of alpha-GalCer in B6 mice moderately aggravated joint inflammation. Perhaps the most fascinating data, however, described the actual appearance of iNKT cells in the synovium upon ABIA induction, a site were they are usually absent, and the consequent induction of significant alterations in cytokine balance within the joint. Most notably, local mRNA levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1) were markedly increased in CD1d–/– mice, whereas transcription of IFN-gamma and IL-4 was decreased. This modulation was determined to be joint-specific and iNKT cell-dependent, since no differences were found in the spleen and induced changes could be partially restored upon adoptive transfer of sorted iNKT cells. The crucial involvement of TGFbeta1 in mediating the protective effect was evidenced by in vivo administration of neutralizing anti-TGFbeta1 mAb and recombinant TGFbeta1, which abrogated amelioration of ABIA in CD1d–/– mice and conferred protection in wild-type mice, respectively. Finally, adoptive transfer experiments of IL4–/– and IFNgamma–/– iNKT cells demonstrated that iNKT cell-mediated secretion of IL-4 and IFN-gamma is causative and indispensable for suppression of TGFbeta1 production in the joint. The detailed mechanisms behind this type of TGFbeta suppression remain to be unravelled.

Very recently, the same group provided exciting novel insight into a previously unrecognized mode of iNKT cell stimulation [50]. Kim and co-workers found that FcgammaRIII (CD16) engagement, mediated by IgG immune complexes in joint tissues during ABIA, was capable of directly activating iNKT cells in the absence of simultaneous TCR stimulation. FcgammaRIII is expressed by neutrophils, NK cells, macrophages and NKT cells and specifically recognizes the Fc portion of immunoglobulins, thereby mediating phagocytosis and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Kim et al. showed that FcgammaRIII engagement by aggregated IgG specifically activates iNKT cells and not T cells or NK cells, as examined by upregulation of CD25/CD69 surface expression. Although lower levels of cytokine production by sorted iNKT cells were measured upon aggregated IgG treatment as compared to anti-CD3 TCR ligation, levels of IL-4, IFN-gamma, IL-10 and IL-13 were considerably decreased upon ex vivo aggregated IgG treatment in iNKT cells derived from FcgammaR–/– mice compared to wild type. Finally, in vivo restoration of full-blown ABIA in CD1d–/– mice was not obtained by adoptive transfer of FcgammaR–/– iNKT cells, concordant with the unaltered production of IL-4, IFN-gamma and TGFbeta1. The ability of FcgammaR–/– iNKT cells to infiltrate joint tissues and to respond adequately to TCR stimulation by alpha-GalCer was, however, intact, indicating that the failure to induce joint inflammation in CD1d–/– mice was not due to a downstream functional defect of the transferred iNKT cells, but rather to the inability to stimulate these cells via the FcgammaR. Together, these results shed light on the localized involvement of iNKT cells in the joint space during ABIA development, and point out a crucial role for an activating Fc receptor on iNKT cells (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3. Model for the promotion of ABIA by NKT cells. Upon engagement of Fc{gamma}RIII (CD16) by IgG in the joint, NKT cells are activated independent of TCR ligation. They subsequently produce high local levels of IL-4 and IFN-{gamma}, which in turn downmodulate local production of TGFß1. Several studies have highlighted important immunoregulatory properties for TGFß1, such as the suppression of pathogenic Th1 cells. Thus, decreased levels of TGFß1 will lead to enhancement of inflammatory processes.

