Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kay, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hay, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kay, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hay, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2000; 39: 800-803
© 2000 British Society for Rheumatology


Report

Undergraduate rheumatology teaching in the UK: a survey of current practice and changes since 1990

L. J. Kay, C. M. Deighton1, D. J. Walker and E. M. Hay2 on behalf of the Arthritis Research Campaign Undergraduate Working Party of the ARC Education Sub-committee

Musculoskeletal Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne,
1 Department of Rheumatology, City Hospital, Nottingham,
2 Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, The Haywood, Stoke on Trent, UK

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Introduction
 
Undergraduate medical teaching is important in a number of respects: it lays the foundation for future practice, skills and attitudes, forms a basis for lifelong learning and in some cases the quality of undergraduate teaching may determine career choices later in life [1]. Medical undergraduate teaching in the UK was reviewed extensively in 1993 and far-reaching recommendations were made in the General Medical Council (GMC) document Tomorrow's doctors[2]. These recommendations particularly focused on training in clinical skills and emphasized the importance of integration both vertically with the basic sciences and horizontally with other specialty areas. There was also an increased emphasis on social and psychological aspects of disease and disability, and a primary care viewpoint. Similar recommendations about rheumatology undergraduate education were made by a working party representing the UK rheumatology education bodies, the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) and the Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Methods
 

    Results
 
Exposure to rheumatology teaching
Setting and timing of teaching
Rheumatology teaching contact time
Teaching methods and materials
Assessment
Curriculum changes since 1990
The role of the ARC

    Conclusions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Jandial, T. Rapley, and H. Foster
Current teaching of paediatric musculoskeletal medicine within UK medical schools--a need for change
Rheumatology, May 1, 2009; 48(5): 587 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. Foster and A. V. Ramanan
'The eyes have it!' The need to improve awareness and access to early ophthalmological screening for juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis
Rheumatology, April 1, 2009; 48(4): 330 - 331.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. Hewlett, B. Clarke, A. O'Brien, A. Hammond, S. Ryan, L. Kay, P. Richards, and C. Almeida
Rheumatology education for undergraduate nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students in the UK: standards, challenges and solutions
Rheumatology, July 1, 2008; 47(7): 1025 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Almeida, B. Clarke, A. O'Brien, A. Hammond, S. Ryan, L. Kay, and S. Hewlett
Current provision of rheumatology education for undergraduate nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students in the UK
Rheumatology, July 1, 2006; 45(7): 868 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. E. Foster, S. Everett, and A. Myers
Rheumatology training in the UK: the trainees' perspective
Rheumatology, February 1, 2005; 44(2): 263 - 264.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. Goh, A. Samanta, S. Cavendish, and D. Heney
Rheumatology curriculum: passport to the future successful handling of the musculoskeletal burden?
Rheumatology, December 1, 2004; 43(12): 1468 - 1472.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. Myers, J. E. McDonagh, K. Gupta, R. Hull, D. Barker, L. J. Kay, and H. E. Foster
More 'cries from the joints': assessment of the musculoskeletal system is poorly documented in routine paediatric clerking
Rheumatology, August 1, 2004; 43(8): 1045 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Coady, D. Walker, and L. Kay
Regional Examination of the Musculoskeletal System (REMS): a core set of clinical skills for medical students
Rheumatology, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 633 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
L. J. Kay, G. Baggott, D. A. Coady, and H. E. Foster
Musculoskeletal examination for children and adolescents: do standard textbooks contain enough information?
Rheumatology, November 1, 2003; 42(11): 1423 - 1425.
[Full Text] [PDF]