Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2008 47(Supplement 5):v39-v41; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken308
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kowal-Bielecka, O.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kowal-Bielecka, O.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Rheumatology issue: Update in systemic sclerosis [View the issue table of contents]

Outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis

O. Kowal-Bielecka1, M. Delcroix2, A. Vonk-Noordegraaf3, M. M. Hoeper4 and R. Naeije5

1Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland, 2Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 4Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany and 5Department of Cardiology, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Correspondence to: R. Naeije, Department of Pathophysiology, Erasme Campus, CP 604, 808, Lennik road, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: rnaeije{at}ulb.ac.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
SSc is complicated in ~10% of the patients by pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a rare dyspnoea–fatigue syndrome caused by an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance. The prognosis of SSc-PAH is particularly poor, with estimated survival rates of ~50% at 2 yrs without pulmonary circulation-targeted therapies. Prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors have been shown to be efficacious in PAH, with persistent long-term benefit and approximate doubling of survival rate, and these encouraging results appear transposable to the SSc-PAH subcategory. However, PAH as well as SSc-PAH remain incurable, with insufficient functional improvement in many patients. More progress is needed, and this will require more effective drugs and adapted outcome measures.

KEY WORDS: Pulmonary arterial hypertension, Systemic sclerosis, Outcome measure, Exercise capacity


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare dyspnoea–fatigue syndrome caused by an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and eventual right ventricular failure [1]. The condition is either idiopathic (iPAH), or occurs in association with a variety of conditions including SSc (SSc-PAH). Screening strategies based on a combination of clinical suspicion, echocardiography and right heart catheterization allow for a diagnosis of PAH in up to 10% of the patients with SSc [2]. In spite of advances brought about during the last decade by the introduction of prostacyclins, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5is) [3], PAH remains incurable, with a median survival still limited to 5–6 yrs, which decreases to 2–3 yrs in SSc-PAH [4].


    Efficacy of PAH therapies
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new therapies in PAH have relied on exercise capacity measured by the distance walked in 6 min as a primary end-point. The logic of this approach is that the aerobic exercise capacity or maximum oxygen uptake in heart failure is predominantly determined by maximum cardiac output [5]. The symptomatology of PAH is explained by right ventricular failure caused by an increased PVR [6]. Because of the tight linear relationship between oxygen uptake and muscle work, which translates into maximum average running or walking speed, exercise capacity can be reliably estimated by a distance run or walked in 6 or 12 min as submaximal exercise tests [5, 6]. The 6-min walk distance (6MWD) is a simple, cheap, safe and reproducible measurement, which has been extensively used to assess the effects of drugs in PAH patients [5, 6]. The 6MWD has been shown to be well correlated to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, maximum oxygen uptake, PVR and survival [7] in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and iPAH and is sensitive to pharmacological interventions [8].

This reasoning has been questioned by a recent meta-analysis. The authors examined 10 RCTs of the ERAs bosentan and sitaxsentan and of the PDE5i sildenafil in a total of 613 patients with PAH, of whom 186 with SSc-PAH received the active treatment and 72 SSc-PAH received placebos [9]. The effect size, which is the ratio of the treatment effect (mean difference in treatment group minus mean difference in placebo group) to the pooled S.D. of these differences, was 0.31 for bosentan, 0.26 for sitaxsentan and 0.53 for sildenafil in SSc-PAH, while for the whole PAH population, these values were of 0.61, 0.33 and 0.58, respectively. By convention, effect sizes of <0.2 are usually considered trivial, 0.2–0.5 as small, 0.5–0.8 as moderate and >0.8–1.2 as important to very important [9]. Therefore, the study concluded that the 6MWD seemed to indicate a poor therapeutic response of SSc-PAH to currently used therapies in PAH patients. However, whether effect sizes for 6MWD are really different between PAH subcategories remains uncertain. Small effect sizes for the 6MWD may simply reflect the limited, but still clinically relevant, efficacy of available PAH therapies or it may, indeed, reflect lack of responsiveness to these therapies in SSc. On the other hand, PAH as a disease entity is described by more than just exercise capacity, and one could consider other measures of improvement based on signs and symptoms scores, the NYHA functional class, more extensive dyspnoea scores, echocardiographic or haemodynamic measurements and chemical biomarkers [10]. There may be in addition a need for more specific outcome measures and validation in SSc-PAH [11].


    How do outcome measures used in PAH apply to SSc-PAH?
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
RCTs of new therapies in PAH have included a majority of idiopathic PAH and a variable, though dominant minority of SSc-PAH patients [8]. Only one of the trials was specifically devoted to SSc-PAH [12]. We re-examined the changes in 6MWD and in other outcome variables reported in SSc-PAH (or extended to CTD-associated PAH) and compared them with those reported in PAH in general. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the 6MWD as primary end-point, and as secondary end-points NYHA functional class and PVR all changed directionally (although not usually statistically significantly) in SSc-PAH, CTD-PAH or global PAH, without suggestion of specificities.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. Mean/median effects of PAH therapies on the 6MWD (A), NYHA/WHO functional class (B) and PVR (C) in the pivotal randomized trials [3, 8] for which data on SSc or CTD subgroups could be retrieved. All data, except those for ambrisentan in a general PAH population, represent placebo-corrected mean/median treatment effects. For ambrisentan in general, PAH population mean improvements from baseline are given. Epo, intravenous epoprostenol; Trepr, subcutaneous treprostinil; Bos, bosentan; Sitax, sitaxsentan; Ambri, ambrisentan. The numbers given next to names of medications correspond to daily dose in milligrams.

