Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Black, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Black, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, H. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Rheumatology, Vol 37, 952-960, Copyright © 1998 by British Society for Rheumatology


ORIGINAL PAPERS

Oral iloprost in Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a multicentre, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study

CM Black, L Halkier-Sorensen, JJ Belch, S Ullman, R Madhok, AJ Smit, JD Banga and HR Watson
Royal Free Hospital, London.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal dose of oral iloprost on the basis of efficacy and tolerability in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomized, parallel-group comparison of two different doses of oral iloprost and placebo. SETTING: European university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 103 patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. INTERVENTION: Patients received one of three treatments for 6 weeks: placebo, oral iloprost 50 microg or oral iloprost 100 microg. Each treatment was taken twice daily, giving total daily doses of iloprost of 100 and 200 microg. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency, total daily duration and severity of Raynaud's attacks were recorded in a specially designed patient diary; physician's global assessment and adverse events were recorded at visits to the clinic. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were recruited, 89 completed the assessments throughout the treatment period and 82 completed an additional 6 weeks of follow-up after treatment. Thirty-five patients received placebo, 33 received iloprost 50 microg and 35 received iloprost 100 microg. The mean percentage reductions in the frequency, total daily duration and severity of Raynaud's attacks were numerically greater in the iloprost groups at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up. At the end of treatment (6 weeks), there were significant treatment differences in the total daily duration of attacks (P = 0.03), but not in the severity (P = 0.07) or the frequency of attacks (P = 0.37). At the end of follow-up (12 weeks), there were significant treatment differences in the total daily duration of attacks (P = 0.001) and in the severity of attacks (P = 0.007), but not in the frequency of attacks (P = 0.07). Percentages of patients improved at the end of treatment as assessed by the physician were 44% placebo, 57% iloprost 50 microg and 64% iloprost 100 microg (not significant). Side-effects were reported by 80% of patients on placebo, 85% on oral iloprost 50 microg and 97% on oral iloprost 100 microg. Premature discontinuations of treatment in each group were 9, 30 and 51%, respectively, with 6, 27 and 51% being due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The results on the daily duration of Raynaud's attacks suggest that both 50 and 100 microg oral iloprost twice daily may be effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. The 50 microg iloprost dose was better tolerated in this patient group.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
O Kowal-Bielecka, R Landewe, J Avouac, S Chwiesko, I Miniati, L Czirjak, P Clements, C Denton, D Farge, K Fligelstone, et al.
EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR)
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2009; 68(5): 620 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
M E Hettema, D Zhang, H Bootsma, and C G M Kallenberg
Bosentan therapy for patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1398 - 1399.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. Caglayan, M. Huntgeburth, T. Karasch, J. Weihrauch, N. Hunzelmann, T. Krieg, E. Erdmann, and S. Rosenkranz
Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibition Is a Novel Therapeutic Option in Raynaud Disease
Arch Intern Med, January 23, 2006; 166(2): 231 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
J. A. Whitsett, C. J. Bachurski, K. C. Barnes, P. A. Bunn Jr., L. M. Case, D. N. Cook, D. Crooks, M. W. Duncan, L. Dwyer-Nield, R. C. Elston, et al.
Functional Genomics of Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., August 1, 2004; 31(2/S1): S1 - S81.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. G. Pronk, J. P. Baars, P. Chr. de Jong, and A. M. Westermann
Some Unusual Paraneoplastic Syndromes: CASE 2. DIGITAL ULCERATION AS A PARANEOPLASTIC SYNDROME IN OVARIAN CANCER
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2003; 21(13): 2620 - 2622.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. Maddison
Prevention of vascular damage in scleroderma with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition
Rheumatology, September 1, 2002; 41(9): 965 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
A. N. Sapadin and R. Fleischmajer
Treatment of Scleroderma
Arch Dermatol, January 1, 2002; 138(1): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
O. Liangos, L. Neure, U. Kuhl, M. Pauschinger, J. Sieper, A. Distler, P. L. Schwimmbeck, and J. Braun
The possible role of myocardial biopsy in systemic sclerosis
Rheumatology, June 1, 2000; 39(6): 674 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.