 

    iNKT cells: from bench to bedside
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Accumulating data support the involvement of iNKT cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases in human patients. Some notable differences must be taken into account, however, when aiming to delineate parallels between results derived from animal models versus human subjects, in terms of iNKT cell biology. Significantly, humans have lower numbers of iNKT cells than mice and iNKT cell subsets from these phylogenetically different species most likely have distinct functional properties as well [29, 51]. In humans, for instance, functionally distinct iNKT cell subsets were described based on the differential expression of CD4: whereas CD4+ iNKT cells produced both Th1 and Th2 cytokines, CD4 iNKT cells were predominantly biased towards Th1 cytokine production [52, 53]. Analogously, these different iNKT cell phenotypes have been observed in mice, and some evidence exists supporting a differential functionality in vitro and in vivo [8, 9, 54, 55]. Nevertheless, it remains to be elucidated as to what extent these corresponding iNKT cell phenotypes share the same physiological functions between species. This possible limitation is further exemplified by the finding that mouse iNKT cells generally do not express the CD8 molecule, whereas up to 50% of human iNKT cells express CD8alpha-alpha, although only a small portion expresses CD8alpha-beta, and regulatory functions were ascribed to this human CD8+iNKT cell subset [5, 18, 53, 56, 57]. In addition, the consensus that experimental models do not always closely mimic the human disease under study, represents another obstacle for reliably predicting the outcome of iNKT cell activation in human autoimmune conditions [58].

There are several arguments favouring a role for iNKT cells in human rheumatic diseases as a consistent reduction of both the aforementioned CD4+ and CD4 iNKT subsets in peripheral blood from RA, SLE, SSc and sjögren syndrome patients have been reported [59]. Interestingly, the CD4 iNKT cell fraction was also found to be decreased locally in rheumatoid synovium. Moreover, Kojo and co-workers defined two categories of patients according to their alpha-GalCer responsiveness. Co-culture experiments of sorted iNKT cells from healthy controls together with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) from non-responders or healthy controls, respectively, subsequently suggested that the non-responsiveness is not due to aberrant functionality of alpha-GalCer presenting APCs, but rather to an abnormality in the CD4 iNKT cell subset. Another study by Linsen et al. confirmed the decreased frequency of iNKT cells in the blood of RA patients, the existence of alpha-GalCer responsive and unresponsive iNKT subsets, and additionally reports on their Th1-like phenotype in the blood but not in the synovial fluid [60].

Taken together, these studies provide attractive indications for a possible role of iNKT cells in human arthritic disease, encouraging further investigation of iNKT cell activation as a therapeutic strategy.


    Lessions from animal models: context matters
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The interpretation of data obtained in animal models inherently requires an integrated approach. While these models allow us to examine mechanistic hypotheses, which cannot be elucidated by use of human samples, they often yield conflicting results. Nevertheless, most contradictions can be explained by the different underlying etiology and pathology of the various models, differences in treatment protocols, mouse strains, nature of the therapeutic compound, etc.

ABIA, as induced in the K/BxN serum transfer model does not include an initial adaptive immune response as observed in CIA, and therefore only represents the final effector phase of established RA [48]. Kim et al. already proposed that iNKT cells have a dual functionality depending on the ongoing autoimmune process, being suppressive in the inductive phase, and becoming provocative during progression of the disease [49]. Likewise, our data support this kinetic, biphasic functionality in CIA (unpublished results), as do results from alpha-GalCer treatment in EAE and SLE models [32, 61]. Thus, variation in treatment protocol may be, at least in part, the underlying cause of the profound differences in clinical outcome upon alpha-GalCer treatment in CIA and between results obtained in CIA and ABIA models.

Given the apparent downmodulation of iNKT cell numbers in RA, it seems conceivable that glycolipid administration might be beneficial in autoimmunity by contributing to the restoration of iNKT cell numbers, as revealed in two phase I studies conducted in advanced cancer patients [62, 63]. However, results in CIA now clearly highlight the crucial importance of the type of glycolipid antigen with respect to the iNKT cell response, induced cytokine profile, and downstream cellular interactions in the eventual clinical outcome. Structurally modified forms of alpha-GalCer, such as OCH and alpha-C-GalCer, stimulate qualitatively altered responses from iNKT cells [37, 64]. Systematic alteration of the length and extent of unsaturation of the N-acyl substituents changes the outcome of iNKT cell activation, in some cases leading to an anti-inflammatory Th2 cytokine bias [65]. The molecular mechanism of preferential Th2 cytokine production upon iNKT cell stimulation has been elegantly studied for OCH [66]. In conclusion, a better understanding of the relationship between structure and functionality of iNKT stimulating glycolipids will be important in order to design analogues with superior immunotherapeutic properties, ultimately leading to tailored therapeutic manipulation of iNKT cells in RA.

