Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2008 47(Supplement 5):v33-v35; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken306
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Román, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Román, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Rheumatology issue: Update in systemic sclerosis [View the issue table of contents]

Screening for PAH in patients with systemic sclerosis: focus on Doppler echocardiography

J. Sánchez-Román1, C. F. Opitz2, O. Kowal-Bielecka3, F. J. García-Hernández1, M. J. Castillo-Palma1, D. Pittrow4 for the EPOSS-OMERACT Group

1Collagenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension Unit, University Hospital ‘Virgen del Rocío’, Seville, Spain, 2Department of Internal Medicine, DRK Kliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland and 4Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Correspondence to: J. Sánchez-Román, Plaza de San Martín, 3-F 2a, 41003 Seville, Spain. E-mail: sanchezroman{at}nacom.es


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
It is well established that patients with CTDs such as SSc carry a considerable risk of developing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Such SSc-PAH patients have an even worse prognosis than patients with only one of these two conditions. In view of the high incidence and prevalence of PAH in SSc, and the available treatment options that improve quality of life, exercise capacity and possibly survival, systematic screening has been recommended. The present article reviews current recommendations from PAH guidelines, focusing on studies that used Doppler echocardiography for screening, and describes limitations associated with the procedure. Furthermore, characteristics and parameters used to identify patients at high risk of developing PAH are summarized.

KEY WORDS: Doppler echochardiography, Screening, Pulmonary arterial hypertension, Guidelines, Predictors


    Background
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), currently defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) >25 mmHg at rest or >30 mmHg during exercise with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure <15 mmHg measured by right heart catheterization, is a frequent complication in patients with SSc. Estimates based on echocardiographic screening (confirmed by right heart catheter) suggest that 8% (French centres in the ItinérAIR Sclérodermie Survey) up to 15% (UK) of SSc patients develop PAH [1]. Patients with SSc-PAH have a considerably poorer prognosis than individuals with other forms of PAH. Early studies showed a median survival of only 12 months in untreated symptomatic patients, and the risk of death was increased 3-fold [2].

However, with the advent of various disease-specific drugs (prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists, phoshodiesterase-5 inhibitors), evidence-based treatment of SSc-PAH patients has become the standard, resulting in improvements in exercise capacity, quality of life and possibly survival.


    Screening recommendations in PAH guidelines
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The high incidence and prevalence of PAH in SSc, together with the devastating course if untreated, and the possibility of treating this complication, form the basis for recommendations to systematically and regularly screen this at-risk patient population.

The British Cardiac Society guidelines issued in 2001 recommend annual Doppler echocardiography in SSc patients to identify PAH patients [3]. The PAH guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), while acknowledging that some experts advise screening of asymptomatic SSc patients, in 2004 recommended a complete and careful echocardiographic assessment of patients in the presence of a PAH-related symptom [4]. The WHO Venice guidelines (2004) advise periodic screening for PAH using Doppler echocardiography, among other techniques, in the scleroderma spectrum of disease (but provide no guidance on specific time intervals for screening) [5]. The updated guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend Doppler echocardiographic screening in asymptomatic patients at high risk (quality of evidence: expert opinion; benefit: intermediate; strength of recommendation: moderate, based on expert opinion only) [6]. In patients with SSc, ACCP recommends pulmonary function testing with diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) performed periodically (every 6–12 months) to improve detection of pulmonary vascular or interstitial disease (quality of evidence: fair; benefit: intermediate; strength of recommendation: moderate) [6]. Finally, the National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK and Ireland recommend in their 2008 guidelines, that screening should be performed annually in patients with lcSSc or MCTD with U1 RNP antibodies, using echocardiography and DLCO. Furthermore, right heart catheterization (RHC) should be performed in all cases with a peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (VTR) of >2.8 m/s on echocardiography or a reduction in DLCO of 50% in the absence of interstitial lung disease. In contrast, patients with other CTDs should only be screened in the presence of symptoms [7].


    Choice of echocardiographic parameters
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The guidelines agree on the use of echocardiography as the screening tool of choice in the SSc patient group. However, there is currently no unequivocal guidance about the choice of parameters and thresholds to be used to identify PAH. Several groups performed screening studies using various Doppler parameters (in some cases, with subsequent confirmation of the diagnosis with RHC). An overview is provided in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Overview on echo Doppler parameters used for PAH screening in SSc patients

 
The studies used the VTR to estimate systolic PAP. This parameter is sensu stricto not measured, but calculated based on a formula using VTR plus right atrial pressure, which represents right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). In the absence of a pulmonary valve gradient, RVSP equals systolic PAP.


    Validation of echocardiographic parameters
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
It is well known that there is substantial variation among echocardiographers in their technique, as well as the accuracy of measurements and interpretation of results. Little effort has been made to validate the use of echocardiography in SSc-PAH. In contrast to RHC, echocardiography cannot distinguish between elevated PAP resulting from PAH or from post-capillary causes such as diastolic dysfunction of the left heart. Moreover, it is not possible to obtain PAP values in up to 20–30% of patients because of technical and patient-related problems such as obesity [8]. Further, although the accuracy of echocardiography has been tested against RHC (the gold standard), its retest reliability has not been validated in SSc [8]. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of this screening technique depend on the thresholds used, with the sole use of echocardiography considered to be of limited value (a combination of non-invasive techniques is possibly more useful) [9].

