Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(5):584-590; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kem298
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
Rheumatology First Quarter 2008 Quiz
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/5/584    most recent
kem298v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foxwell, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foxwell, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


REVIEWS

Signalling, inflammation and arthritis

NF-{kappa}B and its relevance to arthritis and inflammation

R. E. Simmonds and B. M. Foxwell

Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London.

Correspondence to: B. M. Foxwell, Cytokine and Signal Transduction Laboratory, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 1 Aspenlea Road, London W6 8LH, UK. E-mail: b.foxwell{at}imperial.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In the synovial cells of patients with RA, activation of the nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) pathway results in the transactivation of a multitude of responsive genes that contribute to the inflammatory phenotype, including TNF-{alpha} from macrophages, matrix metalloproteinases from synovial fibroblasts and chemokines that recruit immune cells to the inflamed pannus. This is largely a consequence of activation of the ‘canonical’ NF-{kappa}B pathway that involves heterodimers of p50/p65. Whilst much information on the role of NF-{kappa}B in inflammation has been gleaned from genetic deficiency of the respective genes in mice, important differences exist in the signalling networks between human and murine immune cells and immortalized cell lines. Despite these differences at the molecular level, the importance of NF-{kappa}B in inflammation is undisputed and inhibition of the pathway is widely believed to have great potential as a therapeutic target in RA. Commercial effort has gone into developing inhibitors of NF-{kappa}B activation. However, inhibition of the NF-{kappa}B activation can result in an exacerbation of inflammation if TNF-{alpha} production by macrophages is not controlled. It will be important that such inhibitors are carefully monitored before their long-term use in chronic inflammatory conditions such as RA.

KEY WORDS: NF-{kappa}B, Signalling pathways, Review


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) family of transcription factors are amongst the most intensively studied in vertebrate biology. Since their discovery in the 1980s, they have been shown to be involved in many different pathways, including inflammation and also cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. As will be described in detail in this review, activation of the NF-{kappa}Bs is normally pro-inflammatory. However, they are also anti-apoptotic (pro-survival) and a delicate balance between the two functions must be tightly regulated [1, 2]. The importance of the NF-{kappa}Bs in human physiology is emphasized by the common instances of disease where their activity is dysregulated.

The NF-{kappa}B family consists of five members (Table 1); p105 (constitutively processed to p50), p100 (processed to p52 under tightly regulated conditions), p65 (also known as rela), RelB and c-Rel. These NF-{kappa}B subunits form homodimers and heterodimers to produce NF-{kappa}B transcription factors. They bind to the NF-{kappa}B consensus sequence (5'-GGGRNYYYCC-3') and then activate (or, in some cases, repress) target gene transcription [3, 4]. The most common activating form (also present in activated macrophages [5, 6]) is a heterodimer of p50 and p65. In unstimulated cells, NF-{kappa}B transcription factors are found in the cytosol, rendered inactive by an inhibitor of {kappa}B (I{kappa}B) molecule. Activation of the I{kappa}B kinase (IKK) complex targets I{kappa}B for degradation, thus releasing NF-{kappa}B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. The NF-{kappa}B transcription factors

 
In recent years, there has been an explosion of publications describing the complexities of the pathways of NF-{kappa}B activation in response to different cellular stimuli, in different disease states and in different cell types. Despite this, there is still much to learn and new observations and discoveries in this field are a regular event. This review will attempt to bring the reader up to date with models of NF-{kappa}B activation that are relevant to inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). But first, let us examine the evidence that supports a role for NF-{kappa}B in the pathogenesis of RA.


    NF-{kappa}B is activated in RA
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The joints of patients with RA are characterized by an infiltration of immune cells into the synovium, leading to chronic inflammation, pannus formation and subsequent irreversible joint and cartilage damage [7]. The RA synovium is known to comprise largely of macrophages (30–40%), T cells (~30%) and synovial fibroblasts, but also of B cells, dendritic cells, other immune cells and synovial cells such as endothelium [7, 8]. RA synovial fluid has been shown to contain a wide range of effector molecules including pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-{alpha} and IL-18), chemokines (such as IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1 and RANTES), MMPs (such as MMP-1, -3, -9 and -13) and metabolic proteins (such as Cox-1, Cox-2 and iNOS). These interact with one another in a complex manner that is thought to cause a vicious cycle of pro-inflammatory signals resulting in chronic and persistent inflammation [7] (Fig. 1). TNF-{alpha}, in particular, is the prime inflammatory mediator and also induces apoptosis. Importantly, the genes encoding TNF-{alpha} and many of the other factors mentioned above are now known to be under the control of NF-{kappa}B transcription factors [4], suggesting that NF-{kappa}B could be one of the master regulators of inflammatory cytokine production in RA. Indeed, the presence of activated NF-{kappa}B transcription factors has been demonstrated in cultured synovial fibroblasts [9–11], human arthritic joints [11–17] and the joints of animals with experimentally induced RA [18, 19]. Immunohistochemistry has established the presence of both p50 and p65 in the nuclei of cells lining the synovial membrane and macrophages [16–18]. Furthermore, nuclear extracts of cells have been shown to bind to the NF-{kappa}B consensus sequence [10, 16]. New techniques such as in vivo imaging have also been used to demonstrate the activity of NF-{kappa}B in a mouse model that mimicked RA-like chronic inflammation. By placing the luciferase gene under the control of NF-{kappa}B, increased luminescence was observed in the joints of live mice [12].


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. The role of NF-{kappa}B in RA. NF-{kappa}B is known to be activated in the pathogenesis of RA, and is central to the chronic cycle of inflammation that underlies its pathology. The triggering molecule that starts this process is unknown, but could include molecules on the surface of T cells (T-cell receptors, TCRs), endogenous or exogenous ligands for the toll-like receptor family (TLR ligands), or other unknown molecules (question mark, represented at the top of the figure). These activate resident macrophages in the synovium, leading to phosphorylation of the I{kappa}B by the IKK complex that targets it for degradation by the proteasome. This releases NF-{kappa}B dimers such as p50/p65 that induce the expression of many pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and leads to inflammation and an infiltration of large numbers of immune cells into the synovium. The inflammatory mediators, particularly TNF-{alpha}, activate cells in the synovium in an autocrine (macrophages, M{varphi}) and paracrine (fibroblast-like synoviocytes, FLS) manner, and this is also largely NF-{kappa}B dependent. FLSs synthesize many NF-{kappa}B-induced genes in response to TNF-{alpha} or IL-1, including chemokines that lead to further inflammatory infiltrates and MMPs that promote joint destruction.

