Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verhoeven, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verhoeven, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 37, 1102-1109, Copyright © 1998 by British Society for Rheumatology


ORIGINAL PAPERS

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: randomized comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone. COBRA Trial Group. Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis

AC Verhoeven, JC Bibo, M Boers, GL Engel and S van der Linden
Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Maastricht University Hospital, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of early intervention in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, with combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine, compared to sulphasalazine alone. METHODS: Multicentre 56 week randomized double- blind trial with full economic analysis of direct costs and utility analysis with rating scale and standard gamble measurement techniques. RESULTS: The combined-treatment group included 76 patients and the sulphasalazine group 78 patients. The mean total costs per patient in the first 56 weeks of follow-up were $5519 for combined treatment and $6511 for treatment with sulphasalazine alone (P = 0.37). Out-patient care, in-patient care and non-health care each contributed about one- third to the total costs. The combined-treatment group appeared to generate savings in the length of hospital stay for RA, non-protocol drugs and costs of home help, but comparisons were not statistically significant. Protocol drugs and monitoring were slightly more expensive in the combined-treatment group. Clinical, radiographic and functional outcomes significantly favoured combined treatment at week 28 (radiography also at week 56). Utility scores also favoured combined treatment. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment is cost-effective due to enhanced efficacy at lower or equal direct costs.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. H. D. van Tuyl, A. M. C. Plass, W. F. Lems, A. E. Voskuyl, P. J. S. M. Kerstens, B. A. C. Dijkmans, and M. Boers
Discordant perspectives of rheumatologists and patients on COBRA combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology, August 18, 2008; (2008) ken323v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
L. H D van Tuyl, A. M. C Plass, W. F Lems, A. E Voskuyl, B. A C Dijkmans, and M. Boers
Why are Dutch rheumatologists reluctant to use the COBRA treatment strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis?
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2007; 66(7): 974 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Brennan, N. Bansback, A. Reynolds, and P. Conway
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of etanercept in adults with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK
Rheumatology, January 1, 2004; 43(1): 62 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A Boonen, D van der Heijde, R Landewe, F Guillemin, M Rutten-van Molken, M Dougados, H Mielants, K de Vlam, H van der Tempel, S Boesen, et al.
Direct costs of ankylosing spondylitis and its determinants: an analysis among three European countries
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2003; 62(8): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S E Gabriel, P Tugwell, and M Drummond
Progress towards an OMERACT-ILAR guideline for economic evaluations in rheumatology
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2002; 61(4): 370 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. A. Quinn, P. G. Conaghan, and P. Emery
The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence?
Rheumatology, November 1, 2001; 40(11): 1211 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. M. Lambert
Medical therapy for rheumatoid arthritis--value for money?
Rheumatology, September 1, 2001; 40(9): 961 - 964.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A C Verhoeven, M Boers, and S van der Linden
Responsiveness of the core set, response criteria, and utilities in early rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2000; 59(12): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. S. El-Gabalawy, P. Duray, and R. Goldbach-Mansky
Evaluating Patients With Arthritis of Recent Onset: Studies in Pathogenesis and Prognosis
JAMA, November 8, 2000; 284(18): 2368 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.