Significant interference with results in CIA can also be expected from differences in genetic background between mouse strains. Highly susceptible male DBA/1 mice were used by Miellot et al. [45] and the induction of CIA was achieved by a standard immunization protocol. The other studies mentioned all utilize B6 mice, which are normally less predisposed to arthritis development, and which require modified immunization conditions. These deviations may be held accountable for some of the observed variation in results. The actual presence of iNKT cells within the joint has been demonstrated in both mice and humans, and some evidence has been gained suggesting distinct functional characteristics of this local population as compared to iNKT cells from peripheral blood [49, 60]. Furthermore, an organ-dependent diversity of the resident iNKT cell subpopulations has been clearly shown in mice and humans, both in terms of frequency and functionality [8, 67]. An attractive hypothesis is that local, i.e. intra-articular, glycolipid treatment could modulate severity of arthritis.

Finally, the variety of iNKT cell responses induced upon glycolipid treatment goes far beyond the concept of prototypic Th2 bias. Complex mechanisms, including cellular interplay with dendritic cells, NKT cells and conventional T cells, have been found to orchestrate the resulting immune response after iNKT cell activation [4]. Of interest, a subset of IL-17-producing T cells, called Th17 cells, was recently described as a novel effector CD4 T cell arm [68, 69], and IL-17 was repeatedly shown to be of critical importance in experimental autoimmune arthritis [70–74] and RA [75, 76]. It has been suggested that iNKT cells promptly produce IL-17 upon activation, which may account for yet another pathway by which iNKT cells influence ongoing inflammatory processes [77]. Depending on the type of antigen, duration of stimulation and various other parameters, iNKT cells can confer to processes such as anergy and tolerization or, conversely, display adjuvant properties [78–81]. Indeed, a single injection of alpha-GalCer was shown to induce long-term NKT cell hyporesponsiveness in mice, reminiscent of the anergic state that is induced in conventional T cells by strong stimuli such as superantigens [79]. This observation raises the issue of the avoidance of anergy induction in the design of treatment regimens that use alpha-GalCer as a specific activator of iNKT cells. Given this broad range of potential mechanisms, it is therefore reasonable to assume that future work, propagated by the development of novel glycolipids, will reveal yet other modes of action of iNKT cells in arthritic disease, different from Th2 immune deviation.


    Concluding remarks
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The involvement of iNKT cells in RA has now been sufficiently documented to support further investigation of the application of alpha-GalCer and its analogues in human disease. Some obstacles, however, should be taken into account when translating preclinical studies to the clinic. Indeed, immunological properties of human iNKT cells as compared to mouse iNKT cells, and in particular how they may differentially respond to glycolipid activation, should be examined in depth. A better understanding of the structural basis for the induction of alternate iNKT cells responses upon stimulation with different glycolipid analogues will enhance future tailored design of iNKT cell antigens. In addition, novel methods of administration, such as repeated systemic and local glycolipid injection, may be appropriate in order to optimize clinical outcome of iNKT cell activation. Nevertheless, several concerns regarding the safety of therapeutic iNKT cell stimulation in humans remain to be tackled. Although short-term treatment of human subjects with alpha-GalCer appeared to be safe, the induction of allergic airway inflammation, liver toxicity and abortions in mice, demand cautiousness when aiming to implicate this glycolipid in future therapies [82]. On the other hand, appropriate glycolipid design may overcome this hurdle, possibly by the presence of lower iNKT cell numbers in humans, which may evoke less pronounced side effects. Altogether, the exploitation of the iNKT cell subset as a flexible, yet powerful system holds great promise for therapeutic purposes in RA.

