Rheumatology 2002; 41: 945-946
© 2002 British Society for Rheumatology
Letters to the Editor |
Validity of the Disease Repercussion Profile
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia and
1 Imperial College London, London, UK
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
SIR, We read with interest the recent article by Taylor et al. [1] questioning the validity of the Disease Repercussion Profile (DRP). Research that aims to establish the construct validity of new instruments is clearly important. However, accurate identification of the constructs against which the new measure is to be compared is essential.
The DRP was developed to address a gap in the literature pertaining to the patient's perception of handicap. The World Health Organization distinguishes between the concepts of
Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand and
1 University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L Sharpe, F Denton, and L Schrieber Validity of the Disease Repercussion Profile in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, June 1, 2004; 13(6): 428 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
