Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on March 31, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rheumatology 2003; 42: 919-923
© 2003 British Society for Rheumatology
Editorial |
Joint counts in routine practice
Department of Rheumatology, GKT School of Medicine, King's College Hospital (Dulwich), East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8PT, UK,
1 Department of Internal Medicine III, Institute for Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany and
2 Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Swollen and tender joints are the most characteristic features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and disease severity is directly related to the numbers of swollen and tender joints. Consequently, clinical trials of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biologicals use reductions in swollen and tender joint counts as key outcome measures. Despite their central place in RA, we believe that joint counts are not always recorded in specialist clinical care. Our purpose in this editorial is to make the case for their invariable adoption in routine practice.
Counting the number of swollen joints is a clinical method of quantifying the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Joint tenderness, by contrast, is more closely associated with the amount of pain. As the relationship between joint swelling and tenderness varies from case to case and time to time in the same patient, it is traditional to assess them both. There is no existing consensus on a
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Furst, R. J. Halbert, C. O. Bingham III, S. Fukudome, L. Anderson, P. Bonafede, V. Bray, S. B. Cohen, Y. R. S. Sherrer, E. W. S. St Clair, et al. Evaluating the adequacy of disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a RAND appropriateness panel Rheumatology, February 1, 2008; 47(2): 194 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Salaffi, E. Filippucci, M. Carotti, E. Naredo, G. Meenagh, A. Ciapetti, V. Savic, and W. Grassi Inter-observer agreement of standard joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with grey scale ultrasonography a preliminary study Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 54 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Greenwood, A. J. Hakim, E. Carson, and D. V. Doyle Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology, January 1, 2006; 45(1): 66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Tutuncu, C. Bansal, and A. Kavanaugh Disease measures in evaluating the effect of anti-TNF therapy and predicting clinical outcome Rheumatology, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 682 - 683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. F. Rowe, A. Filer, C.-S. Yee, A. Pace, K. Douglas, and D. Situnayake Reply Rheumatology, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 400 - 401. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