 
These findings are supported by a study that investigated experimentally induced arthritis in mice that carried knockouts of the genes for the NF-{kappa}B family members p50 or c-Rel. The two experimental models used were CIA (a model of chronic RA where disease development involves both T and B cells) and an acute/destructive model induced by methylated BSA and IL-1 (involving exclusively T cells and not B cells). Lack of c-Rel had no influence on the acute model and, whilst reducing the incidence of CIA, did not prevent a severe immunohistopathology in affected joints. In addition, c-Rel could not be found in the nuclei of cells explanted from the arthritic joints of wild-type mice, suggesting that this subunit of NF-{kappa}B is of limited importance in RA [20]. In contrast, lack of p50 caused a complete loss of a humoral response, severely impeded T-cell proliferation and conferred resistance to both forms of arthritis [20]. This clearly demonstrates a central role for p50 (presumably p50/p65 heterodimers) in the inflammation that underlies RA.


    Core principles of the ‘canonical’ NF-{kappa}B pathway
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The molecular events that lead to activation of NF-{kappa}B transcription factors in the RA synovium are clearly of great interest and involve the so-called ‘classical’ or ‘canonical’ pathway. The three main players in the pathway, the IKK complex, I{kappa}Bs and the NF-{kappa}B transcription factors, will be discussed in turn.

The IKK complex
The high-molecular weight IKK complex plays an extremely important role in the activation of NF-{kappa}B, since it represents a convergence point for the signals that are transmitted from many different cellular stimuli, such as the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IL-1. The function of the IKK complex in the canonical pathway is to phosphorylate I{kappa}B{alpha} and I{kappa}Bβ and target them for degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. The canonical IKK complex consists of at least three subunits: IKK1 (also known as IKK{alpha}), IKK2 (also known as IKKβ) and NF-{kappa}B essential modulator (NEMO, also known as IKK{gamma}). Additional, as yet unidentified, subunits are likely to be discovered. Both IKK1 and IKK2 have catalytic activity and IKK2 is generally considered to be the most relevant to RA, since it is indispensable for phosphorylation of I{kappa}B{alpha} by the IKK complex [4]. The role of IKK1 is less clear, but recent evidence points towards a negative regulatory role, acting as a ‘checkpoint’ in NF-{kappa}B activation to prevent uncontrolled stimulation of cells [5, 21]. NEMO does not have kinase activity but is necessary for phosphorylation of I{kappa}B{alpha}/I{kappa}Bβ by the IKK complex [22, 23].

I{kappa}B{alpha}, I{kappa}Bβ and I{kappa}B{varepsilon}
I{kappa}B{alpha} is the prototypical member of the seven-member I{kappa}B family (Table 2) and was identified by its ability to render the common NF-{kappa}B p65/p50 dimer inactive in the cytosol of unstimulated cells. Both I{kappa}B{alpha} and I{kappa}Bβ bind to NF-{kappa}B and mask the nuclear localization sequence on the p50/p65 heterodimer thus inhibiting its entry into the nucleus. Following I{kappa}B{alpha} phosphorylation by the IKK complex and degradation, the nuclear localization signal is no longer masked and this causes translocation of the active dimer to the nucleus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. The I{kappa}B family

 
One of the unique features of the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway is its rapid yet transient activation, which prevents a persistent response that could result in pathological changes in affected cells. Down-regulation of NF-{kappa}B activity coincides with the reappearance of I{kappa}B{alpha}, which requires new protein synthesis. Indeed, the I{kappa}B{alpha} gene promoter contains 11 NF-{kappa}B consensus sequences making it extremely responsive to NF-{kappa}B activation. Newly synthesized I{kappa}B{alpha} enters the nucleus, binds NF-{kappa}B dimers and returns them to the cytosol, thus dampening the response. If the stimulus is still present, these are again degraded and NF-{kappa}B activity rises again. Following LPS exposure, this results in a phenomenon known as ‘rapid oscillatory activation’ where the response gradually becomes dampened over time [24]. The NF-{kappa}B response is also negatively regulated by I{kappa}B{varepsilon}, which is a target of NF-{kappa}B and is synthesized in anti-phase compared to I{kappa}B{alpha} [25]. In contrast to I{kappa}B{alpha} and I{kappa}B{varepsilon}, I{kappa}Bβ is not a genetic target of NF-{kappa}B and it is not rapidly resynthesized following NF-{kappa}B activation. Therefore, situations in which I{kappa}Bβ predominates have the potential to result in prolonged NF-{kappa}B activation [4]. However, the relevance of both I{kappa}Bβ and I{kappa}B{varepsilon} to RA is unclear, since I{kappa}B{alpha} is so dominant in the inactivation of NF-{kappa}B.

The NF-{kappa}B family of transcription factors
A crucial aspect of the NF-{kappa}B response is the make-up of the dimers that are bound to and inhibited by the I{kappa}Bs. There is considerable variation in the combinations that have been observed [3]. The subunits that are present in the dimers influence their biological activity because the subunits have different functional domains. As mentioned above, all five members of the NF-{kappa}B transcription factor family (Table 1) contain a Rel-homology domain (RHD) that binds to DNA. In contrast, only three of the family (p65, RelB and c-Rel) contain transactivation domains (TADs) that interact with general transcription factors and co-activators, whereas p50 and p52 do not. This difference can influence whether a specific dimer has the potential to act as an activator or a repressor. For instance the common heterodimer of p50 and p65 is able to activate gene transcription due to the presence of a TAD in p65. Conversely, homodimers of p50 contain no TAD and they can therefore act as transcriptional repressors by competing for p50/p65 binding to the NF-{kappa}B consensus sequence. In addition, subtle differences in NF-{kappa}B consensus sequences have now been shown to demonstrate preferential binding to different NF-{kappa}B dimers [26]. This is exemplified by the –863 C/A polymorphism in the human TNF-{alpha} promoter. Here, the C allele can bind both p50/50 and p50/p65 dimers, whereas the A allele can bind only the inhibitory p50 homodimer [27] suggesting that the A allele should demonstrate a dampened TNF-{alpha} response following NF-{kappa}B activation. Indeed, this polymorphism may influence the incidence of RA [28].

