Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haywood, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawes, P. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spondylarthropathies
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 1380-1387
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness

K. L. Haywood1,2,, A. M. Garratt3, K. Dziedzic4 and P. T. Dawes5

1 Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, York YO1 5DD,
2 Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health, Physiotherapy and Dietetics Subject Group, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB,
3 Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF,
4 Department of Physiotherapy Studies and Primary Care Sciences Research Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG and
5 Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST6 7AG, UK

Objective. To assess the acceptability and measurement properties of two generic measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL): the EuroQol and the Short Form 12-item Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods. Instruments were administered by means of a self-completed questionnaire to AS patients recruited from across the United Kingdom. Instruments were assessed for data quality and scaling assumptions. Test–retest reliability was assessed in those patients reporting no change in general health at 2 weeks. The convergent validity of both instruments was assessed and scores were correlated with responses to health transition questions. Responsiveness was assessed for patients reporting change in health at 6 months.

Results. The instruments had high completion rates. Although slightly skewed towards better levels of health, scores covered the available range for both sections of the EuroQol [EQ-5D and EQ-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)]. Score distributions approximated normality for the SF-12. Test–retest reliability estimates support the use of both instruments in group evaluation and the SF-12 Physical Component Summary score (PCS) in individual evaluation (>0.90). Correlations between instruments were in the hypothesized direction and were of a moderate level. The EQ-VAS had the strongest linear relationship, with responses to both specific and general health transition questions (P<0.01). The EQ-VAS and SF-12 PCS were the most responsive instruments. The EQ-5D was the least responsive instrument.

Conclusion. The instruments have undergone a comprehensive comparative evaluation to assess the measurement properties required for patient-assessed measures of health outcome in AS. Adequate levels of acceptability, reliability and validity were found for both instruments. Although evidence supporting instrument responsiveness was strong for the EQ-VAS and SF-12 PCS, it was very weak for the EQ-5D and SF-12 Mental Component Summary Scale (MCS). The EQ-VAS and SF-12 PCS can both be recommended for use in group evaluation, and the SF-12 PCS is recommended in routine practice or research. However, the lower reliability of the SF-12 MCS and the limited ability of both the EQ-5D and SF-12 MCS to detect change in health may restrict these roles.

KEY WORDS: Ankylosing spondylitis, Generic instruments, Patient-assessed health outcome, Reliability, Responsiveness, Validity.

Correspondence to: K. Haywood, Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Health, Physiotherapy and Dietetics Subject Group, School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
A. BOONEN, M. van BERKEL, A. CIEZA, G. STUCKI, and D. van der HEIJDE
Which Aspects of Functioning Are Relevant for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Results of Focus Group Interviews
J Rheumatol, November 1, 2009; 36(11): 2501 - 2511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
A. Jerant, M. Moore-Hill, and P. Franks
Home-Based, Peer-Led Chronic Illness Self-Management Training: Findings From a 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2009; 7(4): 319 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of RheumatologyHome page
J. A. SINGH and V. STRAND
Spondyloarthritis Is Associated with Poor Function and Physical Health-Related Quality of Life
J Rheumatol, May 1, 2009; 36(5): 1012 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Rojas-Vargas, E. Munoz-Gomariz, A. Escudero, P. Font, P. Zarco, R. Almodovar, J. Gratacos, J. Mulero, X. Juanola, C. Montilla, et al.
First signs and symptoms of spondyloarthritis--data from an inception cohort with a disease course of two years or less (REGISPONSER-Early)
Rheumatology, April 1, 2009; 48(4): 404 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. L. Haywood, A. M. Garratt, K. Jordan, K. Dziedzic, and P. T. Dawes
Spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness
Rheumatology, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.