Formula


    Acknowledgement
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
This study was supported by a concerted action grant GOA2001/12051501 of Ghent University, Belgium and by grants of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) and the Research Council of Ghent University.

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction: NKT cells and...
 iNKT cells in collagen-induced...
 iNKT cells in antibody-induced...
 iNKT cells: from bench...
 Lessions from animal models:...
 Concluding remarks
 Acknowledgement
 References
 

  1. Van Kaer L. (2004) Natural killer T cells as targets for immunotherapy of autoimmune diseases. Immunol Cell Biol 82:315–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Janeway CA, Travers P, Walport M, Schlomchik M. (2001) Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. 5th edn (Garland Science Publishing, London, NY).
  3. Godfrey DI, Hammond KJ, Poulton LD, Smyth MJ, Baxter AG. (2000) NKT cells: facts, functions and fallacies. Immunol Today 21:573–83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Kronenberg M. (2005) Toward an understanding of NKT cell biology: progress and paradoxes. Annu Rev Immunol 23:877–900.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Lantz O and Bendelac A. (1994) An invariant T cell receptor alpha chain is used by a unique subset of major histocompatibility complex class I-specific CD4+ and CD4-8- T cells in mice and humans. J Exp Med 180:1097–106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Porcelli S, Yockey CE, Brenner MB, Balk SP. (1993) Analysis of T cell antigen receptor (TCR) expression by human peripheral blood CD4-8- alpha/beta T cells demonstrates preferential use of several Vbeta genes and an invariant TCR alpha chain. J Exp Med 178:1–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dellabona P, Padovan E, Casorati G, Brockhaus M, Lanzavecchia A. (1994) An invariant V alpha 24-J alpha Q/V beta 11 T cell receptor is expressed in all individuals by clonally expanded CD4-8- T cells. J Exp Med 180:1171–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Eberl G, Lees R, Smiley ST, et al. (1999) Tissue-specific segregation of CD1d-dependent and CD1d-independent NK T cells. J Immunol 162:6410–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hammond KJ, Pelikan SB, Crowe NY, et al. (1999) NKT cells are phenotypically and functionally diverse. Eur J Immunol 29:3768–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Godfrey DI, MacDonald HR, Kronenberg M, Smyth MJ, Van Kaer L. (2004) NKT cells: what's in a name? Nat Rev Immunol 4:231–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Natori T, Koezuka Y, Higa T. (1993) Agelasphins, novel alpha-galactosylsceramides from the marine sponge Agelas Mauritianus. Tetrahedron Lett 34:5591–2.
  12. Morita M, Motoki K, Akimoto K, et al. (1995) Structure-activity relationship of alpha-galactosylceramides against B16-bearing mice. J Med Chem 38:2176–87.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Kawano T, Cui J, Koezuka Y, et al. (1997) CD1d-restricted and TCR-mediated activation of valpha14 NKT cells by glycosylceramides. Science 278:1626–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Exley M, Garcia J, Balk SP, Porcelli S. (1997) Requirements for CD1d recognition by human invariant Valpha24 + CD4-CD8- T cells. J Exp Med 186:109–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Davodeau F, Peyrat MA, Necker A, et al. (1997) Close phenotypic and functional similarities between human and murine alphabeta T cells expressing invariant TCR alpha-chains. J Immunol 158:5603–11.[Abstract]
  16. Brossay L, Naidenko O, Burdin N, et al. (1998) Structural requirements for galactosylceramide recognition by CD1-restricted NK T cells. J Immunol 161:5124–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brossay L, Chioda M, Burdin N, et al. (1998) CD1d-mediated recognition of an alpha-galactosylceramide by natural killer T cells is highly conserved through mammalian evolution. J Exp Med 188:1521–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Takahashi T, Nieda M, Koezuka Y, et al. (2000) Analysis of human V alpha 24 + CD4 + NKT cells activated by alpha-glycosylceramide-pulsed monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 164:4458–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Joyce S, Woods AS, Yewdell JW, et al. (1998) Natural ligand of mouse CD1d1: cellular glycosylphosphatidylinositol. Science 279:1541–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zhou D, Mattner J, Cantu C 3rd, et al. (2004) Lysosomal glycosphingolipid recognition by NKT cells. Science 306:1786–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Fischer K, Scotet