Once activated, the ability of NF-{kappa}B to induce transcription can be further enhanced by post-translational phosphorylation and acetylation of the subunits [3, 26]. For instance, serine phosphorylation of p65 can occur at different residues and is stimulus specific. Phosphorylated p65 can then be acetylated and this molecule has maximum activity. Acetylation of p65 is performed by CBP and p300, transcriptional coactivators that also recruit the transcriptional machinery. In addition, they have histone acetyltransferase activity, which helps to ‘relax’ the chromatin environment surrounding the activated genes and increase the efficiency of transactivation. Histone modification by NF-{kappa}B can lead to epigenic control of gene transcription, reviewed elsewhere [29].


    The role of NF-{kappa}B—evidence from genetic knockouts
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The experimental approach of murine genetic knockout has been used extensively to examine the NF-{kappa}B pathway. Overall, the results from these studies support the contention that NF-{kappa}B is primarily involved in dynamic responses to the cellular environment. Some of the results that impact inflammation and RA will be summarized here, but the interested reader is referred to one of several more detailed reviews [30–32].

Some knockout mice have a milder phenotype than might have been predicted. For instance, mice with genetic deficiency of the genes encoding p50, p52, c-Rel and RelB develop normally and the mice appear healthy. However, they do have abnormal immune cell responses such as in B and T cell proliferation, antigen presentation, isotype switching, and cytokine production. Furthermore, mice in which the coding regions of I{kappa}Bβ replaced those of I{kappa}B{alpha} are normal and have no inflammatory disease, emphasizing the functional similarity of these two homologous proteins [33]. Mice that lack I{kappa}Bβ have not been published in detail; however, one study found that the effects of intrapulmonary LPS on wild-type and I{kappa}Bβ-deficient mice were identical [34].

In contrast, genetic deficiency of other pathway members results in very severe phenotypes. Mice lacking I{kappa}B{alpha} die 7–10 days after birth due to severe inflammatory dermatitis and granulocytosis, alongside elevated expression of proinflammatory cytokines, emphasizing the importance of I{kappa}B{alpha} in regulating the immune response [30]. Furthermore, p65, NEMO and IKK2 knockouts die during late embryonic development or at birth due to TNF-{alpha}-dependent hepatocyte apoptosis [31, 35–37]. This clearly demonstrates an anti-apoptotic role for the NF-{kappa}B pathway, and the genes up-regulated by NF-{kappa}B following TNF-{alpha} exposure. The role of inappropriate TNF-{alpha} signalling was confirmed when the phenotype of p65-deficient mice was rescued by crossing them with mice deficient in the TNF receptor. However, these mice frequently died, probably due to increased susceptibility to infection [35]. This highlights the delicate balance that exists between inflammation and apoptosis in vertebrate physiology.

Recently, the fatalities in IKK2 and NEMO knockout mice have been bypassed in order to study their role in inflammatory disease. These studies utilized conditional knockouts, where the ‘cre/lox system inactivates the genes in specific cell types. NF-{kappa}B activation was prevented in different cells by removing IKK2 from keratinocytes [38, 39] or IKK1/IKK2 or NEMO from intestinal epithelial cells [40, 41]. Somewhat counter-intuitively, this resulted in chronic inflammation in the affected tissues leading to phenotypes that resembled psoriasis and colitis, respectively. In both models, disease was accompanied by a massive influx of immune cells expressing proinflammatory cytokines (particularly macrophages expressing TNF-{alpha}) and an increase in apoptosis. As above, the phenotypes could be normalized by crossing the animals with TNF receptor knockout mice [39, 41]. This suggested that macrophage produced TNF-{alpha} was a key driver of disease in inflammatory conditions.


    The role of the canonical pathway in RA—primary human cell studies
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The studies described above have been extremely important in establishing the molecular events that can occur in the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway. However, their relevance to the activation of NF-{kappa}B seen in RA cannot be assumed. Important differences in immune cell function exist between humans and mice, and between transformed and non-transformed cells (dealt with in detail subsequently). Research in primary human cells was hampered for many years because these non-dividing cells are resistant to conventional transfection techniques. Recently, this technological challenge was overcome by the use of adenoviral systems that efficiently infect primary cells and deliver exogenous expression constructs. Here, dominant negative (dn) variants of canonical pathway signalling components were expressed in cells that are relevant to RA, including primary synovial cell cultures (containing a mixture of cells) from patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, synovial fibroblasts derived from them, and primary M-CSF differentiated macrophages from normal human blood donors.

In such studies, dnIKK1 was found not to influence spontaneous cytokine production from primary synovial cell cultures, whereas dnI{kappa}B{alpha} and dnIKK2 profoundly inhibited IL-6, IL-8 and VEGF production [42]. Somewhat surprisingly dnIKK2 did not significantly inhibit spontaneous TNF-{alpha} production. However, these findings generally support the hypothesis of an important role for the canonical pathway in RA and that IKK2 is the dominant kinase in the IKK complex. To extend these studies, the dn proteins have also been tested in the different cell types present in the synovial cell cultures. Here, dnIKK2 was found to inhibit cytokine production from both TNF-{alpha} and IL-1β stimulated macrophages and RA synovial fibroblasts. This same molecule could also block IL-6 and IL-8 production in LPS stimulated RA synovial fibroblasts. However, in stark contrast to findings in murine cells, it is interesting to note that dnIKK2 did not affect TNF-{alpha}, IL-6 or IL-8 production following LPS stimulation of human macrophages [42]. This could have suggested that the canonical pathway is of low importance in LPS stimulated macrophages. However, dnI{kappa}B{alpha} effectively blocks expression of TNF-{alpha}, IL-1β, IL-8 and IL-6 production in response to LPS [42, 43]. This suggests that other (unidentified) I{kappa}B phosphorylating kinase(s) are present in these cells. It might also explain why the dnIKK2 could not affect spontaneous TNF-{alpha} production from the synovial cell cultures, since the main source of TNF-{alpha} here is macrophages. I{kappa}B{alpha} also has differential effects on the spontaneous production of different cytokines in primary RA synovial cultures. While IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-1, -3 and -13 were all I{kappa}B{alpha}-dependent as expected, TNF-{alpha} production was not affected [42].

These studies serve to highlight the complexities of the role that the NF-{kappa}B pathway plays in RA. Whilst the pathways activating NF-{kappa}B can be described in a straightforward way, in reality there is enormous variation in the molecular events that can occur between different cell types, in response to different cellular stimuli and for different genes that respond to NF-{kappa}B activation.


