Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JESSOP, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by BRIGHT, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JESSOP, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by BRIGHT, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1974 British Society for Rheumatology


review-article

EOSINOPHILIA DURING GOLD THERAPY*

J. D. JESSOP, J. DIPPY, A. TURNBULL and M. BRIGHT

Department of Rheumatology, University of Wales Heath Park, Cardiff
Department of Rheumatology and Medical Unit, The London Hospital Whitechapel, London E1 1BB

The clinical significance of eosinophilia occurring during treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with sodium aurothiomalate (Myocrisin) has been evaluated. Analysis of differential white cell counts during the first gramme of Myocrisin showed that eosinophil counts in excess of 400/c.mm. occurred at some time in 47% of the 95 patients receiving gold. The earliest onset of eosinophilia was observed after 30 mg. of Myocrisin had been given, and the highest count reached 9,032/c.mm. Eosinophilia was present in 44% of patients with side-effects and in 50% with no adverse reactions. When eosinophilia was associated with toxicity it preceded the reaction in 70% of patients. The degree of eosinophilia did not correlate with the severity of the toxic reaction, but patients with eosinophil counts of 2,000/c.mm. had a high incidence of toxic reactions. The results suggest that routine differential white cell counts are unlikely to be helpfulduring chrysotherapy, but that blood films should be examined and a count made if eosinophilia is suspected, as this may provide warning of impending toxicity. Eosinophil counts in excess of 2,000/c.mm. should be considered a contraindication to further gold.

*Paper read at a combined meeting of the British Association for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation with the Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Cardiff, September 1973.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.