Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehtinen, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kauppi, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lehtinen, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kauppi, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2000; 39: 288-292
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology

Radiographic joint space in rheumatoid glenohumeral joints. A 15-year prospective follow-up study in 74 patients

J. T. Lehtinen, M. U. K. Lehto, K. Kaarela, H. J. Kautiainen, E. A. Belt and M. J. Kauppi

Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, FIN-18120 Heinola, Finland

Objective. To evaluate radiographically the glenohumeral (GH) joint space in patients with long-term rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. A cohort of 74 patients with RA were followed prospectively for 15 yr. At the end point, 148 shoulders were radiographed using a standard method. The GH joint space was examined from the radiographs using a method developed previously for population studies; the joint space was measured at three different sites and the average of the three measurements, the integral space, was calculated. Destruction of the GH joints was assessed with the Larsen method on a scale of 0–5 and compared with the joint space measurements.

Results. The mean GH joint space in RA patients was 3.1 (S.D. 3.3), range -17.3 to 5.7 mm; 2.7 mm (S.D. 4.5) in men and 3.2 mm (S.D. 2.8) in women. The mean of the affected joints (Larsen grades 2–5), 1.7 mm (S.D. 4.5), was notably narrower than the mean 4.4 mm (S.D. 0.6) of the non-affected (Larsen grades 0–1) joints. Pathological GH joint space, less than 2 mm, was found in five (15%) of 36 joints in men and in 14 (13%) of 112 joints in women. All the joints graded as Larsen 4 and 5 (n = 17) fulfilled this pathological criterion. Joint space narrowing was associated [r = - 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.56 to -0.75] with increasing destruction (Larsen grading) of the joint. The narrowing was significant between non- (Larsen 0, 1), moderately (Larsen 2, 3) and severely (Larsen 4, 5) affected joints (P < 0.001). However, a remarkable step in this process occurred between Larsen grades 3 and 4 when the mean joint space diminished from 3.1 to 0.3 mm.

Conclusions. Joint space narrowing is a frequent consequence of GH joint rheumatoid affection. However, joint space narrowing is a late phenomenon occurring not until after marked erosive destruction, which should be noted when using the Larsen method for GH joints.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Glenohumeral joint, Joint space, Radiography, Larsen method.

Correspondence to: M. J. Kauppi.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
O. J. Sommer, A. Kladosek, V. Weiler, H. Czembirek, M. Boeck, and M. Stiskal
Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Practical Guide to State-of-the-Art Imaging, Image Interpretation, and Clinical Implications
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 381 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
J. T. Lehtinen, K. Kaarela, E. A. Belt, M. J. Kauppi, E. Skytta, P. P. Kuusela, H. J. Kautiainen, and M. U. K. Lehto
Radiographic joint space in rheumatoid elbow joints. A 15-year prospective follow-up study in 74 patients
Rheumatology, October 1, 2001; 40(10): 1141 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.