    The ‘non-canonical’ pathway of NF-{kappa}B activation
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
An ‘alternative’ or ‘non-canonical’ pathway of NF-{kappa}B activation has been described that occurs specifically in B cells in response to small subset of stimuli [44]. Here p100 itself, rather than an I{kappa}B, acts to sequester RelB in the cytosol. The processing of p100 is tightly regulated and virtually absent in unactivated cells. B cell stimulation with lymphotoxin results in p100 phosphorylation by a complex of IKK1 and NF-{kappa}B inducing kinase (NIK). It then undergoes limited proteolysis by the proteasome, giving rise to p52, and p52/RelB dimers are than able to activate transcription. Both NIK and IKK1 are indispensable for this activity. Recently p100 was shown to be a bona fide member of the I{kappa}B family and designated I{kappa}B{delta} [45]. However, as NIK is not required for NF-{kappa}B activation following TNF-{alpha} or IL-1{alpha} stimulation in primary human macrophages or fibroblasts, nor is it involved in the spontaneous TNF-{alpha} production by RA synovial cell cultures [46], it will not be considered further here.


    Diverse functions of the I{kappa}B family
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In addition to I{kappa}B{alpha} and I{kappa}Bβ, the I{kappa}B family contains several other members that were assigned on the basis of sequence homology (Table 2). All include a series of ankyrin repeats that are important for binding to the Rel proteins, but some of the family play a quite different, yet important, role in the NF-{kappa}B pathway.

Bcl-3, I{kappa}BNS and I{kappa}B{xi} differ from I{kappa}B{alpha} and I{kappa}Bβ, in that they are found not in the cytoplasm but in the nucleus and act as direct co-activators or co-repressors of p50 and/or p52 homodimer-dependent DNA binding [47–51]. In mice, both Bcl-3 and I{kappa}BNS can induce the nuclear localization of p50 homodimers and act as transcriptional co-repressors. However, the activity of the two I{kappa}Bs differs, for whereas I{kappa}BNS specifically inhibits late responsive genes such as IL-6, without affecting the expression of early genes such as TNF-{alpha} [50, 51], Bcl-3 inhibits TNF-{alpha} without affecting IL-6 [52, 53], and this can be explained by the specific recruitment to the respective promoters. Both of these genes can be induced by the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and this may help to explain the resistance to inflammation of colonic lamia propria macrophages, which constitutively express IL-10 as well as Bcl-3 and I{kappa}BNS [50]. However, it should be noted that Bcl-3 can also act as a transcriptional coactivator in some cases [54–56].

The role of I{kappa}B{xi} seems to be primarily as a transactivator of a subset of inflammatory genes including IL-6, IL-12p40 and GM-CSF [57], although it can also inhibit NF-{kappa}B activity when it is overexpressed. I{kappa}B{xi} is strongly and transiently induced following stimulation of cells with IL-1β or LPS but not by TNF-{alpha} and interacts with the p50 subunit in p50/p65 heterodimers. The difference in I{kappa}B{xi} induction seems to be due to mRNA stability. Whereas TNF-{alpha} stimulation does not lead to I{kappa}B{xi} induction on its own, this can be supplemented by the non-NF-{kappa}B activating cytokine IL-17, which is known to stabilize mRNA [49].

Pathological triggers of the NF-{kappa}B signalling cascade in RA
Recently there has been much interest in teasing out the molecular triggers of chronic inflammation in RA, but the factors that cause this remain obscure. Indeed, the spectrum of signalling molecules that can result in NF-{kappa}B activation is large [58]. Signalling via the TNF-{alpha} and IL-1 receptors is a strong contender for mediating the chronic inflammation, since both of the cytokines are abundant in RA synovial fluid. In addition, molecules in the toll-like receptor (TLR) family are potential candidates for receiving and transmitting the triggering event in RA. The TLRs have emerged in recent years as important initiators of the innate immune response, recognizing specific components of pathogenic organisms by means of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). They exert tightly regulated and exquisitely specific responses that have many features in common with signalling via the IL-1R [26, 59]. TLR signalling in primary human macrophages differs in some respects from other cells, since adenoviruses expressing dn forms of the TLR adaptors MyD88, Mal and TRAM did not significantly reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production in response to the TLR4 ligand LPS [60, 61].

The TLRs have become of interest to RA because, whilst no infectious organism has ever been isolated from the joints of RA patients, bacterial products such as DNA (TLR9 ligand) and peptidoglycan (TLR2 ligand) [62] have been detected. These agents are very strong inducers of the type of NF-{kappa}B activity observed in rheumatoid tissue. This suggests that unresolved infection, resulting in TLR activation, could be one of the causes of RA. In addition, other so-called ‘endogenous’ danger signals (compared with the exogenous PAMPs) have been shown to stimulate TLR4 [63–68] and others (TLR2, TLR3 and TLR9). TLR2, TLR3, TLR4 and TLR7 are all strongly upregulated in rheumatoid compared with healthy synovial tissue [69–73].

Other pathways of NF-{kappa}B activation in RA may include cellular stimuli such as cytokine-activated T cells (Tcks) that resemble T cells enriched from RA synovial tissue [74]. Tcks can induce cytokine production from monocytes in a contact- and I{kappa}B{alpha}-dependent manner. Cells that remain in synovial culture after T-cell removal rapidly lose their spontaneous TNF-{alpha} production suggesting that the contact-dependent (‘cognate’) stimulation is driven by NF-{kappa}B [74, 75].


    Disparity in NF-{kappa}B responses between humans and mice, primary cells and transformed cell lines
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
A key outcome of the hundreds of papers that are published annually concerning the NF-{kappa}B pathway is that different stimuli result in different responses, and that these are tuned to precise physiological outcomes required for that stimulus. For instance, viral infection results in a different spectrum of cytokines to bacteria, in line with the characteristics of these different types of infections. In addition, different cell types can also respond differently to the same stimuli, in line with their physiological role. These differences are a reflection of evolutionary pressure and this could explain the observed differences between the human and murine immune systems. Since the lifespan of humans is far longer than that of mice, our lifetime exposure to infection is far greater and our immune systems have evolved to cope with this. One example of this phenomenon is that whereas, in mice, TLR3 stimulation results in the activation of NF-{kappa}B and the production of NF-{kappa}B-responsive cytokines, this does not occur in primary human myeloid-lineage cells [76].

