Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 7, 2008
Rheumatology 2008 47(9):1432-1433; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken243
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/9/1432    most recent
ken243v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, L.
Right arrow Articles by Andreu, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, L.
Right arrow Articles by Andreu, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Repairing erosions in rheumatoid arthritis. A realistic goal

L. Silva1, M. Fernández-Castro1 and J.-L. Andreu1

1Department of Rheumatology, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence to: J.-L. Andreu, Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro San Martín de Porres 4, 28035, Madrid. E-mail: jlandreu{at}arrakis.es

SIR, Persistent inflammation in RA is an osteodestructive process, which leads to an accumulation of joint damage over time. Bone loss in RA occurs both in the joints and throughout the skeleton as a result of the multifactorial increase in bone resorption. Bone erosion starts early in disease and progresses most rapidly during the first year. The structural joint damage that is evident on conventional radiographs is strongly associated with poor functional outcome in patients with RA. These findings have fostered the concepts that retardation, arrest or even repair of structural damage should be considered central goals in the treatment of RA. We report a case of a woman with a long-evolution RA, in whom erosion repairing was achieved.

The patient was a 65-yr-old woman who had been diagnosed with a positive RF RA in 1985. Since then, she had received multiple DMARDs (aurothiomalate, chloroquine, MTX, SSZ, HCQ, LEF and infliximab) without achieving a satisfactory clinical response. Radiographs taken during those years revealed disease progression, as illustrated by the serial images of her left first MCP joint (Fig. 1). In 2004, etanercept plus low-dose weekly MTX was initiated, obtaining an excellent clinical response, with the 28-joint disease activity score persistently under 3.2. Radiographs taken after 2 and 3 yrs with etanercept plus MTX showed repair of the erosions (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. Evolution of joint erosions in the left first MCP joint of a patient with severe RA, from 1987 to 2007. Therapy with etanercept was initiated in 2004, with excellent control of the inflammatory activity of the disease.

 
RA results in extensive bone resorption as evidenced by focal bone erosions, juxta-articular osteopenia and systemic osteoporosis. Osteoclasts, specialized bone resorbing cells regulated by RANK ligand (RANKL) and monocyte colony-stimulating factor, are implicated in RA joint erosion [1]. Blockade of RANKL does not inhibit inflammation, but can prevent the structural damage progression that often occurs despite use of disease-modifying drugs, preserving joint architecture and function in RA patients. Anti-TNF agents (infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab) have shown the potential to arrest radiological damage in patients with active RA [2–4]. In this sense, the results from the Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) study suggest that etanercept in combination with MTX slows the radiographic progression in RA [5]. In this study, more patients receiving combination therapy had negative scores in the radiographic measurement after 1 and 2 yrs, compared with patients in either of the monotherapy groups, which could mean an effective repair of structural damage [5,6]. The exact mechanism by which this protection occurs has not been fully determined, but it is thought that TNF-{alpha} antagonists modulate the osteoprotegerin (OPG)/RANKL system. In fact, increased expression of OPG, and subsequent decrease in the RANKL : OPG ratio, in synovial tissue have been seen in patients following therapy with an anti-TNF-{alpha} agent [7].

But the ambitious goal to repair bone erosions in RA could be achieved not only with the control of the inflammation, since new powerful agents are being developed to inhibit osteoclast function. Denosumab, a fully human neutralizing antibody directed against RANKL, has been demonstrated to increase bone mass at both axial and peripheral skeletal sites, as well as in trabecular and cortical areas of bone [8]. It can probably prevent not only the generalized bone loss in RA, but also the joint destruction inhibiting the bone erosion [9]. On the other hand, zoledronic acid is a potent third-generation aminobisphosphonate that is thought to act by inhibiting the osteoclast lifespan. It has been suggested that, added to MTX, it reduces the number of bone erosions in RA [10].

It seems clear that the new challenge in the treatment of RA should be not only to arrest the structural damage, but also to repair the previous erosions. Anti-TNF-{alpha} therapy, zoledronic acid and denosumab, alone or in combined therapy, are among the potential candidates to achieve that ambitious but, we think, realistic goal.

Formula

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. O’Gradaigh D, Ireland D, Bord S, Compston JE. Joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: interactions between tumour necrosis factor {alpha}, interleukin 1, and receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL) regulate osteoclasts. Ann Rheum Dis (2004) 63:354–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lipsky P, van der Heijde D, St Clair W, et al. Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med (2000) 343:1594–602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bathon J, Martin R, Fleischmann R, et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med (2000) 343:1586–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Keystone E, Kavanaugh A, Sharp J, et al. Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy. A randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50:1400–11.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodríguez-Valverde V, et al. Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum (2006) 54:1063–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Klareskog L, et al. Presentation and analysis of data on radiographic outcome in clinical trials. Experience from the TEMPO study. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 52:49–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Catrina AI, af Klint E, Ernestam S, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy increases synovial osteoprotegerin expression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2006) 54:76–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, et al. AMG 162 Bone Loss Study Group. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med (2006) 354:821–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cohen SB, Dore R, Lane N, et al. Denosumab treatment effects on structural damage, bone mineral density, and bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum (2008) 58:1299–309.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Jarrett SJ, Conaghan PG, Sloan VS, et al. Preliminary evidence for a structural benefit of the new bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2006) 54:1410–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Accepted 4 June 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/9/1432    most recent
ken243v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, L.
Right arrow Articles by Andreu, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, L.
Right arrow Articles by Andreu, J.-L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?