In the most comprehensive and current systematic literature review to date (2008), Kowal-Bielecka et al. [10] summarized the validation status of Doppler echocardiography in SSc-PAH on the basis of 35 studies including significant subgroups of SSc-PAH patients. While echo was considered feasible and to have face validity, it was considered only partially validated with respect to criterion validity based on significant correlations between echocardiographic measures and RHC in SSc patients considered to be at high risk of pulmonary hypertension. No controlled studies enabling evaluation of the discriminant capacity of echo in PAH/SSc-PAH were found. Good inter- and intra-observer reliability was reported for a limited number of parameters (e.g. right ventricular ejection fraction) in a more general SSc population [10].

Consequently, while Doppler echocardiography is regularly being used in SSc-PAH patients and according to a recent Delphi study, regarded as a key tool in the assessment of PAH in SSc [11], rheumatologists and others need to be cautious about the validity and credibility of studies using Doppler echo to screen for, or to follow-up, PAH in SSc patients.


    Further characteristics to define SSc patientsat high risk of PAH
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Despite these limitations, there is presently no alternative to echocardiography in daily clinical practice. It should be noted that on the basis of multivariate analyses, a number of characteristics or parameters have been reported that might be useful to identify those SSc patients who have a particularly high risk of developing PAH. Schachna et al. (2003) identified only late age at onset of SSc as a risk factor. Steen and Medsger [12] found in lcSSc, over a 15-yr time period that patients who subsequently develop isolated PAH, showed a progressive deterioration in the DLCO, severity of RP and of digital tip ulcers, and a potential protective role of calcium channel blocking agents. In SSc, Allanore et al. [13] have demonstrated that elevated levels of natriuretic peptides [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] were associated with an early increase of PAP in echocardiography. Very recently, in a prospective follow-up of 101 SSc patients initially free of PAH, these authors identified eight patients who developed PAH after a mean of 28 months [14]. On multivariate analysis, a decrease in DLCO and an increase in NT-proBNP levels measured at baseline after wash-out of vasodilators, both were independent predictors for the occurrence of PAH. The combination of an increased NT-proBNP level (a reflection of cardiac wall stress) together with a decreased DLCO/alveolar volume (DLCO/VA) ratio of <70% (as the reflection of limited capillary gas exchange) predicted the occurrence of PAH during follow-up with a hazard ratio of 47 (95% CI 5, 450).

Prospective studies are needed to confirm the predictive value of the various proposed factors for PAH.

Formula


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The EPOSS-OMERACT group was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Allschwil, Switzerland, and Encysive Pharmaceuticals Ltd., London, UK.

Supplement: This paper forms part of the supplement entitled ‘Update in systemic sclerosis’. This supplement was supported by an unrestricted grant from Encysive.

Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Background
 Screening recommendations in PAH...
 Choice of echocardiographic...
 Validation of echocardiographic...
 Further characteristics to...
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Mukerjee D, St George D, Coleiro B, et al. Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach. Ann Rheum Dis (2003) 62:1088–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kawut SM, Taichman DB, Archer-Chicko CL, Palevsky HI, Kimmel SE. Hemodynamics and survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis. Chest (2003) 123:344–50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee, and approved by the British Thoracic Society and the British Society of Rheumatology. Recommendations on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice. Heart (2001) 86((Suppl. 1)):I1–I13.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Galie N, Torbicki A, Barst R, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The task force on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J (2004) 25:2243–78.[Free Full Text]
  5. Barst RJ, McGoon M, Torbicki A, et al. Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43(12 Suppl. S):40S–7S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Badesch DB, Abman SH, Simonneau G, Rubin LJ, McLaughlin VV. Medical therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: updated ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest (2007) 131:1917–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. National Pulmonary Hypertension Centres of the UK. Consensus statement on the management of pulmonary hypertension in clinical practice in the UK and Ireland. Heart (2008) 94((Suppl. 1)):i1–i41.[Free Full Text]
  8. Merkel PA, Clements PJ, Reveille JD, Suarez-Almazor ME, Valentini G, Furst DE. Current status of outcome measure development for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis. Report from OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol (2003) 30:1630–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hsu VM, Moreyra AE, Wilson AC, et al. Assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: comparison of noninvasive tests with results of right-heart catheterization. J Rheumatol (2008) 35:458–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kowal-Bielecka OA, Pittrow D, Huscher D, et al, Validation of echocardiography (ECHO-DOPPLER) as an outcome measure in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis (PAH-SSc) – results of a systematic literature analysis. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology. EULAR, Paris, 11–14 June 2008.
  11. Distler O, Behrens F, Pittrow D, et al. Defining appropriate outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis: Delphi consensus study with cluster analysis. Arthritis Rheum Res (2008) 59:867–75.[CrossRef]
  12. Steen V, Medsger TA Jr. Predictors of isolated pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis and limited cutaneous involvement. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 48:516–22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Allanore Y, Borderie D, Meune C, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a diagnostic marker of early pulmonary artery hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis and effects of calcium-channel blockers. Arthritis Rheum (2003) 48:3503–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Allanore Y, Borderie D, Avouac J, et al. High N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide as independent predictors of the occurrence of precapillary pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum (2008) 58:284–91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Submitted 30 April 2008; Accepted 3 July 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Román, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Román, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?