In the field of inflammation, many laboratories have studied the NF-{kappa}B pathway in primary murine cells (immune cells or embryonic fibroblasts), in human or murine transformed immune cell lines or even using overexpression in non-disease-relevant transformed cell lines. The former has obviously made very important contributions to our knowledge of NF-{kappa}B, by facilitating genetic experiments, such as gene knockouts. However, it is also now well recognized that cell lines and primary cells show very significant differences in the signalling pathways in response to inflammatory cytokines and bacterial products. In many respects, this is not surprising since proliferation is inherent to the cell lines, and macrophages do not divide. This is exemplified by a microarray analysis study, in which the expression of many different genes was examined in concert. The differential expression of genes that are expressed in response to LPS was assessed in primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)-derived macrophages, the monocytic leukaemia cell line THP-1 and the histiocytic lymphoma cell line U-937. Many differences were observed between the primary cells and the cell lines, in particular with the U-937 cells [77]. Other studies have shown specific differences in the activity of certain molecules, such as the contribution of NIK to the canonical NF-{kappa}B pathway. Early results in transformed cells suggested that NIK was involved [78], but later studies in NIK knockout and aly/aly mice as well as primary human cells disproved this [46, 79, 80]. Such possibilities must be borne in mind when considering any data obtained in transformed cell lines.


    Potential therapeutic targets in the NF-{kappa}B pathway
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The weight of evidence gathered from RA patients suggests NF-{kappa}B activation is intimately involved in the chronic inflammation of the RA synovium. Consequently, inhibitors of NF-{kappa}B activation are potential candidates as therapeutics for RA. The success of clinical trials for biological treatments that directly target the products of NF-{kappa}B-driven genes, such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-6 and IL-1 has been a major breakthrough in the treatment of RA patients that do not respond to standard treatment [81]. However, these treatments are expensive and are injected rather than orally administered. Therefore, there is much interest in developing specific, small molecular inhibitors that can be given in tablet form in order to reduce NF-{kappa}B activation in RA tissue, leading to attenuated cytokine production.

The canonical IKKs are considered to be amongst the most promising targets in the NF-{kappa}B pathway since they are not known to participate in any pathways other than NF-{kappa}B activation. The major drive by the pharmaceutical industry has been to try to develop small molecular inhibitors of IKK2 because it is considered to be the functionally important kinase and it also plays a pivotal role in transmitting various different stimuli into an NF-{kappa}B response. Most of the inhibitors identified can inhibit both IKK1 and IKK2, often inhibiting IKK2 in the nano-molar range and IKK1 in the micro-molar range. These inhibitors are considered to be selective for IKK2 at therapeutic doses. In contrast, no specific inhibitors of IKK1 have been described. The IKK2 inhibitors that have been in development were recently reviewed in [82, 83], but this is potentially a lucrative area of research and new inhibitors are regularly discovered [84–86]. Good candidates under development include SPC-839 and SC-514 (ATP-competitive inhibitors), BMS-345541 (non-competitive inhibitor), TPCA-1 and ML120B [82, 83, 87]. These have all shown success in in vitro models of NF-{kappa}B activation as well as different animal models including endotoxin challenge in rats (SPC-839, SC-514) and CIA (BMS-345541, TPCA-1 and ML120B), although BMS-345541 was only effective if administered before the onset of disease [88]. Indeed, using in vivo imaging, ML120B was recently shown to suppress NF-{kappa}B and active proteases in live mice with CIA [89].

One potential drawback of the small molecule inhibitor approach is caused by the way that they are tested for target specificity. New inhibitors are routinely tested against large panels of kinases and are considered to be specific if they do not ‘hit’ any other tested kinase. However, the kinome is an order of magnitude larger than these panels, and using proteomic approaches established inhibitors have now been found to be far less specific than thought (for instance, [90]). Biological approaches would circumvent this problem, and these are also being pursued to inhibit the action of IKK2. A gene therapy approach resulting in the expression of dnIKK2 in diseased cells should dampen the NF-{kappa}B response. This is attractive because a strategy of intra-articular injection of dnIKK2 expressing adeno-associated virus (AAV) would result in NF-{kappa}B inhibition only in the affected joints, rather than a systemic reduction in NF-{kappa}B. Preliminary data from a rat model of adjuvant-induced arthritis suggests that this approach may be viable [91].

Whilst much effort is being exerted to develop IKK2 inhibitors, murine genetic models of IKK complex inactivation give cause for concern regarding their long-term use in patients with RA. In the conditional knockouts, where NF-{kappa}B activation was prevented in keratinocytes or epithelial cells, a functional NF-{kappa}B system in macrophages resulted in TNF-{alpha} production, causing uncontrolled inflammation. It will be important to guarantee effective shut-down of macrophages in patients receiving IKK2 inhibitors, to ensure that the risk of accompanying inflammatory disease in other organs is avoided. Given that NF-{kappa}B activation in primary human M-CSF-derived macrophages is only IKK2-dependent in response to IL-1β and TNF-{alpha} but not LPS [42], this may prove to be a stumbling block for these therapies.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
It is now clear that NF-{kappa}B is a key player in the pathogenesis of RA, and is central to the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in the inflamed synovium. However, whilst much is known about the signalling pathways that result in NF-{kappa}B activation in transformed cells and in mice, these events often differ in the cells that are relevant to RA, such as primary human myeloid cells and cells of the synovium. These events are only being fully explored now, using new technologies such as adenoviral infection. Doubtlessly, cutting-edge technologies, such as small inhibiting (si) RNA, will also give great insights into the functional roles of these proteins in the future. This will be important to help identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of RA and validate those therapies already under development. The exquisitely specific NF-{kappa}B response induced by different stimuli in different cells gives hope that treatments can be developed to specifically target NF-{kappa}B activation in the inflamed synovium without detrimental effects on the innate immune system. This could overcome potentially serious problems that may occur as a result of long-term NF-{kappa}B inactivation.