E, Niemeyer M, et al. (2004) Mycobacterial phosphatidylinositol mannoside is a natural antigen for CD1d-restricted T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:10685–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wu D, Xing GW, Poles MA, et al. (2005) Bacterial glycolipids and analogs as antigens for CD1d-restricted NKT cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:1351–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mattner J, Debord KL, Ismail N, et al. (2005) Exogenous and endogenous glycolipid antigens activate NKT cells during microbial infections. Nature 434:525–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Kinjo Y, Wu D, Kim G, et al. (2005) Recognition of bacterial glycosphingolipids by natural killer T cells. Nature 434:520–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kinjo Y, Tupin E, Wu D, et al. (2006) Natural killer T cells recognize diacylglycerol antigens from pathogenic bacteria. Nat Immunol 7:978–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Bendelac A, Lantz O, Quimby ME, et al. (1995) CD1 recognition by mouse NK1 + T lymphocytes. Science 268:863–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Spada FM, Koezuka Y, Porcelli SA. (1998) CD1d-restricted recognition of synthetic glycolipid antigens by human natural killer T cells. J Exp Med 188:1529–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Burdin N, Brossay L, Koezuka Y, et al. (1998) Selective ability of mouse CD1 to present glycolipids: alpha-galactosylceramide specifically stimulates V alpha 14 + NK T lymphocytes. J Immunol 161:3271–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Taniguchi M, Harada M, Kojo S, Nakayama T, Wakao H. (2003) The regulatory role of Valpha14 NKT cells in innate and acquired immune response. Annu Rev Immunol 21:483–513.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Van Kaer L and Joyce S. (2005) Innate immunity: NKT cells in the spotlight. Curr Biol 15:R429–31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Wilson MT, Singh AK, Van Kaer L. (2002) Immunotherapy with ligands of natural killer T cells. Trends Mol Med 8:225–31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Van Kaer L. (2005) alpha-Galactosylceramide therapy for autoimmune diseases: prospects and obstacles. Nat Rev Immunol 5:31–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Williams RO. (2004) Collagen-induced arthritis as a model for rheumatoid arthritis. Methods Mol Med 98:207–16.[Medline]
  34. Courtenay JS, Dallman MJ, Dayan AD, Martin A, Mosedale B. (1980) Immunisation against heterologous type II collagen induces arthritis in mice. Nature 283:666–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Luross JA and Williams NA. (2001) The genetic and immunopathological processes underlying collagen-induced arthritis. Immunology 103:407–16.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Schulze-Koops H and Kalden JR. (2001) The balance of Th1/Th2 cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 15:677–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Miyamoto K, Miyake S, Yamamura T. (2001) A synthetic glycolipid prevents autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inducing TH2 bias of natural killer T cells. Nature 413:531–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Chiba A, Oki S, Miyamoto K, et al. (2004) Suppression of collagen-induced arthritis by natural killer T cell activation with OCH, a sphingosine-truncated analog of alpha-galactosylceramide. Arthritis Rheum 50:305–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Burdin N, Brossay L, Kronenberg M. (1999) Immunization with alpha-galactosylceramide polarizes CD1-reactive NK T cells towards Th2 cytokine synthesis. Eur J Immunol 29:2014–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Singh N, Hong S, Scherer DC, et al. (1999) Cutting edge: activation of NK T cells by CD1d and alpha-galactosylceramide directs conventional T cells to the acquisition of a Th2 phenotype. J Immunol 163:2373–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Singh AK, Wilson MT, Hong S, et al. (2001) Natural killer T cell activation protects mice against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 194:1801–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hong S, Wilson MT, Serizawa I, et al. (2001) The natural killer T-cell ligand alpha-galactosylceramide prevents autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Nat Med 7:1052–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Chiba A, Kaieda S, Oki S, Yamamura T, Miyake S. (2005) The involvement of V(alpha)14 natural killer T cells in the pathogenesis of arthritis in murine models. Arthritis Rheum 