Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 1295-1302
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Disease-specific, patient-assessed measures of health outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness

K. L. Haywood1,2,, A. M. Garratt3, K. Jordan4, K. Dziedzic5 and P. T. Dawes6

1 Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, York YO1 5DD,
2 Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health, Physiotherapy and Dietetics Subject Group, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB,
3 Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF,
4 Primary Care Sciences Research Centre,
5 Department of Physiotherapy Studies and Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG and
6 Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST6 7AG, UK

Objective. To assess the acceptability and measurement properties of four ankylosing spondylitis (AS)-specific, patient-assessed measures of health outcome: AS Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL), Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Body Chart and the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ).

Methods. Instruments were administered by means of a self-completed questionnaire to patients recruited from across the United Kingdom (UK). Instruments were assessed for data quality and scaling assumptions. Where appropriate, dimensionality was assessed using principle component analysis (PCA). Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed in those patients reporting no change in AS-specific health at 2 weeks. The convergent validity of the instruments was assessed and scores were correlated with responses to the health transition questions. Responsiveness was assessed for patients reporting change in health at 6 months.

Results. The BASDAI and Body Chart have low self-completion rates. Item responses for the RLDQ were skewed towards higher levels of functional ability. PCA supported instrument unidimensionality. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.87 (BASDAI) to 0.93 (RLDQ). Test–retest reliability estimates support the use of the ASQoL and RLDQ in individual evaluation (>0.90). Correlations between instruments were in the hypothesized direction; the largest was between the ASQoL and BASDAI (0.79). The BASDAI had the strongest linear relationship, with responses to both specific and general health transition questions (P<0.01). With the exception of the Body Chart, instruments had a stronger relationship with general health transition. The BASDAI was the most responsive instrument. The Body Chart and RLDQ had low levels of responsiveness.

Conclusion. The instruments have undergone a comprehensive comparative evaluation to assess the measurement properties required for patient-assessed measures of health outcome. Adequate levels of reliability and validity were found for all instruments. The BASDAI and the ASQoL were the most responsive to self-perceived change in health, but the BASDAI had low levels of self-completion.

KEY WORDS: Ankylosing spondylitis, Patient-assessed health outcome, Reliability, Responsiveness, Validity.

Correspondence to: K. Haywood, Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health, Physiotherapy and Dietetics Subject Group, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. L. Haywood, A. M. Garratt, and P. T. Dawes
Patient-assessed health in ankylosing spondylitis: a structured review
Rheumatology, May 1, 2005; 44(5): 577 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
E. Lubrano, P. Sarzi Puttini, W. J. Parsons, S. D'Angelo, M. A. Cimmino, F. Serino, and N. Pappone
Validity and reliability of an Italian version of the revised Leeds disability questionnaire for patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Rheumatology, May 1, 2005; 44(5): 666 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. L. Haywood, A. M. Garratt, K. Jordan, K. Dziedzic, and P. T. Dawes
Spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness
Rheumatology, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.