Formula


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The authors thank Dr Theresa Page and Stefan Drexler for critical reading of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 NF-{kappa}B is activated in...
 Core principles of the...
 The role of NF-{kappa}B-...
 The role of the...
 The 'non-canonical' pathway of...
 Diverse functions of the...
 Disparity in NF-{kappa}B...
 Potential therapeutic targets in...
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Kucharczak J, Simmons MJ, Fan Y, Gelinas C. To be, or not to be: NF-kappaB is the answer–role of Rel/NF-kappaB in the regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene (2003) 22:8961–82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Youssef S, Steinman L. At once harmful and beneficial: the dual properties of NF-kappaB. Nat Immunol (2006) 7:901–2.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Chen LF, Greene WC. Shaping the nuclear action of NF-kappaB. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2004) 5:392–401.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. May MJ, Ghosh S. Signal transduction through NF-kappa B. Immunol Today (1998) 19:80–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Li Q, Lu Q, Bottero V, et al. Enhanced NF-kappaB activation and cellular function in macrophages lacking IkappaB kinase 1 (IKK1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2005) 102:12425–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ciesielski CJ, Andreakos E, Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. TNFalpha-induced macrophage chemokine secretion is more dependent on NF-kappaB expression than lipopolysaccharides-induced macrophage chemokine secretion. Eur J Immunol (2002) 32:2037–45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Muller-Ladner U, Pap T, Gay RE, Neidhart M, Gay S. Mechanisms of disease: the molecular and cellular basis of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol (2005) 1:102–10.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Feldmann M, Maini RN. Anti-TNF alpha therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned? Annu Rev Immunol (2001) 19:163–96.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Fujisawa K, Aono H, Hasunuma T, Yamamoto K, Mita S, Nishioka K. Activation of transcription factor NF-kappa B in human synovial cells in response to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum (1996) 39:197–203.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Roshak AK, Jackson JR, McGough K, Chabot-Fletcher M, Mochan E, Marshall LA. Manipulation of distinct NFkappaB proteins alters interleukin-1beta-induced human rheumatoid synovial fibroblast prostaglandin E2 formation. J Biol Chem (1996) 271:31496–501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yamasaki S, Kawakami A, Nakashima T, et al. Importance of NF-kappaB in rheumatoid synovial tissues: in situ NF-kappaB expression and in vitro study using cultured synovial cells. Ann Rheum Dis (2001) 60:678–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Carlsen H, Moskaug JO, Fromm SH, Blomhoff R. In vivo imaging of NF-{kappa}B activity. J Immunol (2002) 168:1441–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sioud M, Mellbye O, Forre O. Analysis of the NF-kappa B p65 subunit, Fas antigen, Fas ligand and Bcl-2-related proteins in the synovium of RA and polyarticular JRA. Clin Exp Rheumatol (1998) 16:125–34.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Marok R, Winyard PG, Coumbe A, et al. Activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB in human inflamed synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum (1996) 39:583–91.[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Handel ML, McMorrow LB, Gravallese EM. Nuclear factor-kappa B in rheumatoid synovium. Localization of p50 and p65. Arthritis Rheum (1995) 38:1762–70.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Benito MJ, Murphy E, Murphy EP, van den Berg WB, FitzGerald O, Bresnihan B. Increased synovial tissue NF-kappa B1 expression at sites adjacent to the cartilage-pannus junction in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:1781–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Danning CL, Illei GG, Hitchon C, Greer MR, Boumpas DT, McInnes IB. Macrophage-derived cytokine and nuclear factor kappaB p65 expression in synovial membrane and skin of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2000) 43:1244–56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Tsao PW, Suzuki T, Totsuka R, et al. The effect of dexamethasone on the expression of activated NF-kappa B in adjuvant arthritis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol (1997) 83:173–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Han Z, Boyle DL, Manning AM, Firestein GS. AP-1 and NF-kappaB regulation in rheumatoid arthritis and murine collagen-induced arthritis. Autoimmunity (1998) 28:197–208.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Campbell IK, Gerondakis S, O’Donnell K, Wicks IP. Distinct roles for the NF-kappaB1 (p50) and c-Rel transcription factors in inflammatory arthritis. J Clin Invest (2000) 105:1799–806.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Lawrence T, Bebien M, Liu GY, Nizet V, Karin M. IKKalpha limits macrophage NF-kappaB activation and contributes to the resolution of inflammation. Nature (2005) 434:1138–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Yamaoka S, Courtois G, Bessia C, et al. Complementation cloning of NEMO, a component of the IkappaB kinase complex essential for NF-kappaB activation. Cell (1998) 93:1231–40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Rothwarf DM, Zandi E, Natoli G, Karin M. IKK-gamma is an essential regulatory subunit of the IkappaB kinase complex. Nature (1998) 395:297–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Covert MW, Leung TH, Gaston JE, Baltimore D. Achieving stability of lipopolysaccharide-induced NF-kappaB activation. Science (2005) 309:1854–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kearns JD, Basak S, Werner SL, Huang CS, Hoffmann A. IkappaBepsilon provides negative feedback to control NF-kappaB oscillations, signaling dynamics, and inflammatory gene expression. J Cell Biol (2006) 173:659–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Doyle SL, O’Neill LA. Toll-like receptors: from the discovery of NFkappaB to new insights into transcriptional regulations in innate immunity. Biochem Pharmacol (2006) 72:1102–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Udalova IA, Richardson A, Denys A, et al. Functional consequences of a polymorphism affecting NF-kappaB p50-p50 binding to the TNF promoter region. Mol Cell Biol (2000) 20:9113–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Udalova IA, Richardson A, Ackerman H, Wordsworth P, Kwiatkowski D. Association of accelerated erosive rheumatoid arthritis with a polymorphism that alters NF-kappaB binding to the TNF promoter region. Rheumatology (2002) 41:830–1.[Free Full Text]
  29. Vanden Berghe W, Ndlovu MN, Hoya-Arias R, Dijsselbloem N, Gerlo S, Haegeman G. Keeping up NF-kappaB appearances: epigenetic control of immunity or inflammation-triggered epigenetics. Biochem Pharmacol (2006) 72:1114–31.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Gerondakis S, Grossmann M, Nakamura Y, Pohl T, Grumont R. Genetic approaches in mice to understand Rel/NF-kappaB and IkappaB function: transgenics and knockouts. Oncogene (1999) 18:6888–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Gerondakis S, Grumont R, Gugasyan R, et al. Unravelling the complexities of the NF-kappaB signalling pathway using mouse knockout and transgenic models. Oncogene (2006) 25:6781–99.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Pasparakis M, Luedde T, Schmidt-Supprian M. Dissection of the NF-kappaB signalling cascade in transgenic and knockout mice. Cell Death Differ (2006) 13:861–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Cheng JD, Ryseck RP, Attar RM, Dambach D, Bravo R. Functional redundancy of the nuclear factor kappa B inhibitors I kappa B alpha and I kappa B beta. J Exp Med (1998) 188:1055–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mizgerd JP, Scott ML, Spieker MR, Doerschuk CM. Functions of IkappaB proteins in inflammatory responses to Escherichia coli LPS in mouse lungs. