Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on February 28, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/3/435    most recent
keg144v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Allard, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Allard, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rehabilitation
Right arrow Psychology: Measurement and Management of Pain
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2003; 42: 435-441
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology

Long-term efficacy of a cognitive behavioural treatment from a randomized controlled trial for patients recently diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis

L. Sharpe, T. Sensky1, N. Timberlake2, B. Ryan2 and S. Allard2

School of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit F12, University of Sydney, Australia
1 Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK and
2 West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, UK

Objectives. This study examined the long-term efficacy of a cognitive behavioural intervention for patients with recent-onset, seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. Fifty-three consecutive patients with less than a 2-yr history of classic or definite RA were recruited into the trial. All participants received routine medical management during the study, and half were randomly allocated to receive an 8-week adjunctive psychological intervention. All assessments were conducted blind to the allocation. This paper reports intention-to-treat analyses of the 18-month follow-up.

Results. Consistent with short-term results, significant differences were found between the groups in depressive symptoms. The intervention group maintained improvements in joint function, although those in routine care made similar improvements over the ensuing 18 months. At follow-up, group differences emerged for disability and anxiety.

Conclusions. These results indicate that cognitive behavioural intervention offered as an adjunct to standard clinical management early in the course of RA is efficacious in producing improvements in both psychological and physical indices. Furthermore, improvements appear to increase 18 months after a brief, time-limited psychological treatment.

KEY WORDS: Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Psychological intervention, Cognitive behavioural treatment, Depression, Outcome assessment.

Correspondence to: L. Sharpe, Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit F 12, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006. E-mail: louises{at}psych.usyd.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Sheehy, E. Murphy, and M. Barry
Depression in rheumatoid arthritis--underscoring the problem
Rheumatology, November 1, 2006; 45(11): 1325 - 1327.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003)
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2003; 6(4): e1 - 12.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.