Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on July 16, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/12/1559    most recent
keg435v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Herrick, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 1559-1563
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology


Report

Seventeen-point dermal ultrasound scoring system—a reliable measure of skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis

T. L. Moore1, M. Lunt3, B. McManus2, M. E. Anderson1 and A. L. Herrick1,3

1University of Manchester Rheumatic Diseases Centre and 2Radiology Directorate, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD and 3ARC Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

Correspondence to: A. Herrick, University of Manchester Rheumatic Diseases Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD. E-mail: aherrick{at}fs1.ho.man.ac.uk

Objective. Our objective was to develop a 17-site ultrasound method of measuring skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to assess its inter- and intra-observer variability.

Methods. Dermal thickness (using a 22 MHz ultrasound probe) was measured at 17 sites (corresponding to those assessed in the modified Rodnan skin score) in 39 patients with SSc (26 limited cutaneous, 13 diffuse) and 34 healthy controls. The sum of the thicknesses (at the 17 sites) and the maximal thickness were also documented. Because skin thickness varies between sites, each measurement was converted to a z-score. Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed in 35 patients/33 controls, and 20 patients/15 controls respectively.

Results. Measurement precision was good for the dermal measurements—intraclass correlation coefficients at the 17 sites ranged from 0.65 to 0.94 for the inter-observer variability (0.86 for maximum thickness) and from 0.55 to 0.96 for the intra-observer variability (0.92 for maximum thickness).

Conclusion. Our results suggest that the 17-point dermal ultrasound scoring system is extremely reliable and may therefore be a useful measure of outcome, including in clinical trials.

KEY WORDS: Scleroderma, Skin score, Dermal ultrasound.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
Y. Kuwahara, Y. Shima, D. Shirayama, M. Kawai, K. Hagihara, T. Hirano, J. Arimitsu, A. Ogata, T. Tanaka, and I. Kawase
Quantification of hardness, elasticity and viscosity of the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis using a novel sensing device (Vesmeter): a proposal for a new outcome measurement procedure
Rheumatology, July 1, 2008; 47(7): 1018 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
R. Hesselstrand, A. Scheja, M. Wildt, and A. Akesson
High-frequency ultrasound of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis reflects oedema, extension and severity in early disease
Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 84 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. A. Wollheim
Classification of systemic sclerosis. Visions and reality
Rheumatology, October 1, 2005; 44(10): 1212 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.