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol (2002) 27:575–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Alcamo E, Mizgerd JP, Horwitz BH, et al. Targeted mutation of TNF receptor I rescues the RelA-deficient mouse and reveals a critical role for NF-kappa B in leukocyte recruitment. J Immunol (2001) 167:1592–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Kim S, La Motte-Mohs RN, Rudolph D, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Mak TW. The role of nuclear factor-kappaB essential modulator (NEMO) in B cell development and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100:1203–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Li Q, Van Antwerp D, Mercurio F, Lee KF, Verma IM. Severe liver degeneration in mice lacking the IkappaB kinase 2 gene. Science (1999) 284:321–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Stratis A, Pasparakis M, Rupec RA, et al. Pathogenic role for skin macrophages in a mouse model of keratinocyte-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation. J Clin Invest (2006) 116:2094–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Pasparakis M, Courtois G, Hafner M, et al. TNF-mediated inflammatory skin disease in mice with epidermis-specific deletion of IKK2. Nature (2002) 417:861–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Zaph C, Troy AE, Taylor BC, et al. Epithelial-cell-intrinsic IKK-beta expression regulates intestinal immune homeostasis. Nature (2007) 446:552–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Nenci A, Becker C, Wullaert A, et al. Epithelial NEMO links innate immunity to chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature (2007) 446:557–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Andreakos E, Smith C, Kiriakidis S, et al. Heterogeneous requirement of IkappaB kinase 2 for inflammatory cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase production in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for therapy. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 48:1901–12.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Bondeson J, Browne KA, Brennan FM, Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Selective regulation of cytokine induction by adenoviral gene transfer of IkappaBalpha into human macrophages: lipopolysaccharide-induced, but not zymosan-induced, proinflammatory cytokines are inhibited, but IL-10 is nuclear factor-kappaB independent. J Immunol (1999) 162:2939–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Xiao G, Rabson AB, Young W, Qing G, Qu Z. Alternative pathways of NF-kappaB activation: a double-edged sword in health and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2006) 17:281–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  45. Basak S, Kim H, Kearns JD, et al. A fourth IkappaB protein within the NF-kappaB signaling module. Cell (2007) 128:369–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  46. Smith C, Andreakos E, Crawley JB, Brennan FM, Feldmann M, Foxwell BM. NF-kappaB-inducing kinase is dispensable for activation of NF-kappaB in inflammatory settings but essential for lymphotoxin beta receptor activation of NF-kappaB in primary human fibroblasts. J Immunol (2001) 167:5895–903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Bours V, Franzoso G, Azarenko V, et al. The oncoprotein Bcl-3 directly transactivates through kappa B motifs via association with DNA-binding p50B homodimers. Cell (1993) 72:729–39.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  48. Motoyama M, Yamazaki S, Eto-Kimura A, Takeshige K, Muta T. Positive and negative regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated transcription by IkappaB-zeta, an inducible nuclear protein. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:7444–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Yamazaki S, Muta T, Matsuo S, Takeshige K. Stimulus-specific induction of a novel nuclear factor-kappaB regulator, IkappaB-zeta, via Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor is mediated by mRNA stabilization. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:1678–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Hirotani T, Lee PY, Kuwata H, et al. The nuclear IkappaB protein IkappaBNS selectively inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 production in macrophages of the colonic lamina propria. J Immunol (2005) 174:3650–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kuwata H, Matsumoto M, Atarashi K, et al. IkappaBNS inhibits induction of a subset of Toll-like receptor-dependent genes and limits inflammation. Immunity (2006) 24:41–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  52. Wessells J, Baer M, Young HA, et al. BCL-3 and NF-kappaB p50 attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages. J Biol Chem (2004) 279:49995–50003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Kuwata H, Watanabe Y, Miyoshi H, et al. IL-10-inducible Bcl-3 negatively regulates LPS-induced TNF-alpha production in macrophages. Blood (2003) 102:4123–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Nolan GP, Fujita T, Bhatia K, et al. The bcl-3 proto-oncogene encodes a nuclear I kappa B-like molecule that preferentially interacts with NF-kappa B p50 and p52 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol (1993) 13:3557–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Franzoso G, Bours V, Azarenko V, et al. The oncoprotein Bcl-3 can facilitate NF-kappa B-mediated transactivation by removing inhibiting p50 homodimers from select kappa B sites. EMBO J (1993) 12:3893–901.[Web of Science][Medline]
  56. Zhang Q, Didonato JA, Karin M, McKeithan TW. BCL3 encodes a nuclear protein which can alter the subcellular location of NF-kappa B proteins. Mol Cell Biol (1994) 14:3915–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Yamamoto M, Yamazaki S, Uematsu S, et al. Regulation of Toll/IL-1-receptor-mediated gene expression by the inducible nuclear protein IkappaBzeta. Nature (2004) 430:218–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Perkins ND. Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-kappaB and IKK function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2007) 8:49–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  59. Pandey S, Agrawal DK. Immunobiology of toll-like receptors: emerging trends. Immunol Cell Biol (2006) 84:333–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Andreakos E, Sacre SM, Smith C, et al. Distinct pathways of LPS-induced NF-kappa B activation and cytokine production in human myeloid and nonmyeloid cells defined by selective utilization of MyD88 and Mal/TIRAP. Blood (2004) 103:2229–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Sacre SM, Lundberg AM, Andreakos E, Taylor C, Feldmann M, Foxwell BM. Selective use of TRAM in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) induced NF-kappaB activation and cytokine production in primary human cells: TRAM is an adaptor for LPS and LTA signaling. J Immunol (2007) 178:2148–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. van der Heijden IM, Wilbrink B, Tchetverikov I, et al. Presence of bacterial DNA and bacterial peptidoglycans in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritides. Arthritis Rheum (2000) 43:593–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  63. Yu M, Wang H, Ding A, et al. HMGB1 signals through toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR2. Shock (2006) 26:174–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  64. Sato H, Miyata M, Kasukawa R. Expression of heat shock protein on lymphocytes in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol (1996) 23:2027–32.[Web of Science][Medline]