52:1941–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Ohnishi Y, Tsutsumi A, Goto D, et al. (2005) TCR Valpha14 natural killer T cells function as effector T cells in mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol 141:47–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Miellot A, Zhu R, Diem S, et al. (2005) Activation of invariant NK T cells protects against experimental rheumatoid arthritis by an IL-10-dependent pathway. Eur J Immunol 35:3704–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Kouskoff V, Korganow V, Duchatelle C, et al. (1996) Organ-specific disease provoked by systemic autoimmunity. Cell 87:811–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Matsumoto I, Staub A, Benoist C, Mathis D. (1999) Arthritis provoked by linked T and B cell recognition of a glycolytic enzyme. Science 286:1732–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ji H, Gauguier D, Ohmura K, et al. (2001) Genetic influences on the end-stage effector phase of arthritis. J Exp Med 194:321–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Kim HY, Kim HJ, Min HS, et al. (2005) NKT cells promote antibody-induced joint inflammation by suppressing transforming growth factor beta1 production. J Exp Med 201:41–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Kim HY, Kim S, Chung DH. (2006) FcgammaRIII engagement provides activating signals to NKT cells in antibody-induced joint inflammation. J Clin Invest 116:2484–92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Kronenberg M and Gapin L. (2002) The unconventional lifestyle of NKT cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2:557–68.[Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Lee PT, Benlagha K, Teyton L, Bendelac A. (2002) Distinct functional lineages of human V(alpha)24 natural killer T cells. J Exp Med 195:637–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Gumperz JE, Miyake S, Yamamura T, Brenner MB. (2002) Functionally distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cells revealed by CD1d tetramer staining. J Exp Med 195:625–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Terabe M, Matsui S, Noben-Trauth N, et al. (2000) NKT cell-mediated repression of tumor immunosurveillance by IL-13 and the IL-4R-STAT6 pathway. Nat Immunol 1:515–20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  55. Hammond KJ, Pellicci DG, Poulton LD, et al. (2001) CD1d-restricted NKT cells: an interstrain comparison. J Immunol 167:1164–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Gadola SD, Dulphy N, Salio M, Cerundolo V. (2002) Valpha24-JalphaQ-independent, CD1d-restricted recognition of alpha-galactosylceramide by human CD4(+) and CD8alphabeta(+) T lymphocytes. J Immunol 168:5514–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Ho LP, Urban BC, Jones L, Ogg GS, McMichael AJ. (2004) CD4(-)CD8alphaalpha subset of CD1d-restricted NKT cells controls T cell expansion. J Immunol 172:7350–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Wooley PH. (2004) The usefulness and the limitations of animal models in identifying targets for therapy in arthritis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 18:47–58.
  59. Kojo S, Adachi Y, Keino H, Taniguchi M, Sumida T. (2001) Dysfunction of T cell receptor AV24AJ18+, BV11 + double-negative regulatory natural killer T cells in autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Rheum 44:1127–38.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  60. Linsen L, Thewissen M, Baeten K, et al. (2005) Peripheral blood but not synovial fluid natural killer T cells are biased towards a Th1-like phenotype in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 7:R493–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  61. Zeng D, Liu Y, Sidobre S, Kronenberg M, Strober S. (2003) Activation of natural killer T cells in NZB/W mice induces Th1-type immune responses exacerbating lupus. J Clin Invest 112:1211–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  62. Ishikawa A, Motohashi S, Ishikawa E, et al. (2005) A phase I study of alpha-galactosylceramide (KRN7000)-pulsed dendritic cells in patients with advanced and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:1910–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Motohashi S, Ishikawa A, Ishikawa E, et al. (2006) A Phase I Study of In vitro Expanded Natural Killer T Cells in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res.
