Skip Navigation

Rheumatology 2006 45(Supplement 3):iii5-iii7; doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kel281
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer-Betz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer-Betz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soft Tissue Rheumatism
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Connective tissue diseases: evaluation of clinical response

R. Fischer-Betz and M. Schneider

Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Rheumatologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Correspondence to: Dr Rebecca Fischer-Betz, Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Rheumatologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany. E-mail: Rebecca.Fischer{at}med.uni-duesseldorf.de

Systemic connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are disease entities characterized by a systemic and heterogeneous spectrum of clinical symptoms. The treatment of CDTs has improved substantially, but with the developments of new and probably more expensive targeted therapies, there will be a need of rigorous evaluation in patient-oriented research. Proposed domains for outcome measurement of CTDs are activity, damage by disease and/or medications and quality of life. To evaluate the overall disease activity in CTDs, scores are developed that include typical signs and symptoms. For example, in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), various activity instruments have been developed and validated. Recently, a definition for significant reduction in activity based on these scores was proposed and has now to be validated in clinical trials. In addition, the American College of Rheumatology has framed recommendations for response criteria of major target organs. Besides, the rarity of CTDs other than SLE and the rare therapeutic options, especially the heterogeneous disease expression, has prevented development of instruments scoring the disease activity. In individual patients, there is need for a more organ-specific evaluation, and non-disease-specific and/or global health instruments may be used in evaluating the response of individual treatment regimen.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.