Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on June 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/11/1317    most recent
keg374v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ding, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1317-1323
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity

C. Ding, F. Cicuttini1, F. Scott, M. Glisson1 and G. Jones

Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart and 1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University Medical School, Melbourne, Australia.

Correspondence to: G. Jones, Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, GPO Box 252–23, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia. E-mail: g.jones{at}utas.edu.au

Objective. To test the hypothesis that sex differences in knee cartilage volume may be mediated through body and bone size, age and/or physical activity.

Methods. A cross-sectional convenience sample of 372 subjects (males 43%; mean age 45 yr, range 26–61) was studied. Articular cartilage volumes and bone size were determined at the patella, medial and lateral tibia by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane using T1-weighted fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging. Height, weight, physical activity (lower limb muscle strength, endurance fitness and questionnaire items) and radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA) were measured.

Results. Gender explained 33–42% of the variation in knee cartilage volumes (all P < 0.001). Males had 33–42% higher cartilage volume than females at all sites. In the whole group, the magnitude of sex differences decreased to 8–18% after adjustment for body height, weight and bone size, but remained significant (all P < 0.05). Further adjustment for physical activity had no effect on the sex differences. The sex differences in cartilage volume were greater in those aged over 50 compared with those aged under 50 (P < 0.05 for age–sex interaction at all sites) and were independent of ROA.

Conclusions. Men have substantially higher knee cartilage volumes than women. These sex differences appear to be mediated in part by body and bone size but a significant amount remains unexplained. Furthermore, the differences become more marked over the age of 50 yr suggesting that both cartilage development and cartilage loss in later life contribute to sex differences in cartilage volume. Further longitudinal studies in large samples will be required to confirm these findings.

KEY WORDS: Knee, Cartilage, Volume, Sex, Age.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Ding, F. Cicuttini, L. Blizzard, F. Scott, and G. Jones
A longitudinal study of the effect of sex and age on rate of change in knee cartilage volume in adults
Rheumatology, February 1, 2007; 46(2): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.