Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GEENEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by BIJLSMA, J. W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GEENEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by BIJLSMA, J. W. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 British Society for Rheumatology

research-article

STABILITY OF HEALTH STATUS MEASUREMENT IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

R. GEENEN*,{dagger},, J. W. G. JACOBS*, G. GODAERT{dagger}, F. W. KRAAIMAAT{ddagger}, M. R. BRONS*, A. van der HEIDE*,§ and J. W. J. BIJLSMA*

*Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands
{dagger}Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Utrecht The Netherlands
{ddagger}Department of Medical Psychology, University of Nijmegen The Netherlands
§Arthritis Research Foundation Utrecht (SRU) The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: R. Geenen, Department of Rheumatology F.02.223, University Hospital Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis that have been extensively validated for use in clinical trials are generally used also in correlative studies, e.g. to predict future health status. This application requires stability (repeatability of measurements). The purpose of our study was to determine the stability of commonly used health status measures. Two measurements at an interval of 6 months were taken in 99 patients. High stability ({alpha} = 0.78 to 0.94) was observed for five biomedical measures (grip strength, walking time, platelet count, haemoglobin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and five self-report measures (mobility, self care, impact daily activities, anxiety and cheerful mood). Moderate stability ({alpha} = 0.65 to 0.72) was observed for joint scores, pain, C-reactive protein and depressive mood. The highly stable measures most adequately reflect individual differences, may be applied most reliably in correlative studies and appear to have the largest clinical utility with regard to long-term prediction of health status.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Stability, Reliability, Validity, Outcome measures, Clinimetrics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.