Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolhead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dieppe, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolhead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dieppe, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2002; 41: 390-394
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology


Original Papers

Who should have priority for a knee joint replacement?

G. M. Woolhead, J. L. Donovan1, J. A. Chard and P. A. Dieppe

Medical Research Council Health Services Research Collaboration and
1 Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK

Objectives. To explore patients' views on who should have priority for total knee replacement (TKR).

Methods. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with 25 patients on the waiting list for a TKR.

Results. All participants were willing to comment on waiting lists and prioritization for TKR. Two major themes emerged: what they thought should happen, and what they thought did happen. They thought that priority should be based on length and degree of suffering, pain severity, immobility, paid employment, payment of National Insurance contributions, and caring for dependants. In contrast, they thought that what actually happened depended on age and weight, excessive complaining and access to private practice.

Conclusions. The participants agreed with health professionals that pain and disability should be key criteria on which to prioritize people for a TKR. However, they also argued for a fair decision-making process that also included additional factors specific to the patient's circumstances. Criteria to aid prioritization for joint surgery need to accommodate the views of patients as well as professionals.

KEY WORDS: Osteoarthritis, Priorities, Total knee replacement, Qualitative research.

Correspondence to: G. M. Woolhead.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
B. Conner-Spady, C. Sanmartin, G. Johnston, J. McGurran, M. Kehler, and T. Noseworthy
'There are too many of us to fix.' Patients' views of acceptable waiting times for hip and knee replacement
J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2009; 14(4): 212 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
G. J. Treharne, A. C. Lyons, E. D. Hale, K. M. J. Douglas, and G. D. Kitas
'Compliance' is futile but is 'concordance' between rheumatology patients and health professionals attainable?
Rheumatology, January 1, 2006; 45(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
O Bruyere, F Richy, and J-Y Reginster
Three year joint space narrowing predicts long term incidence of knee surgery in patients with osteoarthritis: an eight year prospective follow up study
Ann Rheum Dis, December 1, 2005; 64(12): 1727 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P F K Yong, P C Milner, J N Payne, P A Lewis, and C Jennison
Inequalities in access to knee joint replacements for people in need
Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2004; 63(11): 1483 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
P. Juni, P. Dieppe, J. Donovan, T. Peters, J. Eachus, N. Pearson, R. Greenwood, and S. Frankel
Population requirement for primary knee replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study
Rheumatology, April 1, 2003; 42(4): 516 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.