 
There are of course important methodological limitations to this analysis. Secondary end-points are only exploratory, and repetition of a posteriori analysis of subgroups is challenging because of rapidly increasing risk of false-positive and -negative results [13]. Even more difficult is the assessment of long-term effects of drugs shown efficacious in short-term RCT, where one remains limited to registries with associated suboptimal levels of evidence. It is nevertheless remarkable that a recent 6-yr longitudinal, single-centre study of 92 patients with SSc-PAH reported an improved 2-yr survival from 47% (historical controls) to 71% with the introduction of efficacious oral therapies for PAH [14].


    Future studies
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
There is an on-going debate as to whether the 6MWD is the ideal primary end-point in PAH, especially in SSc-PAH. While there has been no study specifically aimed at the determination of the minimal change in 6MWD clinically meaningful in PAH, the presence of systemic disease would be expected to decrease the sensitivity of the measure. In patients with COPD, in whom exercise capacity limitation is multifactorial, the minimal-change 6MWD perceived by the patients as being clinically meaningful is ~54 m [15]. However, in PAH including SSc-PAH, a mean change in 6MWD of 8 m was reported to be associated with significant changes in dyspnoea–fatigue rating and clinical scores after only 6 weeks of subcutaneous treprostinil therapy [16].

Alternative end-points are being investigated and actively built into trials [10, 11]. Time to deterioration is an interesting alternative to the 6MWD as it measures clinical stability, which is a desirable result to achieve in the less severely ill patients. Chemical biomarkers are being closely examined. Whether more specific end-points are to be considered when PAH is associated with SSc is a challenging question, which will be answered only with properly designed RCTs using new expert consensus-derived outcome measures.

Formula


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Supplement: This paper forms part of the supplement entitled ‘Update in systemic sclerosis’. This supplement was supported by an unrestricted grant from Encysive.

Disclosure statement: M.M.H. has received fees for speaking at conferences and is a consultant for Actelion, Encysive, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer and Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Efficacy of PAH therapies
 How do outcome measures...
 Future studies
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Farber HW, Loscalzo J. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med (2004) 351:1655–65.[Free Full Text]
  2. Hachulla E, Gressin V, Guillevin L, et al. Early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: a French nationwide prospective multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum (2005) 52:792–800.
  3. Naeije R, Huez S. Expert opinion on available options treating pulmonary arterial hypertension. Exp Opin Pharmacother (2007) 8:2247–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. McLaughlin V, Presberg KW, Doyle RL, et al. Prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension* ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest (2004) 126:78S–92S.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Fleg JL, Pina IL, Balady GJ. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research applications: an advisory from the committee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention, council on clinical cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation (2000) 102:1591–7.[Free Full Text]
  6. Naeije R, Huez S. Right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension: physiological concepts. Eur Heart J (2007) 9H:17S–21S.
  7. Miyamoto S, Nagaya N, Satoh T, et al. Clinical correlates and prognostic significance of six-minute walk test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2000) 161:487–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Galiè N, Seeger W, Naeije R, Simonneau G, Rubin LJ. Comparative analysis of clinical trials and evidence-based treatment algorithm in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43:81S–8S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Avouac J, Wipff J, Kahan A, Allanore Y. Effects of oral treatments on exercise capacity in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis (2008) 67:808–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Peacock AJ, Naeije R, Galie N, Reeves JT. End points in pulmonary arterial hypertension: the way forward. Eur Respir J (2004) 23:947–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Distler O, Behrens F, Huscher D, et al. Need for improved outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (2006) 45:1455–7.[Free Full Text]
  12. Badesch DB, Tapson VF, McGoon MD, et al. Continuous intravenous epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension due to the scleroderma spectrum of diseases. Ann Intern Med (2000) 132:425–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lagakos SW. The challenge of subgroup analyses—reporting without distorting. N Engl J Med (2006) 355:1667–9.
  14. Williams MH, Das C, Handler CE, et al. Systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary hypertension: improved survival in the current era. Heart (2006) 92:926–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Redelmeyer DA, Bayoumi AM, Goldstein RS, Guyatt GH. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the six minute walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (1997) 155:1278–82.[Abstract]
  16. Simonneau G, Barst RJ, Galie N, et al. Continuous subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2002) 162:800–4.
Submitted 1 May 2008; Accepted 3 July 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kowal-Bielecka, O.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kowal-Bielecka, O.
Right arrow Articles by Naeije, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Systemic Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?