  65. Ohashi K, Burkart V, Flohe S, Kolb H. Cutting edge: heat shock protein 60 is a putative endogenous ligand of the toll-like receptor-4 complex. J Immunol (2000) 164:558–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Roelofs MF, Boelens WC, Joosten LA, et al. Identification of small heat shock protein B8 (HSP22) as a novel TLR4 ligand and potential involvement in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol (2006) 176:7021–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Okamura Y, Watari M, Jerud ES, et al. The extra domain A of fibronectin activates toll-like receptor 4. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:10229–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Termeer C, Benedix F, Sleeman J, et al. Oligosaccharides of hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med (2002) 195:99–111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Seibl R, Birchler T, Loeliger S, et al. Expression and regulation of Toll-like receptor 2 in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Am J Pathol (2003) 162:1221–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Iwahashi M, Yamamura M, Aita T, et al. Expression of toll-like receptor 2 on CD16+ blood monocytes and synovial tissue macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:1457–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  71. Radstake TR, Roelofs MF, Jenniskens YM, et al. Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in rheumatoid synovial tissue and regulation by proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 via interferon-gamma. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:3856–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  72. Brentano F, Schorr O, Gay RE, Gay S, Kyburz D. RNA released from necrotic synovial fluid cells activates rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts via toll-like receptor 3. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 52:2656–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  73. Roelofs MF, Joosten LA, Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, et al. The expression of toll-like receptors 3 and 7 in rheumatoid arthritis synovium is increased and costimulation of toll-like receptors 3, 4, and 7/8 results in synergistic cytokine production by dendritic cells. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 52:2313–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  74. Brennan FM, Hayes AL, Ciesielski CJ, Green P, Foxwell BM, Feldmann M. Evidence that rheumatoid arthritis synovial T cells are similar to cytokine-activated T cells: involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and nuclear factor kappaB pathways in tumor necrosis factor alpha production in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2002) 46:31–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  75. Beech JT, Andreakos E, Ciesielski CJ, Green P, Foxwell BM, Brennan FM. T-cell contact-dependent regulation of CC and CXC chemokine production in monocytes through differential involvement of NFkappaB: implications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther (2006) 8:R168.[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. Lundberg AM, Drexler SK, Monaco C, et al. Key differences in TLR3/poly I:C signaling and cytokine induction by human primary cells: a phenomenon absent from murine cell systems. Blood (2007) 110:3245–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Sharif O, Bolshakov VN, Raines S, Newham P, Perkins ND. Transcriptional profiling of the LPS induced NF-kappaB response in macrophages. BMC Immunol (2007) 8:1.[CrossRef][Medline]
  78. Malinin NL, Boldin MP, Kovalenko AV, Wallach D. MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF-kappaB induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1. Nature (1997) 385:540–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  79. Shinkura R, Kitada K, Matsuda F, et al. Alymphoplasia is caused by a point mutation in the mouse gene encoding Nf-kappa b-inducing kinase. Nat Genet (1999) 22:74–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  80. Yin L, Wu L, Wesche H, et al. Defective lymphotoxin-beta receptor-induced NF-kappaB transcriptional activity in NIK-deficient mice. Science (2001) 291:2162–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Sacre SM, Andreakos E, Taylor P, Feldmann M, Foxwell BM. Molecular therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Mol Med (2005) 7:1–20.[Medline]
  82. Karin M, Yamamoto Y, Wang QM. The IKK NF-kappa B system: a treasure trove for drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2004) 3:17–26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  83. Drexler S, Turner JJO, Foxwell BM. Clinical prospects of NF-kappaB inhibitors. In: Further Targeted Therapies in Rheumatology.—Smolen JS, Lipsky P, eds. (2007.) London: Martin Dunitz. In press.
  84. Christopher JA, Avitabile BG, Bamborough P, et al. The discovery of 2-amino-3,5-diarylbenzamide inhibitors of IKK-alpha and IKK-beta kinases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2007) 17:3972–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  85. Belema M, Bunker A, Nguyen VN, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of imidazo(1,2-a)thieno(3,2-e)pyrazines as IKK-beta inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2007) 17:4284–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. Bonafoux D, Bonar S, Christine L, et al. Inhibition of IKK-2 by 2-[(aminocarbonyl)amino]-5-acetylenyl-3-thiophenecarboxamides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2005) 15:2870–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  87. Podolin PL, Callahan JF, Bolognese BJ, et al. Attenuation of murine collagen-induced arthritis by a novel, potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of IkappaB Kinase 2, TPCA-1 (2-[(aminocarbonyl)amino]-5-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-thiophenecarboxamide), occurs via reduction of proinflammatory cytokines and antigen-induced T cell proliferation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2005) 312:373–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. McIntyre KW, Shuster DJ, Gillooly KM, et al. A highly selective inhibitor of I kappa B kinase, BMS-345541, blocks both joint inflammation and destruction in collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 48:2652–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  89. Izmailova ES, Paz N, Alencar H, et al. Use of molecular imaging to quantify response to IKK-2 inhibitor treatment in murine arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 56:117–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  90. Godl K, Wissing J, Kurtenbach A, et al. An efficient proteomics method to identify the cellular targets of protein kinase inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100:15434–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Tas SW, Adriaansen J, Hajji N, et al. Amelioration of arthritis by intraarticular dominant negative Ikk beta gene therapy using adeno-associated virus type 5. Hum Gene Ther (2006) 17:821–32.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  92. Yamazaki S, Muta T, Takeshige K. A novel IkappaB protein, IkappaB-zeta, induced by proinflammatory stimuli, negatively regulates nuclear factor-kappaB in the nuclei. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:27657–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Submitted 13 July 2007; revised version accepted 4 October 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Largo, M. J. Martinez-Calatrava, O. Sanchez-Pernaute, M. E. Marcos, J. Moreno-Rubio, C. Aparicio, J. Egido, and G. Herrero-Beaumont
Effect of a high dose of glucosamine on systemic and tissue inflammation in an experimental model of atherosclerosis aggravated by chronic arthritis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): H268 - H276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. E. Simmonds, F. V. Lali, T. Smallie, P. L. C. Small, and B. M. Foxwell
Mycolactone Inhibits Monocyte Cytokine Production by a Posttranscriptional Mechanism
J. Immunol., February 15, 2009; 182(4): 2194 - 2202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. Montecucco and F. Mach
Common inflammatory mediators orchestrate pathophysiological processes in rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis
Rheumatology, January 1, 2009; 48(1): 11 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
Rheumatology First Quarter 2008 Quiz
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/5/584    most recent
kem298v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foxwell, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simmonds, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Foxwell, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?