Skip Navigation


Rheumatology Advance Access originally published online on February 22, 2006
Rheumatology 2006 45(8):1023-1028; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/8/1023    most recent
kel051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koh, E. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koh, E. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rheumatoid Arthritis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Chinese version of SF-36 in oriental patients with rheumatoid arthritis

E. T. Koh, K. P. Leong, I. Y. Y. Tsou1, V. H. Lim, L. Y. Pong, S. Y. Chong, A. Seow2 and for the Tan Tock Seng Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis (TTSH RA) Study Group*

Departments of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology and 1 Diagnostic Imaging, Tan Tock Seng Hospital and 2 Department of Community, Occupational and Family Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Correspondence to: E. T. Koh, Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433. E-mail: ee_tzun_koh{at}ttsh.com.sg

Objective. To assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of a Chinese version of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) in Chinese-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Singapore.

Methods. The psychometric properties of the Chinese Hong Kong standard version of the SF-36 were assessed in 401 RA patients. The construct validity of the Chinese SF-36 was assessed by comparison with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) functional status, a validated Chinese Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ) and markers of RA activity and severity.

Results. The overall Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.921, reflecting excellent internal consistency. The instrument showed reasonable test–retest reliability except in the social functioning (SF) subscale. There was a significant ceiling effect in the role physical (RP), SF and role emotional (RE) subscales and a floor effect in the RP and RE subscales. Physical function (PF) and SF were strongly correlated with C-HAQ and patient's assessment of RA activity [Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) ranging from –0.41 to –0.53] and moderately correlated with ACR functional status (r = –0.35 and –0.3, respectively). Weak correlations were also found between the Chinese SF-36 and markers of RA activity, deformed joint count and radiographic damage. PF and SF were the subscales most responsive to change in quality of life (QOL).

Conclusion. The Chinese SF-36 showed reasonable reliability, criterion validity and responsiveness with limitations in certain subscales. Overall, the physical domains and PF in particular may be the most ideal psychometric measures of QOL in RA.

KEY WORDS: Rheumatoid arthritis, Chinese SF-36

*The TTSH RA Study group consists of K. O. Kong, B. Y. H. Thong, W. G. Law, T. Y. Lian, Y. K. Cheng, H. H. Chng, C. L. Teh, L. C. Chew, T. C. Lau, H. S. Howe and W. H. Yong, Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.