Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijde, D.
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijde, D.
Right arrow Articles by van der Linden, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 1999; 38: 1213-1220
© 1999 British Society for Rheumatology

Reading radiographs in chronological order, in pairs or as single films has important implications for the discriminative power of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials

D. van der Heijde, A. Boonen, M. Boers2, P. Kostense1 and S. van der Linden

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht and
1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: D. van der Heijde, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Objective. To determine the influence of reading series of films in chronological order, in pairs with unknown time sequence, or as single films, on precision and sensitivity to change.

Methods. Two studies were performed with 10 and 12 patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria. In Study 1, two sets of films with a 1 yr interval were scored in chronological order, in pairs, and as single films. In Study 2, four sets of films, with a 1 yr interval each, were scored in chronological order, as single films and as single-pair (right and left together). All films were scored with the Sharp/van der Heijde method by two independent observers. Data were analysed with a repeated measures ANOVA using a full mixed effects model. Two generalizability (G) coefficients were constructed for reliability and for change.

Results. Study 1: the interobserver reliability was similar for the three methods (Greliability chronological 0.94, paired 0.88, single 0.93); progression was a mean increase (averaged over patients, observers and methods) from 26 to 37 (P=0.046). The sensitivity for change was greater for the chronological than for the paired and single scoring (Gchange 0.39, 0.22 and 0.24, respectively). Study 2: the interobserver reliability was 0.86 for chronological, 0.76 for single-pair and 0.91 for single readings. Significantly more progression was measured with the chronological compared with the single-paired and single methods (15.9 vs 8.5 and 8.3; P=0.0001). A constant progression was suggested by chronological reading, in contrast to a stabilization in the other two methods after 1 yr.

Conclusion. Reading films in chronological order is most sensitive to change in a time period up to 3 yr follow-up; this was already present after 1 yr, but even more pronounced with longer follow-up.

KEY WORDS: Radiographs, Reading order, Paired/single films, Rheumatoid arthritis, Clinical trials

2 Present address: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VU University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P A Ory
Interpreting radiographic data in rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2003; 62(7): 597 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E Lindqvist, K Jonsson, T Saxne, and K Eberhardt
Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2003; 62(7): 611 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
A A den Broeder, L A B Joosten, T Saxne, D Heinegard, H Fenner, A M M Miltenburg, W L H Frasa, L J van Tits, W A Buurman, P L C M van Riel, et al.
Long term anti-tumour necrosis factor {alpha} monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: effect on radiological course and prognostic value of markers of cartilage turnover and endothelial activation
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2002; 61(4): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. A. van Everdingen, J. W.G. Jacobs, D. R. Siewertsz van Reesema, and J. W.J. Bijlsma
Low-Dose Prednisone Therapy for Patients with Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Efficacy, Disease-Modifying Properties, and Side Effects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Ann Intern Med, January 1, 2002; 136(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
S Boini and F Guillemin
Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages
Ann Rheum Dis, September 1, 2001; 60(9): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
G.-R. Auleley, B. Giraudeau, M. Dougados, and P. Ravaud
Radiographic assessment of hip osteoarthritis progression: impact of reading procedures for longitudinal studies
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2000; 59(6): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.