Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radstake, T. R. D. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Riel, P. L. C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radstake, T. R. D. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Riel, P. L. C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2000; 39: 267-273
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology

Familial vs sporadic rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A prospective study in an early RA inception cohort

T. R. D. J. Radstake, P. Barrera, J. M. C. Albers, H. L. Swinkels, L. B. A. van de Putte and P. L. C. M. van Riel

Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Objectives. To study potential differences in demographic, process and outcome variables between familial and sporadic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an early RA inception cohort.

Methods. In 1998, we ascertained the familial status of all collaborative patients in a large early RA inception cohort at our department. Familial RA was defined by the presence of at least two siblings fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA. Baseline demographic data and prospectively recorded disease activity variables, therapies and radiological damage during the first 6 yr of disease were included in the analysis. A regression analysis was performed to assess whether familial clustering is a prognostic factor.

Results. We identified 142 patients with sporadic and 36 with familial RA. The most striking difference between these groups was the larger sibship size in multicase families (8.2 ± 2.5 vs 5.5 ± 2.8; P < 0.0001). Age at onset was similar in both groups, although males with familiar RA were younger at disease onset than those with sporadic RA (median 50 vs 57 yr; P=0.03). No differences were found in gender, presence of rheumatoid factor (RF), antinuclear factor and HLA-DR typing or in disease activity, interventions and outcome over 6 yr of follow-up. Early radiological damage and disease activity, but not familial history of RA were prognostic for X-ray damage.

Conclusion. We show that sibship size is the only relevant risk factor for familial RA. No differences in genotypic and phenotypic characteristics, disease severity or radiological damage were observed among familial and sporadic RA. Familial history of RA is not a poor prognostic factor. This prospective study confirms previous cross-sectional findings in the Dutch population.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Familial aggregation, Early RA inception cohort.

Correspondence to: P. Barrera, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Hutchinson, M. P. Lynch, R. J. Moots, R. N. Thompson, E. Williams, T. R. D. J. Radstake, and P. Barrera
The influence of current cigarette smoking on the age of onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in individuals with sporadic and familial RA
Rheumatology, September 1, 2001; 40(9): 1068 - 1070.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.