Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on January 6, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/3/315    most recent
keh009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metzler, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhold-Keller, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metzler, C.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhold-Keller, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Rheumatology 2004; 43: 315-320
Rheumatology Vol. 43 No. 3 (c) British Society for Rheumatology 2003; all rights reserved


Clinical

Maintenance of remission with leflunomide in Wegener's granulomatosis

C. Metzler, C. Fink, P. Lamprecht, W. L. Gross and E. Reinhold-Keller

Department of Rheumatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Rheumaklinik Bad Bramstedt GmbH, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.

Correspondence to: E. Reinhold-Keller, Poliklinik für Rheumatologie des Universitätsklinikums Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Rheumaklinik Bad Bramstedt GmbH, Oskar-Alexander-Strasse 26, D-24576 Bad Bramstedt, Germany. E-mail: RKeller{at}rheuma-zentrum.de

Objective. To investigate the safety and efficacy of leflunomide plus low-dose prednisolone for the maintenance of remission in Wegener's granulomatosis (WG).

Methods. This was a Phase II, single-centre, open-label clinical investigation of patients with generalized WG treated with leflunomide after the induction of complete (n = 4) or partial (n = 16) remission by cyclophosphamide/prednisolone combination therapy. Leflunomide treatment was initiated at 20 mg/day and increased to 30 mg/day after 12 weeks and, in patients with partial remission, to 40 mg/day after 24 weeks. Concomitant low-dose prednisolone (<=10 mg/day) was allowed during the study. In addition to the frequency of relapse, treatment efficacy was assessed by the standard measures of disease activity/extent.

Results. A total of 20 patients were enrolled in the trial. During a treatment period of up to 2.5 yr (median 1.75 yr, range 1–2.5 yr), one patient had a major relapse and required retreatment with cyclophosphamide/prednisolone. Eight patients had minor relapses that were successfully treated by dose increases to 40 mg/day leflunomide. Disease activity remained unchanged for the duration of the study. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild respiratory infection (40%), arthralgia (35%) and hypertension (35%); dry skin, nail disorder and diarrhoea were each reported by 30% of patients. Despite the aggressive pretreatment with cyclophosphamide, adverse events with leflunomide treatment at the higher dose (30–40 mg/day) were comparable with those seen with the standard dose (20 mg/day) for rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Conclusion. Leflunomide appears to be safe and well tolerated for the maintenance of complete or partial remission of WG. The results of this pilot study encourage further controlled trials comparing leflunomide with alternative remission maintenance therapies.

KEY WORDS: Wegener's granulomatosis, Leflunomide, Prednisolone, Remission, Maintenance therapy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
B. Chikura, S. Lane, and J. K. Dawson
Clinical expression of leflunomide-induced pneumonitis
Rheumatology, September 1, 2009; 48(9): 1065 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
X. Bosch, A. Guilabert, G. Espinosa, and E. Mirapeix
Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Associated Vasculitis: A Systematic Review
JAMA, August 8, 2007; 298(6): 655 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. Jayne
Leflunomide versus methotrexate in Wegener's granulomatosis
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1047 - 1048.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. Metzler, N. Miehle, K. Manger, C. Iking-Konert, K. de Groot, B. Hellmich, W. L. Gross, E. Reinhold-Keller, and for the German Network of Rheumatic Diseases
Elevated relapse rate under oral methotrexate versus leflunomide for maintenance of remission in Wegener's granulomatosis
Rheumatology, July 1, 2007; 46(7): 1087 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Sebastiani, D. Giuggioli, E. Vesprini, A. Caruso, and C. Ferri
Successful treatment with leflunomide of arthritis in systemic sclerosis patients
Rheumatology, September 1, 2006; 45(9): 1175 - 1176.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
D. R. Thickett, A. G. Richter, N. Nathani, G. D. Perkins, and L. Harper
Pulmonary manifestations of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive vasculitis
Rheumatology, March 1, 2006; 45(3): 261 - 268.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. L. Hogan, R. J. Falk, H. Chin, J. Cai, C. E. Jennette, J. C. Jennette, and P. H. Nachman
Predictors of Relapse and Treatment Resistance in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Small-Vessel Vasculitis
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 2005; 143(9): 621 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E N van Roon, T L T A Jansen, M A F J van de Laar, M Janssen, J P Yska, R Keuper, P M Houtman, and J R B J Brouwers
Therapeutic drug monitoring of A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide: serum concentrations predict response to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2005; 64(4): 569 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.