  64. Schmieg J, Yang G, Franck RW, Tsuji M. (2003) Superior protection against malaria and melanoma metastases by a C-glycoside analogue of the natural killer T cell ligand alpha-Galactosylceramide. J Exp Med 198:1631–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Yu KO, Im JS, Molano A, et al. (2005) Modulation of CD1d-restricted NKT cell responses by using N-acyl variants of alpha-galactosylceramides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3383–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Oki S, Chiba A, Yamamura T, Miyake S. (2004) The clinical implication and molecular mechanism of preferential IL-4 production by modified glycolipid-stimulated NKT cells. J Clin Invest 113:1631–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  67. Kim CH, Butcher EC, Johnston B. (2002) Distinct subsets of human Valpha24-invariant NKT cells: cytokine responses and chemokine receptor expression. Trends Immunol 23:516–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  68. Harrington LE, Hatton RD, Mangan PR, et al. (2005) Interleukin 17-producing CD4 + effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages. Nat Immunol 6:1123–32.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  69. Park H, Li Z, Yang XO, et al. (2005) A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat Immunol 6:1133–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  70. Koenders MI, Lubberts E, Oppers-Walgreen B, et al. (2005) Blocking of interleukin-17 during reactivation of experimental arthritis prevents joint inflammation and bone erosion by decreasing RANKL and interleukin-1. Am J Pathol 167:141–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Koenders MI, Lubberts E, Oppers-Walgreen B, et al. (2005) Induction of cartilage damage by overexpression of T cell interleukin-17A in experimental arthritis in mice deficient in interleukin-1. Arthritis Rheum 52:975–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Lubberts E, Koenders MI, Oppers-Walgreen B, et al. (2004) Treatment with a neutralizing anti-murine interleukin-17 antibody after the onset of collagen-induced arthritis reduces joint inflammation, cartilage destruction, and bone erosion. Arthritis Rheum 50:650–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  73. Lubberts E, Joosten LA, Oppers B, et al. (2001) IL-1-independent role of IL-17 in synovial inflammation and joint destruction during collagen-induced arthritis. J Immunol 167:1004–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Nakae S, Nambu A, Sudo K, Iwakura Y. (2003) Suppression of immune induction of collagen-induced arthritis in IL-17-deficient mice. J Immunol 171:6173–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Kotake S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, et al. (1999) IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis. J Clin Invest 103:1345–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
  76. Sato K, Suematsu A, Okamoto K, et al. (2006) Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J Exp Med 203:2673–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Yoshiga Y, Goto D, Mamura M, Matsumoto I, Ito S, Tsutsumi A, Sumida T. (2006) NKT cells derived IL-17 participates in the pathogenesis of collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 34:S172.
  78. Fujii S, Shimizu K, Smith C, Bonifaz L, Steinman RM. (2003) Activation of natural killer T cells by alpha-galactosylceramide rapidly induces the full maturation of dendritic cells in vivo and thereby acts as an adjuvant for combined CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity to a coadministered protein. J Exp Med 198:267–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Ko SY, Ko HJ, Chang WS, et al. (2005) alpha-Galactosylceramide can act as a nasal vaccine adjuvant inducing protective immune responses against viral infection and tumor. J Immunol 175:3309–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Parekh VV, Wilson MT, Olivares-Villagomez D, et al. (2005) Glycolipid antigen induces long-term natural killer T cell anergy in mice. J Clin Invest 115:2572–83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  81. Margalit M and Ilan Y. (2005) Induction of immune tolerance: a role for Natural killer T lymphocytes? Liver Int 25:501–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  82. Mars LT, Novak J, Liblau RS, Lehuen A. (2004) Therapeutic manipulation of iNKT cells in autoimmunity: modes of action and potential risks. Trends Immunol 25:471–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Submitted 4 November 2006; revised version accepted 8 December 2006.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/4/565    most recent
kel437v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coppieters, K.
Right arrow Articles by Elewaut, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coppieters, K.
Right arrow Articles by Elewaut, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Experimental Arthritis
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?