Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/10/1207    most recent
keg359v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Verburg, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavelka, K.
Right arrow Articles by Verburg, K. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1207-1215
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Valdecoxib is as effective as diclofenac in the management of rheumatoid arthritis with a lower incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers: results of a 26-week trial

K. Pavelka, D. P. Recker1 and K. M. Verburg1

Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic and 1Pharmacia Corporation, Skokie, IL, USA.

Correspondence to: K. M. Verburg, Pharmacia Corporation, 5200 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077, USA. E-mail: jeffrey.d.kent{at}pharmacia.com

Objective. To compare the efficacy and upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety of valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg daily with those of diclofenac 75 mg slow release (SR) twice daily in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Seven hundred and twenty-two patients with adult-onset RA were enrolled into this 26-week, randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study (246 in the valdecoxib 20 mg daily arm, 237 in the valdecoxib 40 mg daily arm and 239 in the diclofenac 75 mg SR daily arm). Acetylsalicylic acid use (<=325 mg per day) was similar across all groups: 5.4% in the diclofenac group, 5.7% in the valdecoxib 20 mg group and 5.9% in the valdecoxib 40 mg group. Efficacy was measured by the Patient’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain [visual analogue scale (VAS)] and the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at baseline and at weeks 2, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 26 of treatment, or at early termination. Upper GI safety was evaluated by endoscopy at the end of treatment, which took place no more than 2 days after the last dose of study medication or at early termination.

Results. Valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg daily were comparable to diclofenac 75 mg SR twice daily in treating the signs and symptoms of RA. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to mean changes from baseline in the Patient’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS) or mHAQ. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving valdecoxib 20 mg daily (6%) and valdecoxib 40 mg daily (4%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in patients receiving diclofenac 75 mg SR twice daily (16%). Valdecoxib 20 mg daily was also associated with significantly improved GI tolerability (P = 0.035) compared with diclofenac.

Conclusions. Single daily doses of valdecoxib 20 and 40 mg provided efficacy comparable to that of diclofenac, with a superior upper GI safety profile in the long-term treatment of RA patients.

KEY WORDS: Valdecoxib, Diclofenac, Rheumatoid arthritis, Gastroduodenal ulcers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
P A Scott, G H Kingsley, C M Smith, E H Choy, and D L Scott
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and myocardial infarctions: comparative systematic review of evidence from observational studies and randomised controlled trials
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2007; 66(10): 1296 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
K. A. Binymin and K. Phillips
"To do no harm"
Rheumatology, February 1, 2007; 46(2): 368 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
Y Yazici and H Yazici
A survey of inclusion of the time element when reporting adverse effects in randomised controlled trials of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and tumour necrosis factor {alpha} inhibitors
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2007; 66(1): 124 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S. Chaiamnuay, J. J. Allison, and J. R. Curtis
Risks versus benefits of cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2006; 63(19): 1837 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.