© 1996 British Society for Rheumatology
other |
ARE WE MAKING THE MOST OF THE STANFORD HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE?
*North Yorkshire Health York
Rheumatology & Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds York
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: A. Tennant, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ.
For many years, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) has provided an effective measure of disabihty. Recently, some debate has emerged about whether or not the HAQ is an ‘ordinal’ or ‘interval’ scale. The opportunity to test its level of measurement arose when the scale was applied in a community survey which undertook a two-stage random sample using postal questionnaires to ascertain the health care needs of those with arthritis. The HAQ data are fitted to the Rasch model which tests for the presence of certain desirable characteristics of measurement, e.g. unidimensionality. The fit of the data to the model for those self-reporting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was adequate. The transformed HAQ score, derived from the Rasch analysis, is compared with the ordinary HAQ (raw) score. This shows that, for those with RA, incremental units of the raw score at the margins of the scale reflect an increasing level of (dis)ability compared to similar units in the centre of the scale. Thus, the traditional HAQ score (range 0–3) is an ordinal score. The findings also indicate that scoring all 20 items may lead to greater sensitivity. Questions are also raised about the construct validity for those with other types of arthritis. For osteoarthrosis, the grip item does not appear to belong to the same underlying construct as the other items.
KEY WORDS: Disability outcome, Rasch, HAQ, Rheumatoid arthritis
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Durez, V. Fraselle, F. Houssiau, J.-L. Thonnard, H. Nielens, and M. Penta Validation of the ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2007; 66(8): 1098 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P J Mease, C E Antoni, D D Gladman, and W J Taylor Psoriatic arthritis assessment tools in clinical trials Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2005; 64(suppl_2): ii49 - ii54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. A. Marra, L. D. Lynd, J. M. Esdaile, J. Kopec, and A. H. Anis The impact of low family income on self-reported health outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within a publicly funded health-care environment Rheumatology, November 1, 2004; 43(11): 1390 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Langley, D. S. Memel, J. R. Kirwan, J. Pollock, S. Hewlett, D. Gubbay, and J. Powell Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire and welfare benefits advice to help people disabled through arthritis to access financial support Rheumatology, July 1, 2004; 43(7): 863 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kalke, D. Mukerjee, and B. Dasgupta A study of the Health Assessment Questionnaire to evaluate functional status in polymyalgia rheumatica Rheumatology, August 1, 2000; 39(8): 883 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Wolfe and S. X Kong Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 1999; 58(9): 563 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|